Ozone Therapy as a Minimally-invasive Alternative in patients with Acute Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IF 0.2 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
F. Salehpour, Davoud Aghamohammadi, F. Mirzaei, Ebrahim Rafiei, J. Aghazadeh, Seyed Reza Javaheri, Seyed Ahmad Naseri Alavi, A. Iranmehr
{"title":"Ozone Therapy as a Minimally-invasive Alternative in patients with Acute Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Randomized Clinical Trial","authors":"F. Salehpour, Davoud Aghamohammadi, F. Mirzaei, Ebrahim Rafiei, J. Aghazadeh, Seyed Reza Javaheri, Seyed Ahmad Naseri Alavi, A. Iranmehr","doi":"10.30491/TM.2021.278799.1267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Low back pain (LBP) management via conservative therapy with intervention fails in some cases. However, there are still many challenges to choose the best choice. Minimally-invasive techniques such as ozone therapy are emerging choices for surgery.Objective: We evaluated the effects of ozone therapy on patients with LBP with protruding disc herniation who failed to respond to medical treatment.Methods: In this Randomized phase III clinical trial (2017-19), one hundred patients admitted to Imam Reza Hospital (Tabriz-Iran) for herniated disk-induced LBP were randomly divided (shape- and color-identical envelopes) into two case and control groups. Patients in the case group were treated with ozone therapy (25 mcg/mL in 5 cc volume) plus medical therapy (naproxen 500 mg and baclofen 10 mg, both two times a day). Alternatively, patients in the control group received only conventional medical therapy. Primary outcomes such as changes in pain intensity (VAS) and basal test before and after treatment and also secondary outcomes like the amount of analgesic used were evaluated in the patients during two weeks, three months and six months after surgery. Student T-test and Chi-square were compared for comparing the data.Results: Mean pain intensities estimated by VAS and improvement of restless leg syndrome were not significantly different between the two groups during two weeks (p =0.8), three months (p =0.5) and six months (p =0.9) after the intervention. Pain intensity was found to be lower in both groups after the intervention compared with before treatment (p =0.001 for both). Moreover, significant differences were found between two groups in the Lasegue test during two weeks (p =0.02) and six months (p =0.01) after the intervention.Conclusion: Application of ozone therapy not only improves clinical pain syndrome in LBP patients but also leads to improved medical treatment in these patients.","PeriodicalId":23249,"journal":{"name":"Trauma monthly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma monthly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30491/TM.2021.278799.1267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low back pain (LBP) management via conservative therapy with intervention fails in some cases. However, there are still many challenges to choose the best choice. Minimally-invasive techniques such as ozone therapy are emerging choices for surgery.Objective: We evaluated the effects of ozone therapy on patients with LBP with protruding disc herniation who failed to respond to medical treatment.Methods: In this Randomized phase III clinical trial (2017-19), one hundred patients admitted to Imam Reza Hospital (Tabriz-Iran) for herniated disk-induced LBP were randomly divided (shape- and color-identical envelopes) into two case and control groups. Patients in the case group were treated with ozone therapy (25 mcg/mL in 5 cc volume) plus medical therapy (naproxen 500 mg and baclofen 10 mg, both two times a day). Alternatively, patients in the control group received only conventional medical therapy. Primary outcomes such as changes in pain intensity (VAS) and basal test before and after treatment and also secondary outcomes like the amount of analgesic used were evaluated in the patients during two weeks, three months and six months after surgery. Student T-test and Chi-square were compared for comparing the data.Results: Mean pain intensities estimated by VAS and improvement of restless leg syndrome were not significantly different between the two groups during two weeks (p =0.8), three months (p =0.5) and six months (p =0.9) after the intervention. Pain intensity was found to be lower in both groups after the intervention compared with before treatment (p =0.001 for both). Moreover, significant differences were found between two groups in the Lasegue test during two weeks (p =0.02) and six months (p =0.01) after the intervention.Conclusion: Application of ozone therapy not only improves clinical pain syndrome in LBP patients but also leads to improved medical treatment in these patients.
臭氧治疗作为急性腰椎间盘突出症患者的一种微创选择:一项随机临床试验
背景:腰痛(LBP)通过保守治疗和干预治疗在某些情况下失败。然而,选择最好的选择仍然有许多挑战。像臭氧治疗这样的微创技术是外科手术的新兴选择。目的:探讨臭氧治疗对腰痛合并椎间盘突出症治疗无效的疗效。方法:在这项随机III期临床试验(2017- 2019)中,100名因椎间盘突出性腰痛而入院的伊玛目礼萨医院(Tabriz-Iran)患者(形状和颜色相同的包膜)随机分为两组。病例组患者采用臭氧治疗(25mcg /mL, 5cc体积)加药物治疗(萘普生500 mg和巴氯芬10 mg,每日2次)。另外,对照组患者仅接受常规药物治疗。在手术后2周、3个月和6个月评估患者的主要结局,如疼痛强度(VAS)变化和治疗前后的基础测试,以及次要结局,如止痛药的使用量。比较数据采用学生t检验和卡方检验。结果:两组患者在干预后2周(p =0.8)、3个月(p =0.5)和6个月(p =0.9), VAS评估的平均疼痛强度和不宁腿综合征的改善情况无显著差异。干预后两组患者的疼痛强度均低于治疗前(p =0.001)。两组在干预后2周(p =0.02)和6个月(p =0.01)的Lasegue测试也有显著差异。结论:臭氧疗法的应用不仅改善了腰痛患者的临床疼痛综合征,而且提高了腰痛患者的医疗水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trauma monthly
Trauma monthly EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信