{"title":"The concept of coping modes: Relating cognitive person variables to actual coping behavior","authors":"Heinz Walter Krohne","doi":"10.1016/0146-6402(89)90027-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the first section, a model of “coping modes” is presented which distinguishes two main classes of coping strategies: vigilance and cognitive avoidance. Vigilance is characterized by an approach to and an intensified processing of threat-relevant information. Its general purpose is to gain control over the main threat-related aspects of a situation, thereby protecting the individual from the perception of threat which would result from the confrontation with unexpected dangers. Cognitive avoidance is viewed as a withdrawal from threat-relevant information. Its general purpose is to reduce the arousal engendered by the confrontation with an aversive event. Both terms are employed to describe actual stress-related actions and cognitive operations as well as interindividual differences in the dispositional inclination toward a certain class of strategies. The second section introduces an instrument for the separate assessment of vigilant and avoidant coping. Finally, a study which demonstrates the predictive power of this instrument is reported. This study analyzes the influence of dispositional and actual vigilant and avoidant coping strategies on self-reported and biochemical stress indicators as evidenced by patients facing a surgical operation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100041,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"11 4","pages":"Pages 235-248"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(89)90027-1","citationCount":"176","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0146640289900271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 176
Abstract
In the first section, a model of “coping modes” is presented which distinguishes two main classes of coping strategies: vigilance and cognitive avoidance. Vigilance is characterized by an approach to and an intensified processing of threat-relevant information. Its general purpose is to gain control over the main threat-related aspects of a situation, thereby protecting the individual from the perception of threat which would result from the confrontation with unexpected dangers. Cognitive avoidance is viewed as a withdrawal from threat-relevant information. Its general purpose is to reduce the arousal engendered by the confrontation with an aversive event. Both terms are employed to describe actual stress-related actions and cognitive operations as well as interindividual differences in the dispositional inclination toward a certain class of strategies. The second section introduces an instrument for the separate assessment of vigilant and avoidant coping. Finally, a study which demonstrates the predictive power of this instrument is reported. This study analyzes the influence of dispositional and actual vigilant and avoidant coping strategies on self-reported and biochemical stress indicators as evidenced by patients facing a surgical operation.