Saved by God's "Grease": The Pathology of Political Bodies in Smollett's Humphry Clinker

P. Williams
{"title":"Saved by God's \"Grease\": The Pathology of Political Bodies in Smollett's Humphry Clinker","authors":"P. Williams","doi":"10.1353/ECY.2019.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:The limited scholarship concerning cross-pollination between eighteenth-century science and political theory has begun to show how they informed the claims and premises of each other. This scholarship, however, has been too ready to use Newtonian physics, largely a science of space, as a placeholder for eighteenth-century natural knowledge. Important developments in the understanding of matter had similarly profound implications for political thought. In this essay, I adapt Foucault's theorization of the body as a site of discursive struggle to examine the confluence of political and medico-chemical science in Tobias Smollett's The Expedition of Humphry Clinker (1771). Smollett diagnoses Britain's ailing political body, which was exposed at midcentury to commercial bombardment and moral decay threatening national disintegration. The titular Humphry Clinker is offered as ethical model and coagulative remedy. A vagrant religious enthusiast, Clinker's disruptive practices display, nonetheless, the curative potential of an economy of ethical obligation, which would reinforce failing commercial and legal ligaments in Leviathan's body by catalyzing interpersonal bonds.","PeriodicalId":82853,"journal":{"name":"Studies on Voltaire and the eighteenth century","volume":"1 1","pages":"23 - 44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies on Voltaire and the eighteenth century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ECY.2019.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT:The limited scholarship concerning cross-pollination between eighteenth-century science and political theory has begun to show how they informed the claims and premises of each other. This scholarship, however, has been too ready to use Newtonian physics, largely a science of space, as a placeholder for eighteenth-century natural knowledge. Important developments in the understanding of matter had similarly profound implications for political thought. In this essay, I adapt Foucault's theorization of the body as a site of discursive struggle to examine the confluence of political and medico-chemical science in Tobias Smollett's The Expedition of Humphry Clinker (1771). Smollett diagnoses Britain's ailing political body, which was exposed at midcentury to commercial bombardment and moral decay threatening national disintegration. The titular Humphry Clinker is offered as ethical model and coagulative remedy. A vagrant religious enthusiast, Clinker's disruptive practices display, nonetheless, the curative potential of an economy of ethical obligation, which would reinforce failing commercial and legal ligaments in Leviathan's body by catalyzing interpersonal bonds.
被上帝的“油脂”所拯救:斯莫列特的《汉弗莱·克林克》中政治体的病理
摘要:关于18世纪科学与政治理论之间的“异花授粉”的有限学术研究已经开始揭示它们是如何相互影响主张和前提的。然而,这种学术太容易把牛顿物理学(主要是一门空间科学)作为18世纪自然知识的占位符。对物质理解的重要发展同样对政治思想产生了深远的影响。在这篇文章中,我改编了福柯的身体理论,将其作为话语斗争的场所,以考察托比亚斯·斯莫列特的《汉弗莱·克林克的远征》(1771)中政治和医学化学科学的融合。斯莫利特诊断了英国病态的政治体系,它在本世纪中叶暴露在商业轰炸和道德败坏的威胁下,威胁着国家的解体。名义上的汉弗莱·克林克被提供作为伦理模范和凝固疗法。作为一个流浪的宗教狂热者,Clinker的破坏性行为显示了道德义务经济的治疗潜力,它将通过催化人际关系来加强利维坦身体中失败的商业和法律韧带。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书