On the Rule and the Use of Precedents: Brief Comments on the Works of Fabio Pulido Ortiz and Silvia Zorzetto

Q4 Social Sciences
Álvar Núñez
{"title":"On the Rule and the Use of Precedents: Brief Comments on the Works of Fabio Pulido Ortiz and Silvia Zorzetto","authors":"Álvar Núñez","doi":"10.22201/iij.24487937e.2022.16.5.17583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It filled me with pleasure to be asked by Problema editor-in-chief Sandra Gómora Juárez to lead a discussion on the theories and doctrine on precedent in our context alongside Prof. Marina Gascón Abellán. Besides the undeniable and recognized prestige of the Problema journal, there was also the possibility of working with Prof. Marina Gascón again and with Sandra Gómora for the first time. It was also an opportunity to discuss issues regarding precedent with old friends like Flavia Carbonell, Fabio Pulido and Silvia Zorzetto, and exchange opinions with new ones like Rodrigo Camarena.   On this occasion, I would like to comment specifically on the works of Prof. Fabio Pulido Ortiz and Prof. Silvia Zorzetto, both of which are of unquestionable quality. The article by Prof. Pulido Ortiz of the Universidad de la Sabana in Colombia is a work of analytical finesse and subtlety that discusses some fundamental problems of legal theory from the standpoint of the theory of precedent. Prof. Silvia Zorzetto from Università Statale di Milano has conducted an analytical and metalinguistic survey of the use of precedents in Italy, particularly at the Italian Sezioni Unite Civili della Corte di Cassazione. This work is priceless not only in terms of its value as a study of (internal) Italian legal culture, but also because the analysis can be generalized, at least in part, to explain how precedents are used in civil law systems.","PeriodicalId":53459,"journal":{"name":"Problema","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problema","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24487937e.2022.16.5.17583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It filled me with pleasure to be asked by Problema editor-in-chief Sandra Gómora Juárez to lead a discussion on the theories and doctrine on precedent in our context alongside Prof. Marina Gascón Abellán. Besides the undeniable and recognized prestige of the Problema journal, there was also the possibility of working with Prof. Marina Gascón again and with Sandra Gómora for the first time. It was also an opportunity to discuss issues regarding precedent with old friends like Flavia Carbonell, Fabio Pulido and Silvia Zorzetto, and exchange opinions with new ones like Rodrigo Camarena.   On this occasion, I would like to comment specifically on the works of Prof. Fabio Pulido Ortiz and Prof. Silvia Zorzetto, both of which are of unquestionable quality. The article by Prof. Pulido Ortiz of the Universidad de la Sabana in Colombia is a work of analytical finesse and subtlety that discusses some fundamental problems of legal theory from the standpoint of the theory of precedent. Prof. Silvia Zorzetto from Università Statale di Milano has conducted an analytical and metalinguistic survey of the use of precedents in Italy, particularly at the Italian Sezioni Unite Civili della Corte di Cassazione. This work is priceless not only in terms of its value as a study of (internal) Italian legal culture, but also because the analysis can be generalized, at least in part, to explain how precedents are used in civil law systems.
规则与先例运用:法比奥·普利多·奥尔蒂斯与西尔维娅·佐泽托作品简评
我很高兴应邀由Problema总编辑Sandra Gómora Juárez与Marina教授Gascón Abellán共同主持一场关于先例的理论和原则的讨论。除了《问题》杂志无可否认和公认的声望之外,还有可能再次与Marina教授Gascón合作,并首次与Sandra Gómora合作。这也是一个与弗拉维亚·卡博内尔、法比奥·普利多和西尔维娅·佐泽托等老朋友讨论先例问题,并与罗德里戈·卡马雷纳等新朋友交换意见的机会。借此机会,我想特别评论一下法比奥·普利多·奥尔蒂斯教授和西尔维娅·佐泽托教授的著作,他们两人的质量都不容置疑。哥伦比亚萨巴纳大学的普利多·奥尔蒂斯教授的这篇文章从先例理论的角度探讨了法理的一些基本问题,是一篇分析巧妙而微妙的作品。米兰州立大学的Silvia Zorzetto教授对意大利的先例使用情况进行了分析和元语言学调查,特别是在意大利卡萨齐奥尼联合民事委员会。这项工作是无价的,不仅因为它作为(内部)意大利法律文化研究的价值,而且因为分析可以概括,至少部分地,解释判例是如何在大陆法系中使用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Problema
Problema Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal Problema is a yearbook of Philosophy and Theory of Law of the Institute of Legal Research of the UNAM. The objective of the journal is to publish submissions in Spanish and English, and is aimed at professors, students and professionals interested in various contemporary issues of political, legal and moral philosophy. That is why the Editorial Committee is constituted by researchers from the Institute of Legal Research experts in the field. It is important to note that the Journal Problema has a process of judgment under the double-blind principle, which is carried out by the members of the Editorial Board, which is constituted by national and international researchers from various institutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信