Use of Deleuze’s process ontology

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Hyeyoung Maeng
{"title":"Use of Deleuze’s process ontology","authors":"Hyeyoung Maeng","doi":"10.1080/14702029.2020.1742001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper aims to explore the clinical use of Gilles Deleuze’s philosophical concepts such as repetition, virtuality, multiplicity, and difference of intensity, which together comprise his process ontology. I argue that Deleuze’s process ontology forms the basis of his transcendental aesthetics of sensation, specifically by focusing on his earlier work prior to his collaboration with Félix Guattari. This investigation uses the concepts of Agencement machinic as a method to study Deleuze’s aesthetics which is based on his establishment of nondiscursive art and nonverbal semiotics. This paper also argues that the displacement of Plato’s Idea by Deleuze’s intensive multiplicity endows a work of art with the highest ontological status in Deleuze’s transcendental empiricism. Throughout this paper, Deleuze’s process ontology is understood, used, and reinvented through the Documentation Art project, which creates experimental video art pieces from the digital documentation of the processes of Korean Bunche paintings, while not reducing a work of art to an expression of certain concepts. As a result, this paper shows how Documentation Art rejects the notion of representation stemming from Kant’s transcendental aesthetic, by making the invisible painting process visible, and explores unseen experimental capacities in Korean painting practices through the artistic singularization processes.","PeriodicalId":35077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Visual Art Practice","volume":"20 1","pages":"160 - 178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Visual Art Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14702029.2020.1742001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper aims to explore the clinical use of Gilles Deleuze’s philosophical concepts such as repetition, virtuality, multiplicity, and difference of intensity, which together comprise his process ontology. I argue that Deleuze’s process ontology forms the basis of his transcendental aesthetics of sensation, specifically by focusing on his earlier work prior to his collaboration with Félix Guattari. This investigation uses the concepts of Agencement machinic as a method to study Deleuze’s aesthetics which is based on his establishment of nondiscursive art and nonverbal semiotics. This paper also argues that the displacement of Plato’s Idea by Deleuze’s intensive multiplicity endows a work of art with the highest ontological status in Deleuze’s transcendental empiricism. Throughout this paper, Deleuze’s process ontology is understood, used, and reinvented through the Documentation Art project, which creates experimental video art pieces from the digital documentation of the processes of Korean Bunche paintings, while not reducing a work of art to an expression of certain concepts. As a result, this paper shows how Documentation Art rejects the notion of representation stemming from Kant’s transcendental aesthetic, by making the invisible painting process visible, and explores unseen experimental capacities in Korean painting practices through the artistic singularization processes.
德勒兹过程本体论的运用
摘要本文旨在探讨吉尔·德勒兹过程本体论中重复、虚拟、多重、强度差异等哲学概念的临床运用。我认为德勒兹的过程本体论形成了他的先验感觉美学的基础,特别是通过关注他与f lix瓜塔里合作之前的早期工作。本研究以“协议机制”的概念为研究方法,探讨德勒兹建立在非话语艺术和非言语符号学基础上的美学思想。本文还认为,德勒兹强烈的多重性取代了柏拉图的理念,使一件艺术作品在德勒兹的先验经验主义中具有最高的本体论地位。在本文中,德勒兹的过程本体通过文献艺术项目被理解、使用和重新发明,该项目从韩国束画过程的数字文档中创造了实验性的视频艺术作品,而不是将艺术作品简化为某种概念的表达。因此,本文展示了文献艺术如何通过将不可见的绘画过程变得可见,来拒绝康德先验美学的再现概念,并通过艺术的单一性过程探索韩国绘画实践中不可见的实验能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Visual Art Practice
Journal of Visual Art Practice Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Journal of Visual Art Practice (JVAP) is a forum of debate and inquiry for research in art. JVAP is concerned with visual art practice including the social, economic, political and cultural frames within which the formal concerns of art and visual art practice are located. The journal is concerned with research engaged in these disciplines, and with the contested ideas of knowledge formed through that research. JVAP welcomes submissions that explore new theories of research and practice and work on the practical and educational impact of visual arts research. JVAP recognises the diversity of research in art and visual arts, and as such, we encourage contributions from scholarly and pure research, as well as developmental, applied and pedagogical research. In addition to established scholars, we welcome and are supportive of submissions from new contributors including doctoral researchers. We seek contributions engaged with, but not limited to, these themes: -Art, visual art and research into practitioners'' methods and methodologies -Art , visual art, big data, technology, and social change -Art, visual art, and urban planning -Art, visual art, ethics and the public sphere -Art, visual art, representations and translation -Art, visual art, and philosophy -Art, visual art, methods, histories and beliefs -Art, visual art, neuroscience and the social brain -Art, visual art, and economics -Art, visual art, politics and power -Art, visual art, vision and visuality -Art, visual art, and social practice -Art, visual art, and the methodology of arts based research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信