Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine plus regional hyperthermia for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma: initial experience.

Radiation medicine Pub Date : 2008-12-01 Epub Date: 2009-01-08 DOI:10.1007/s11604-008-0279-y
Takayuki Ohguri, Hajime Imada, Katsuya Yahara, Hiroyuki Narisada, Tomoaki Morioka, Keita Nakano, Yukunori Korogi
{"title":"Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with gemcitabine plus regional hyperthermia for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma: initial experience.","authors":"Takayuki Ohguri, Hajime Imada, Katsuya Yahara, Hiroyuki Narisada, Tomoaki Morioka, Keita Nakano, Yukunori Korogi","doi":"10.1007/s11604-008-0279-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with gemcitabine plus regional hyperthermia (HT) for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 29 patients with LAPC treated with concurrent CRT using gemcitabine were retrospectively analyzed. Radiotherapy was administered with a median total dose of 61.2 Gy. Of the 29 patients, 20 (69%) also underwent regional HT during CRT (CRHT group). The remaining 9 patients did not receive regional HT (CRT group) because of a common bile duct stent placement, patient refusal, older age, or obesity. The efficacy and toxicity of the treatments and the predictors of good outcome were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median disease progression-free and overall survival times were significantly better for the CRHT group than for the CRT group (8.8 vs. 4.9 months, P = 0.02, and 18.6 vs. 9.6 months, P = 0.01), respectively. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicities for the CRHT group were detected in eight patients (40%) and grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity in one (diarrhea).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Concurrent CRT using gemcitabine with regional HT may be a feasible and promising regimen for LAPC, and the results justified further evaluation in a large number of patients to confirm its definite benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":49640,"journal":{"name":"Radiation medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"587-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-008-0279-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2009/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with gemcitabine plus regional hyperthermia (HT) for locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma (LAPC).

Materials and methods: A total of 29 patients with LAPC treated with concurrent CRT using gemcitabine were retrospectively analyzed. Radiotherapy was administered with a median total dose of 61.2 Gy. Of the 29 patients, 20 (69%) also underwent regional HT during CRT (CRHT group). The remaining 9 patients did not receive regional HT (CRT group) because of a common bile duct stent placement, patient refusal, older age, or obesity. The efficacy and toxicity of the treatments and the predictors of good outcome were evaluated.

Results: The median disease progression-free and overall survival times were significantly better for the CRHT group than for the CRT group (8.8 vs. 4.9 months, P = 0.02, and 18.6 vs. 9.6 months, P = 0.01), respectively. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicities for the CRHT group were detected in eight patients (40%) and grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity in one (diarrhea).

Conclusion: Concurrent CRT using gemcitabine with regional HT may be a feasible and promising regimen for LAPC, and the results justified further evaluation in a large number of patients to confirm its definite benefit.

吉西他滨同步放化疗加局部热疗治疗局部晚期胰腺癌:初步经验。
目的:本研究的目的是评估吉西他滨同步放化疗(CRT)加局部热疗(HT)治疗局部晚期胰腺癌(LAPC)的疗效和毒性。材料与方法:回顾性分析29例应用吉西他滨同步CRT治疗的LAPC患者。放疗的中位总剂量为61.2 Gy。在29例患者中,20例(69%)在CRT期间也接受了局部HT (CRHT组)。其余9例患者因胆总管支架置入术、患者拒绝、年龄较大或肥胖而未接受局部HT (CRT组)。评价两种治疗方法的疗效、毒副作用及预后良好的预测因素。结果:CRHT组的中位疾病无进展时间和总生存时间均显著优于CRT组(分别为8.8个月对4.9个月,P = 0.02, 18.6个月对9.6个月,P = 0.01)。CRHT组有8例(40%)患者检测到3-4级血液毒性,1例(腹泻)患者检测到3级非血液毒性。结论:吉西他滨同步CRT联合局部HT治疗LAPC可能是一种可行且有前景的方案,结果值得在大量患者中进一步评估以证实其确切的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书