Reporting guidelines for medicinal plant extracts used in pharmacological and toxicological research: ConPhyMP

M. Heinrich, B. Jalil, Mona Abdel-Tawab, J. Echeverría, Ž. Kulić, L. McGaw, J. Pezzuto, O. Potterat, Jia-bo Wang
{"title":"Reporting guidelines for medicinal plant extracts used in pharmacological and toxicological research: ConPhyMP","authors":"M. Heinrich, B. Jalil, Mona Abdel-Tawab, J. Echeverría, Ž. Kulić, L. McGaw, J. Pezzuto, O. Potterat, Jia-bo Wang","doi":"10.5920/bjpharm.1123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary: Every year, the number of studies that evaluate the pharmacological effects, (clinical) efficacy or the toxicity of medicinal plant extracts is constantly increasing, but the reporting quality remains unsatisfactory. One of the main reasons is that there is a lack of detailed reporting standards for guidance. In response to this long-standing challenge, a core group of nine experts with proficiency in phytochemical analysis, including editors-in-chief of leading specialist journals, and based in different research settings globally, developed the Consensus based reporting guidelines for Phytochemical Characterisation of Medicinal Plant extracts (ConPhyMP) through a multi-staged development process. This incorporated a) a global survey among medicinal plant researchers, b) a core group, who reviewed and developed the guidelines through a Delphi process, and c) an advisory group of 20 experts, including editors of leading journals and scientific societies in medicinal plants research, who provided feedback and sanctioned the final guidelines. The ConPhyMP guidelines comprise two tables with accompanying explanatory figures. The first table provides recommendations for reporting the starting material and its initial processing, and the second table presents recommendations for conducting and reporting the analytical methods for defining the chemical profile based on the type of extracts used in the research. The group hopes that the ConPhyMP will support authors as well as peer reviewers and editors assessing these studies for publication and assist the production of evidence-based guidance of studies utilising medicinal plant extracts.","PeriodicalId":9253,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Pharmacy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5920/bjpharm.1123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Summary: Every year, the number of studies that evaluate the pharmacological effects, (clinical) efficacy or the toxicity of medicinal plant extracts is constantly increasing, but the reporting quality remains unsatisfactory. One of the main reasons is that there is a lack of detailed reporting standards for guidance. In response to this long-standing challenge, a core group of nine experts with proficiency in phytochemical analysis, including editors-in-chief of leading specialist journals, and based in different research settings globally, developed the Consensus based reporting guidelines for Phytochemical Characterisation of Medicinal Plant extracts (ConPhyMP) through a multi-staged development process. This incorporated a) a global survey among medicinal plant researchers, b) a core group, who reviewed and developed the guidelines through a Delphi process, and c) an advisory group of 20 experts, including editors of leading journals and scientific societies in medicinal plants research, who provided feedback and sanctioned the final guidelines. The ConPhyMP guidelines comprise two tables with accompanying explanatory figures. The first table provides recommendations for reporting the starting material and its initial processing, and the second table presents recommendations for conducting and reporting the analytical methods for defining the chemical profile based on the type of extracts used in the research. The group hopes that the ConPhyMP will support authors as well as peer reviewers and editors assessing these studies for publication and assist the production of evidence-based guidance of studies utilising medicinal plant extracts.
药理学和毒理学研究中使用的药用植物提取物报告指南:ConPhyMP
摘要:每年对药用植物提取物的药理作用、(临床)疗效或毒性进行评价的研究不断增多,但报道质量仍不理想。其中一个主要原因是缺乏详细的报告标准作为指导。为了应对这一长期存在的挑战,一个由9名精通植物化学分析的专家组成的核心小组,包括来自全球不同研究机构的主要专业期刊的主编,通过多阶段的开发过程,制定了基于共识的药用植物提取物植物化学表征报告指南(ConPhyMP)。这包括:a)对药用植物研究人员进行全球调查;b)一个核心小组,通过德尔菲过程审查和制定指南;c)一个由20名专家组成的咨询小组,包括药用植物研究领域主要期刊和科学学会的编辑,他们提供反馈并批准最终指南。ConPhyMP指南包括两个附有解释性数字的表格。第一个表提供了报告起始材料及其初始处理的建议,第二个表提供了根据研究中使用的提取物类型确定化学概况的分析方法的指导和报告的建议。该小组希望ConPhyMP将支持作者以及同行审稿人和编辑评估这些研究以供发表,并协助制作利用药用植物提取物的基于证据的研究指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信