Evaluation of Service Quality Gaps in Construction Professional Service Firms in Nigeria

IF 0.8 Q4 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Aluko Olusola Raphael, Omoniyi Sunday Samuel, A. Dipeolu
{"title":"Evaluation of Service Quality Gaps in Construction Professional Service Firms in Nigeria","authors":"Aluko Olusola Raphael, Omoniyi Sunday Samuel, A. Dipeolu","doi":"10.21315/jcdc2022.27.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aims at evaluating and comparing service quality of consultancy firms who provide professional services in building projects in Nigeria. The article seeks to address the general perceptions of dissatisfaction with the quality of services in order to enhance performance of building projects and ensure competitiveness in the industry. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire as an instrument of data collection. The population of the study consisted of 488 representatives of public and private clients with a sample size of 385. Data were analysed using weighted mean and paired-sample t-test to determine the severity of differences in the expected service quality and perceived service quality. The result shows significant differences between the expected service quality and perceived service quality in structural engineering, mechanical/electrical engineering and quantity surveying services along all the dimensions of service quality. However, \"Tangibles\" dimension of architectural services had no positive differences in the service quality, but had differences in \"Responsiveness\", \"Empathy\", \"Reliability\" and \"Assurance\" dimensions. The results imply that professional service providers require fundamental improvement in their services to their clients. This study offers an opportunity for consultancy firms to evolve global best practices by creating and maintaining high service quality as a team.","PeriodicalId":51876,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Construction in Developing Countries","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Construction in Developing Countries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21315/jcdc2022.27.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The study aims at evaluating and comparing service quality of consultancy firms who provide professional services in building projects in Nigeria. The article seeks to address the general perceptions of dissatisfaction with the quality of services in order to enhance performance of building projects and ensure competitiveness in the industry. A cross-sectional survey was conducted using a structured questionnaire as an instrument of data collection. The population of the study consisted of 488 representatives of public and private clients with a sample size of 385. Data were analysed using weighted mean and paired-sample t-test to determine the severity of differences in the expected service quality and perceived service quality. The result shows significant differences between the expected service quality and perceived service quality in structural engineering, mechanical/electrical engineering and quantity surveying services along all the dimensions of service quality. However, "Tangibles" dimension of architectural services had no positive differences in the service quality, but had differences in "Responsiveness", "Empathy", "Reliability" and "Assurance" dimensions. The results imply that professional service providers require fundamental improvement in their services to their clients. This study offers an opportunity for consultancy firms to evolve global best practices by creating and maintaining high service quality as a team.
尼日利亚建筑专业服务公司服务质量差距评价
该研究旨在评估和比较在尼日利亚建筑项目中提供专业服务的咨询公司的服务质量。这篇文章旨在解决对服务质量的普遍不满,以提高建筑项目的表现和确保在行业中的竞争力。横断面调查采用结构化问卷作为数据收集的工具。该研究的人口包括488名公共和私人客户代表,样本量为385人。采用加权平均和配对样本t检验对数据进行分析,以确定预期服务质量和感知服务质量差异的严重程度。结果表明,结构工程、机电工程和工料测量服务的预期服务质量与感知服务质量在服务质量的各个维度上存在显著差异。而建筑服务的“有形”维度在服务质量上无显著性差异,但在“响应性”、“共情性”、“可靠性”和“保证性”维度上存在显著性差异。结果表明,专业服务提供者需要从根本上改善他们对客户的服务。这项研究为咨询公司提供了一个机会,通过创建和保持团队的高服务质量来发展全球最佳实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Construction in Developing Countries
Journal of Construction in Developing Countries CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Construction in Developing Countries seeks to provide a central vehicle for the exchange and dissemination of knowledge on issues relevant to the built environment of developing countries. The journal provides a wide range of original research an application papers on current developments and advances in the built environment as well as the economic, social, cultural and technological contexts of developing countries. It also publishes detailed case studies, as well as short communications and discussions. Topics covered include, but are not restricted to planning, urban economics, rural and regional development, housing, management and resource issues, sustiainability, knowledge and technology transfer, construction procurement, facilities management, information an communication technologies, strategies and policy issues, design issues, conservation and environmental issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信