[The contamination of airturbine handpieces and the disinfecting effect of ultraviolet rays].

T. Masui
{"title":"[The contamination of airturbine handpieces and the disinfecting effect of ultraviolet rays].","authors":"T. Masui","doi":"10.5834/JDH.30.103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has been reported by various investigators that a greater proportion of the contamination on the part of dentists and their clinics is due to drilling with high-speed air-turbine handpieces. It is not only the dentist or his clinic that is contaminated, but also the handpieces themselves that probably become contaminated. For this reason, some kind of countermeasure is needed. But, because of their structure it is difficult to disinfect these instruments and, therefore, we must search for an easy method of disinfection in clinical environments.In the belief that ultraviolet ray, if it could be proved sufficiently effective for bacteriocidal purposes, would provide one easy means of disinfection, I carried out the following research. For study purposes, 3 different types of dental clinics were selected:1) those clinics where handpieces were not disinfected at all dnring dental treatment, 2) those clinics where handpieces were occasionally disinfected, and 3) those clinics where handpieces were disinfected every time they were employed.In these 3 different types of dental clinics, efforts were made to wipe off the handpieces for 5 days prior to the treatment in the first week and at the end of treatment daily in the second week.The number of bacterial coloneis between these two-week intervals were measured and analyzed.By way of determining the disinfecting effects of ultraviolet ray on different bacteria, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis were selectivly used to establish the density of ultraviolet ray and the time of bacteriocidal effect.In the last phase of the study, an apparatus was devised so that the entire surface of handpieces could be disinfected and the different bacteriocidal effects were comparatively examined.As a result of the present sudy, I arrived at the following salient conclusions.1. In dental clinics where handpieces were not routinely disinfected, the degree of bacterial infection was much larger than in other dental clincis where handpieces were regularly disinfected.2. Even in dental clinics in which handpieces were disinfected after every dental treatment, they were not always free from bacterial infection.3. The time required for disinfection of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aurens, and Bacillus subtilis by an application of ultraviolet ray could be much reduced by increasing the intensity of the ultraviolet ray.4. The bacteriocidal effects of ultraviolet ray were most prominently observed with Escherichia coli, followed by Staphylococcus aurens, and Bacillus subtilis.5. An ultraviolet disinfecting apparatus, devised by me for this study, was effective in killing the bacteria on handpieces within 5 minutes.","PeriodicalId":76075,"journal":{"name":"Koku Eisei Gakkai zasshi","volume":"1 1","pages":"41-51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Koku Eisei Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5834/JDH.30.103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It has been reported by various investigators that a greater proportion of the contamination on the part of dentists and their clinics is due to drilling with high-speed air-turbine handpieces. It is not only the dentist or his clinic that is contaminated, but also the handpieces themselves that probably become contaminated. For this reason, some kind of countermeasure is needed. But, because of their structure it is difficult to disinfect these instruments and, therefore, we must search for an easy method of disinfection in clinical environments.In the belief that ultraviolet ray, if it could be proved sufficiently effective for bacteriocidal purposes, would provide one easy means of disinfection, I carried out the following research. For study purposes, 3 different types of dental clinics were selected:1) those clinics where handpieces were not disinfected at all dnring dental treatment, 2) those clinics where handpieces were occasionally disinfected, and 3) those clinics where handpieces were disinfected every time they were employed.In these 3 different types of dental clinics, efforts were made to wipe off the handpieces for 5 days prior to the treatment in the first week and at the end of treatment daily in the second week.The number of bacterial coloneis between these two-week intervals were measured and analyzed.By way of determining the disinfecting effects of ultraviolet ray on different bacteria, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis were selectivly used to establish the density of ultraviolet ray and the time of bacteriocidal effect.In the last phase of the study, an apparatus was devised so that the entire surface of handpieces could be disinfected and the different bacteriocidal effects were comparatively examined.As a result of the present sudy, I arrived at the following salient conclusions.1. In dental clinics where handpieces were not routinely disinfected, the degree of bacterial infection was much larger than in other dental clincis where handpieces were regularly disinfected.2. Even in dental clinics in which handpieces were disinfected after every dental treatment, they were not always free from bacterial infection.3. The time required for disinfection of Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aurens, and Bacillus subtilis by an application of ultraviolet ray could be much reduced by increasing the intensity of the ultraviolet ray.4. The bacteriocidal effects of ultraviolet ray were most prominently observed with Escherichia coli, followed by Staphylococcus aurens, and Bacillus subtilis.5. An ultraviolet disinfecting apparatus, devised by me for this study, was effective in killing the bacteria on handpieces within 5 minutes.
[空气透平手机的污染及紫外线的消毒作用]。
根据各种调查人员的报告,牙医及其诊所的大部分污染是由于使用高速空气涡轮手机钻孔造成的。不仅牙医或他的诊所受到污染,而且手机本身也可能受到污染。因此,有必要采取对策。但是,由于这些仪器的结构难以消毒,因此,我们必须寻找一种简便的方法在临床环境中消毒。我相信紫外线,如果它能被证明对杀菌足够有效,将提供一种简单的消毒手段,我进行了以下研究。为了研究目的,我们选择了3种不同类型的牙科诊所:1)在牙科治疗过程中手机完全不消毒的诊所,2)手机偶尔消毒的诊所,以及3)每次使用手机都消毒的诊所。在这3个不同类型的牙科诊所,在第一周治疗前5天,在第二周治疗结束时,每天都要擦拭手机。在这两周的间隔期间,测量并分析了细菌集落的数量。通过测定紫外线对不同细菌的杀菌效果,对大肠杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和枯草芽孢杆菌进行了选择性筛选,确定了紫外线的密度和杀菌作用时间。在研究的最后阶段,设计了一种可以对手机表面进行全面消毒的装置,并比较了不同杀菌效果。作为目前研究的结果,我得出了以下重要结论。手机未进行常规消毒的牙科诊所细菌感染程度远高于其他手机定期消毒的牙科诊所。即使在每次牙科治疗后对手机进行消毒的牙科诊所,手机也并非总是没有细菌感染。紫外线对大肠杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和枯草芽孢杆菌的消毒时间可以通过增加紫外线强度而大大缩短。紫外线对大肠杆菌的杀菌效果最显著,其次是金黄色葡萄球菌和枯草芽孢杆菌。我为这项研究设计了一种紫外线消毒装置,可以在5分钟内有效地杀死手机上的细菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信