Jane Addams on Civic Education: Hull-House’s Pluralistic Civic Inquiry for Egalitarian Relations

Chaebong Nam
{"title":"Jane Addams on Civic Education: Hull-House’s Pluralistic Civic Inquiry for Egalitarian Relations","authors":"Chaebong Nam","doi":"10.1080/00377996.2021.1997888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Hull-House was a unique social experiment by which Jane Addams realized her egalitarian vision for a shared civic life. Facing soaring social problems of the early twentieth century, Hull-House’s most important mission was to help new immigrants learn the rule of self-government and become successful drivers of it. Hull-House was an unusual group of changemakers, in that many, being women, didn’t have the right to vote until the ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920. Many people coming from different origins with divergent interests, talents, and social backgrounds joined Hull-House’s innovative changemaking effort towards communal problem-solving. They learned from one another and collaborated on equal footing with respect for diversity. To address a range of social problems, Hull-House invented what I call “pluralistic civic inquiry,” described in four categories in this essay: social inquiry, activist inquiry, cultural inquiry, and educational inquiry. According to Addams, “Americanism”—i.e., the idea of unity—is represented by this entire gamut of pluralistic civic inquiry, not conformity to a particular set of creeds. I conclude with implications of Hull-House’s theory and practice for civic education reform today.","PeriodicalId":83074,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of social education : official journal of the Indiana Council for the Social Studies","volume":"110 1","pages":"137 - 152"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of social education : official journal of the Indiana Council for the Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2021.1997888","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Hull-House was a unique social experiment by which Jane Addams realized her egalitarian vision for a shared civic life. Facing soaring social problems of the early twentieth century, Hull-House’s most important mission was to help new immigrants learn the rule of self-government and become successful drivers of it. Hull-House was an unusual group of changemakers, in that many, being women, didn’t have the right to vote until the ratification of the Nineteenth Amendment in 1920. Many people coming from different origins with divergent interests, talents, and social backgrounds joined Hull-House’s innovative changemaking effort towards communal problem-solving. They learned from one another and collaborated on equal footing with respect for diversity. To address a range of social problems, Hull-House invented what I call “pluralistic civic inquiry,” described in four categories in this essay: social inquiry, activist inquiry, cultural inquiry, and educational inquiry. According to Addams, “Americanism”—i.e., the idea of unity—is represented by this entire gamut of pluralistic civic inquiry, not conformity to a particular set of creeds. I conclude with implications of Hull-House’s theory and practice for civic education reform today.
简·亚当斯论公民教育:赫尔豪斯对平等主义关系的多元公民探究
赫尔之家是一个独特的社会实验,简·亚当斯通过它实现了她对共享公民生活的平等主义愿景。面对20世纪初急剧上升的社会问题,赫尔豪斯学院最重要的使命是帮助新移民学习自治的规则,并成为成功的推动者。赫尔-豪斯是一群不同寻常的变革者,因为在1920年第19条修正案获得批准之前,许多妇女都没有投票权。许多人来自不同的国家,有着不同的兴趣、才能和社会背景,加入了赫尔之家的创新变革努力,以解决社区问题。他们相互学习,在尊重多样性的基础上平等合作。为了解决一系列社会问题,赫尔豪斯发明了我所谓的“多元公民探究”,在本文中分为四个类别:社会探究、活动家探究、文化探究和教育探究。根据亚当斯的说法,“美国主义”——即:这一理念体现在多元公民探究的整个范围内,而不是遵从某一套特定的信条。最后,我总结了赫尔豪斯的理论和实践对当今公民教育改革的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信