Janice débora De alencar batista Araújo, Rebeka Magalhães da Costa, Ana maria Monte coelho Frota
{"title":"de chrónos à aión – onde habitam os tempos da infância?","authors":"Janice débora De alencar batista Araújo, Rebeka Magalhães da Costa, Ana maria Monte coelho Frota","doi":"10.12957/childphilo.2021.56866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article reflects on childhood times based on the words chrónos, kairós and aión, which the Greeks use to conceptualize time, in dialogue with different authors, such as Kohan (2007, 2009, 2018), Pohlmann (2005), Skliar (2018), Kohan and Fernandes (2020). In the pedagogical field, we explore how Pedagogy of Childhood has focused on the importance of childhood temporality and children’s agency, with contributions from Hoyuelos (2020), Parrini (2016), Aguilera et al. (2020), Barbosa (2013), Oliveira-Formosinho e Araújo (2013), Oliveira-Formosinho (2018), Pinazza and Gobbi (2014). We reflect on what forms of organizing time are possible when we think about children and their childhoods. Would it be a continuous and chronological time, a time of opportunity for the instant (kairos) or the timeless intensity of the aiónic? Would it be possible to open spaces in school for other temporalities, given its immersion in chronological time (chronos), and its extreme emphasis on routine? We seek a relationship between forms of temporality, philosophy, and early education in order to explore alternative possibilities in the relationship between child and the school context, and conclude that, since the child’s is the aiónic time of intense experience, it is in the heightened dynamic immediacy and the multiple symbolic languages of play that it may be possible to create pedagogical structures that provide a dwelling for childhood temporality. ","PeriodicalId":42107,"journal":{"name":"Childhood and Philosophy","volume":"35 1","pages":"01-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Childhood and Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12957/childphilo.2021.56866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article reflects on childhood times based on the words chrónos, kairós and aión, which the Greeks use to conceptualize time, in dialogue with different authors, such as Kohan (2007, 2009, 2018), Pohlmann (2005), Skliar (2018), Kohan and Fernandes (2020). In the pedagogical field, we explore how Pedagogy of Childhood has focused on the importance of childhood temporality and children’s agency, with contributions from Hoyuelos (2020), Parrini (2016), Aguilera et al. (2020), Barbosa (2013), Oliveira-Formosinho e Araújo (2013), Oliveira-Formosinho (2018), Pinazza and Gobbi (2014). We reflect on what forms of organizing time are possible when we think about children and their childhoods. Would it be a continuous and chronological time, a time of opportunity for the instant (kairos) or the timeless intensity of the aiónic? Would it be possible to open spaces in school for other temporalities, given its immersion in chronological time (chronos), and its extreme emphasis on routine? We seek a relationship between forms of temporality, philosophy, and early education in order to explore alternative possibilities in the relationship between child and the school context, and conclude that, since the child’s is the aiónic time of intense experience, it is in the heightened dynamic immediacy and the multiple symbolic languages of play that it may be possible to create pedagogical structures that provide a dwelling for childhood temporality.
本文通过与Kohan(2007年、2009年、2018年)、Pohlmann(2005年)、Skliar(2018年)、Kohan和Fernandes(2020年)等不同作者的对话,以希腊人用来概念化时间的chrónos、kairós和aión这三个词为基础,反思童年时代。在教学领域,我们探讨了儿童教育学如何关注儿童时间性和儿童代理的重要性,并得到了Hoyuelos(2020)、Parrini(2016)、Aguilera等人(2020)、Barbosa(2013)、Oliveira-Formosinho e Araújo(2013)、Oliveira-Formosinho(2018)、Pinazza和Gobbi(2014)的贡献。当我们想到孩子和他们的童年时,我们会思考安排时间的可能形式。它是一个连续的、按时间顺序排列的时间,是一个瞬间(kairos)的机会时间,还是aiónic的永恒强度时间?考虑到它在时间顺序上的沉浸,以及它对常规的极端强调,有没有可能在学校里为其他暂时性的东西开放空间呢?我们寻求暂时性形式、哲学和早期教育之间的关系,以探索儿童与学校环境之间关系的其他可能性,并得出结论,由于儿童是aiónic强烈体验的时间,因此在高度动态的即时性和游戏的多种符号语言中,有可能创造出为儿童暂时性提供住所的教学结构。