Left Ventricle Segmentation in Cardiac MR: A Systematic Mapping of the Past Decade

Matheus A. O. Ribeiro, Fátima L. S. Nunes
{"title":"Left Ventricle Segmentation in Cardiac MR: A Systematic Mapping of the Past Decade","authors":"Matheus A. O. Ribeiro, Fátima L. S. Nunes","doi":"10.1145/3517190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Left ventricle segmentation in short-axis cardiac magnetic resonance images is important to diagnose heart disease. However, repetitive manual segmentation of these images requires considerable human effort and can decrease diagnostic accuracy. In recent years, several fully and semi-automatic approaches have been proposed, mainly using image-based, atlas, graph, deformable model, and artificial intelligence methods. This article presents a systematic mapping on left ventricle segmentation, considering 74 studies published in the past decade. The main contributions of this review are definition of the main segmentation challenges in these images; proposal of a new schematization, dividing the segmentation process into stages; categorization and analysis of the segmentation methods, including hybrid combinations; and analysis of the evaluation process, metrics, and databases. The performance of the methods in the most used public database is assessed, and the main limitations, weaknesses, and strengths of each method category are presented. Finally, trends, challenges, and research opportunities are discussed. The analysis indicates that methods from all categories can achieve good performance, and hybrid methods combining deep learning and deformable models obtain the best results. Methods still fail in specific slices, segment wrong regions, and produce anatomically impossible segmentations.","PeriodicalId":7000,"journal":{"name":"ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)","volume":"42 1","pages":"1 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3517190","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Left ventricle segmentation in short-axis cardiac magnetic resonance images is important to diagnose heart disease. However, repetitive manual segmentation of these images requires considerable human effort and can decrease diagnostic accuracy. In recent years, several fully and semi-automatic approaches have been proposed, mainly using image-based, atlas, graph, deformable model, and artificial intelligence methods. This article presents a systematic mapping on left ventricle segmentation, considering 74 studies published in the past decade. The main contributions of this review are definition of the main segmentation challenges in these images; proposal of a new schematization, dividing the segmentation process into stages; categorization and analysis of the segmentation methods, including hybrid combinations; and analysis of the evaluation process, metrics, and databases. The performance of the methods in the most used public database is assessed, and the main limitations, weaknesses, and strengths of each method category are presented. Finally, trends, challenges, and research opportunities are discussed. The analysis indicates that methods from all categories can achieve good performance, and hybrid methods combining deep learning and deformable models obtain the best results. Methods still fail in specific slices, segment wrong regions, and produce anatomically impossible segmentations.
心脏磁共振左心室分割:过去十年的系统映射
心脏短轴磁共振图像左心室分割对心脏病的诊断具有重要意义。然而,这些图像的重复人工分割需要大量的人力,并且会降低诊断的准确性。近年来,人们提出了几种全自动和半自动的方法,主要是基于图像的、地图集的、图形的、可变形模型的和人工智能的方法。本文介绍了一个系统的映射左心室分割,考虑74个研究发表在过去的十年。本综述的主要贡献是定义了这些图像中的主要分割挑战;提出一种新的图式,将分割过程分为几个阶段;分割方法的分类和分析,包括混合组合;以及对评估过程、指标和数据库的分析。评估了常用的公共数据库中方法的性能,并介绍了每种方法的主要局限性、弱点和优势。最后,讨论了趋势、挑战和研究机会。分析表明,所有类别的方法都能获得较好的性能,其中结合深度学习和可变形模型的混合方法效果最好。方法在特定切片中仍然失败,分割错误的区域,并产生解剖学上不可能的分割。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信