ANALYZING POST-COVID-19 TEACHING METHODS IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A QUALITY AND EXPERIENCE BASED DECISION-MAKING STUDY

IF 1 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Nuri Doğan
{"title":"ANALYZING POST-COVID-19 TEACHING METHODS IN HIGHER EDUCATION: A QUALITY AND EXPERIENCE BASED DECISION-MAKING STUDY","authors":"Nuri Doğan","doi":"10.32890/ijms2022.29.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the world suffers from the Covid-19 pandemic for more than a year, a new way of life has begun for people in their professional as well as private lives. Therefore, previous methods, habits or procedures during the pandemic may no longer be valid. Education, being one of the most affected sectors during this period, together with its broad related environment have been significantly impacted. In this context, the present study focused on higher education. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the different teaching methods after the Covid-19 pandemic period from the point of view of lecturers working in the health services department of a state university in Turkey. Accordingly, two hierarchical models: service quality and experience based were developed and the opinions of lecturers were obtained using one of the multi criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, namely the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Face-to-face was found to be the optimum teaching method for both the models while the rest of the teaching alternatives were ranked separately in order of importance for these two models. Moreover, criteria were prioritized for the first and the second models, respectively. Limitations of the study including future research directions were identified.","PeriodicalId":41612,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2022.29.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the world suffers from the Covid-19 pandemic for more than a year, a new way of life has begun for people in their professional as well as private lives. Therefore, previous methods, habits or procedures during the pandemic may no longer be valid. Education, being one of the most affected sectors during this period, together with its broad related environment have been significantly impacted. In this context, the present study focused on higher education. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the different teaching methods after the Covid-19 pandemic period from the point of view of lecturers working in the health services department of a state university in Turkey. Accordingly, two hierarchical models: service quality and experience based were developed and the opinions of lecturers were obtained using one of the multi criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods, namely the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Face-to-face was found to be the optimum teaching method for both the models while the rest of the teaching alternatives were ranked separately in order of importance for these two models. Moreover, criteria were prioritized for the first and the second models, respectively. Limitations of the study including future research directions were identified.
新冠肺炎疫情后高等教育教学方法分析:基于质量和经验的决策研究
随着全球遭受新冠肺炎大流行的一年多,人们在职业和私人生活中开始了一种新的生活方式。因此,大流行期间以前的方法、习惯或程序可能不再有效。教育是这一时期受影响最严重的部门之一,其广泛的相关环境也受到了重大影响。在此背景下,本研究的重点是高等教育。因此,本研究的目的是从土耳其一所州立大学卫生服务部门的讲师的角度评估Covid-19大流行时期后的不同教学方法。在此基础上,建立了以服务质量为基础和以经验为基础的两个层次模型,并利用多准则决策(MCDM)方法之一即层次分析法(AHP)获得了讲师的意见。面对面被发现是两种模式的最佳教学方法,而其余的教学方案分别按照这两种模式的重要性排序。此外,分别为第一种和第二种模型确定了标准的优先级。指出了研究的局限性和未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
14.30%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信