Postmodern Pastiche: The Case of Mrs Osmond by John Banville / Pastiche Pós-moderno: O Caso de Mrs. Osmond, de John Banville

4区 文学
Aurora Piñeiro
{"title":"Postmodern Pastiche: The Case of Mrs Osmond by John Banville / Pastiche Pós-moderno: O Caso de Mrs. Osmond, de John Banville","authors":"Aurora Piñeiro","doi":"10.37389/abei.v22i1.3852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: According to both Genette and Hutcheon, parody is transformational in its relationship to other texts, whereas pastiche is imitative. Other theorists such as Hoesterey and Dyer have redefined pastiche (and imitative textual practices) from the perspective of postmodern aesthetics and explored the way in which it resignifies previous artworks, as it is associated to an awareness of historicity. The aim of this article is to analyse Mrs Osmond (2017) by John Banville as an example of a postmodern pastiche that not only operates by correspondence or tribute in relation to The Portrait of a Lady (1881) by Henry James, but also as a novel where recontextualisation does create meaningful differences between the literary works involved. It is in this distance that Banville’s text unsettles traditional notions of pastiche and produces a more polyvalent effect as well as an expansion of the multiplicity already associated to his authorial figure. Resumo: Segundo Genette e Hutcheon, a parodia e transformacional em sua relacao com outros textos, enquanto o pastiche e imitativo. Outros teoricos como Hoesterey e Dyer redefiniram o pastiche (e praticas textuais imitativas) a partir da perspectiva da estetica pos-moderna e exploraram a maneira pela obras de arte anteriores sao ressignificadas, pois o pastiche esta associado a uma consciencia da historicidade. O objetivo deste artigo e analisar Mrs. Osmond (2017), de John Banville, como exemplo de um pastiche pos-moderno que nao so opera por correspondencia ou tributo em relacao a The Portrait of a Lady (1881), de Henry James, mas tambem como um romance no qual a recontextualizacao cria diferencas significativas entre as obras literarias envolvidas. E a essa distância que o texto de Banville desestabiliza as nocoes tradicionais de pastiche e produz um efeito mais polivalente, alem de uma expansao da multiplicidade ja associada a sua figura autoral.","PeriodicalId":29863,"journal":{"name":"EIGSE-A JOURNAL OF IRISH STUDIES","volume":"96 1","pages":"121-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EIGSE-A JOURNAL OF IRISH STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37389/abei.v22i1.3852","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: According to both Genette and Hutcheon, parody is transformational in its relationship to other texts, whereas pastiche is imitative. Other theorists such as Hoesterey and Dyer have redefined pastiche (and imitative textual practices) from the perspective of postmodern aesthetics and explored the way in which it resignifies previous artworks, as it is associated to an awareness of historicity. The aim of this article is to analyse Mrs Osmond (2017) by John Banville as an example of a postmodern pastiche that not only operates by correspondence or tribute in relation to The Portrait of a Lady (1881) by Henry James, but also as a novel where recontextualisation does create meaningful differences between the literary works involved. It is in this distance that Banville’s text unsettles traditional notions of pastiche and produces a more polyvalent effect as well as an expansion of the multiplicity already associated to his authorial figure. Resumo: Segundo Genette e Hutcheon, a parodia e transformacional em sua relacao com outros textos, enquanto o pastiche e imitativo. Outros teoricos como Hoesterey e Dyer redefiniram o pastiche (e praticas textuais imitativas) a partir da perspectiva da estetica pos-moderna e exploraram a maneira pela obras de arte anteriores sao ressignificadas, pois o pastiche esta associado a uma consciencia da historicidade. O objetivo deste artigo e analisar Mrs. Osmond (2017), de John Banville, como exemplo de um pastiche pos-moderno que nao so opera por correspondencia ou tributo em relacao a The Portrait of a Lady (1881), de Henry James, mas tambem como um romance no qual a recontextualizacao cria diferencas significativas entre as obras literarias envolvidas. E a essa distância que o texto de Banville desestabiliza as nocoes tradicionais de pastiche e produz um efeito mais polivalente, alem de uma expansao da multiplicidade ja associada a sua figura autoral.
《后现代画报:奥斯蒙德夫人的案例》,约翰·班维尔著
摘要:吉内特和哈钦都认为戏仿是对其他文本的转换,而模仿是模仿。其他理论家如Hoesterey和Dyer从后现代美学的角度重新定义了模仿(和模仿文本实践),并探索了它重新定义以前艺术作品的方式,因为它与历史性意识有关。本文的目的是分析约翰·班维尔(John Banville)的《奥斯蒙德夫人》(2017),将其作为后现代仿作的一个例子,不仅通过与亨利·詹姆斯(Henry James)的《一位女士的肖像》(1881)的通信或致敬来操作,而且作为一部小说,重新语境化确实在所涉及的文学作品之间创造了有意义的差异。正是在这种距离上,班维尔的文本打破了传统的模仿概念,产生了一种更多元的效果,也扩展了他的作者形象所具有的多样性。个人简历:Segundo Genette e Hutcheon,是一名善于模仿和模仿的人,他是一名具有变革性的作家,也是一名与外部文本相关的人。“外在的建筑”、“外在的建筑”、“外在的建筑”、“外在的建筑”、“后现代的建筑”、“外在的建筑”、“外在的建筑”、“外在的建筑”、“外在的建筑”、“外在的建筑”、“外在的建筑”、“外在的建筑”、“内在的建筑”、“历史的建筑”。《奥斯蒙德夫人》(2017)、《约翰·班维尔》(John Banville)、《一个女人的画像》(1881)、《亨利·詹姆斯》(Henry James)、《平凡的爱情》(como - um - romance)、《重新语境化》(recontextuiziziza)和《文学的介入》(obras literarienvidas)的重要中心。他说:“我们有一种独特的风格,它是一种传统的风格,是一种仿古的风格,是一种传统的风格,是一种政治的风格,是一种扩展的风格,是一种多元化的风格,是一种独特的风格。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EIGSE-A JOURNAL OF IRISH STUDIES
EIGSE-A JOURNAL OF IRISH STUDIES LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书