Aquatic Therapy Reduces Pain and Fatigue in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review

IF 1 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Karsten Barbagelata, Jacqueline Eadi, M. McNamara, Melissa Sayles, James M. Smith
{"title":"Aquatic Therapy Reduces Pain and Fatigue in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review","authors":"Karsten Barbagelata, Jacqueline Eadi, M. McNamara, Melissa Sayles, James M. Smith","doi":"10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Purpose: Pain and cancer-related fatigue (CRF) are impairments from breast cancer or the medical and surgical therapies for breast cancer. Aquatic therapy has been found to be effective for the problems of pain and CRF. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine whether aquatic therapy reduced pain and CRF among people with breast cancer and to identify any elements of aquatic therapy associated with those effects. Methods: The protocol for this systematic review was registered with PROSPERO, and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) standards were followed. Four databases were searched, and studies were selected on the basis of predetermined criteria. Data were extracted into a template for analysis and thematic synthesis. Measures of methodological quality (risk of bias) and level of evidence were applied. Results: Six studies involving 137 subjects who received treatment were included. Subjects received aquatic therapy (water-based exercise for rehabilitation) that was compared with various land-based interventions. Studies were evaluated with the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine—Levels of Evidence for Therapy/Prevention Studies Rating Scale, and all studies had a high or acceptable level of evidence. Studies were evaluated with the APTA Critical Appraisal Tool for Experimental Intervention Studies, and 5 studies had a high or acceptable quality. High-quality evidence supported the use of aquatic therapy for reducing CRF, and acceptable quality evidence supported the use of aquatic therapy for reducing pain. Adverse responses to aquatic therapy were minor symptoms that resolved within days and had no effect on attrition. Limitations: Searches were limited to publications in English. Analysis was confounded by heterogeneity of pain measures. Conclusions: Aquatic therapy is recommended as an intervention for the impairments of pain and CRF associated with breast cancer. Aquatic therapy is safe and feasible for this population.","PeriodicalId":54153,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Oncology","volume":"33 1","pages":"E35 - E41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.REO.0000000000000247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Pain and cancer-related fatigue (CRF) are impairments from breast cancer or the medical and surgical therapies for breast cancer. Aquatic therapy has been found to be effective for the problems of pain and CRF. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine whether aquatic therapy reduced pain and CRF among people with breast cancer and to identify any elements of aquatic therapy associated with those effects. Methods: The protocol for this systematic review was registered with PROSPERO, and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) standards were followed. Four databases were searched, and studies were selected on the basis of predetermined criteria. Data were extracted into a template for analysis and thematic synthesis. Measures of methodological quality (risk of bias) and level of evidence were applied. Results: Six studies involving 137 subjects who received treatment were included. Subjects received aquatic therapy (water-based exercise for rehabilitation) that was compared with various land-based interventions. Studies were evaluated with the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine—Levels of Evidence for Therapy/Prevention Studies Rating Scale, and all studies had a high or acceptable level of evidence. Studies were evaluated with the APTA Critical Appraisal Tool for Experimental Intervention Studies, and 5 studies had a high or acceptable quality. High-quality evidence supported the use of aquatic therapy for reducing CRF, and acceptable quality evidence supported the use of aquatic therapy for reducing pain. Adverse responses to aquatic therapy were minor symptoms that resolved within days and had no effect on attrition. Limitations: Searches were limited to publications in English. Analysis was confounded by heterogeneity of pain measures. Conclusions: Aquatic therapy is recommended as an intervention for the impairments of pain and CRF associated with breast cancer. Aquatic therapy is safe and feasible for this population.
水生疗法减少乳腺癌幸存者的疼痛和疲劳:一项系统综述
背景和目的:疼痛和癌症相关疲劳(CRF)是乳腺癌或乳腺癌内科和外科治疗的损伤。水疗法已被发现是有效的问题,疼痛和慢性肾功能衰竭。本系统综述的目的是确定水疗法是否能减轻乳腺癌患者的疼痛和慢性肾功能衰竭,并确定水疗法中与这些效果相关的任何因素。方法:本系统评价的方案已在PROSPERO注册,并遵循PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)标准。检索了四个数据库,并根据预先确定的标准选择了研究。数据被提取到一个模板中进行分析和专题综合。采用了方法学质量(偏倚风险)和证据水平的措施。结果:纳入6项研究,共137名接受治疗的受试者。受试者接受水生疗法(以水为基础的康复运动),并与各种陆上干预措施进行比较。使用牛津循证医学中心-治疗/预防研究证据水平评定量表对研究进行评估,所有研究的证据水平均为高水平或可接受水平。采用APTA实验干预研究关键评估工具对研究进行评估,其中5项研究质量较高或可接受。高质量的证据支持使用水疗法来减少CRF,可接受的质量证据支持使用水疗法来减轻疼痛。对水疗法的不良反应是轻微的症状,在几天内消退,对消耗没有影响。局限性:检索仅限于英文出版物。分析因疼痛测量的异质性而混淆。结论:水中疗法可作为乳腺癌相关疼痛和CRF损伤的干预措施。水疗法对这一人群是安全可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
22.20%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信