Implementation of a Research Participant Satisfaction Survey at an Academic Medical Center.

P. Smailes, C. Reider, Rose Hallarn, L. Hafer, L. Wallace, W. Miser
{"title":"Implementation of a Research Participant Satisfaction Survey at an Academic Medical Center.","authors":"P. Smailes, C. Reider, Rose Hallarn, L. Hafer, L. Wallace, W. Miser","doi":"10.14524/CR-16-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This descriptive case study covers the development of a survey to assess research subject satisfaction among those participating in clinical research studies at an academic medical center (AMC). The purpose was twofold: to gauge the effectiveness of the survey, as well as to determine the level of satisfaction of the research participants. The authors developed and implemented an electronic research participant satisfaction survey. It was created to provide research teams at the authors' AMC with a common instrument to capture research participant experiences in order to improve upon the quality of research operations. The instrument captured participant responses in a standardized format. Ultimately, the results are to serve as a means to improve the research experience of participants for single studies, studies conducted within a division or department of the AMC, or across the entire research enterprise at the institution. For ease of use, the survey was created within an electronic data capture system known as REDCap, which is used by a consortium of more than 1,800 institutional partners as a tool from the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) program of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Participants in the survey described in this article were more than 18 years of age and participating in an institutional review board (IRB)-approved study. Results showed that the vast majority of participants surveyed had a positive experience engaging in research at the authors' AMC. Further, the tool was found to be effective in making that determination. The authors hope to expand the use of the survey as a means to increase research satisfaction and quality at their university.","PeriodicalId":90809,"journal":{"name":"Clinical researcher (Alexandria, Va.)","volume":"37 1","pages":"42-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical researcher (Alexandria, Va.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14524/CR-16-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

This descriptive case study covers the development of a survey to assess research subject satisfaction among those participating in clinical research studies at an academic medical center (AMC). The purpose was twofold: to gauge the effectiveness of the survey, as well as to determine the level of satisfaction of the research participants. The authors developed and implemented an electronic research participant satisfaction survey. It was created to provide research teams at the authors' AMC with a common instrument to capture research participant experiences in order to improve upon the quality of research operations. The instrument captured participant responses in a standardized format. Ultimately, the results are to serve as a means to improve the research experience of participants for single studies, studies conducted within a division or department of the AMC, or across the entire research enterprise at the institution. For ease of use, the survey was created within an electronic data capture system known as REDCap, which is used by a consortium of more than 1,800 institutional partners as a tool from the Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) program of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Participants in the survey described in this article were more than 18 years of age and participating in an institutional review board (IRB)-approved study. Results showed that the vast majority of participants surveyed had a positive experience engaging in research at the authors' AMC. Further, the tool was found to be effective in making that determination. The authors hope to expand the use of the survey as a means to increase research satisfaction and quality at their university.
某学术医疗中心研究参与者满意度调查之实施。
这个描述性案例研究涵盖了一项调查的发展,以评估在学术医学中心(AMC)参与临床研究的研究对象满意度。目的有两个:衡量调查的有效性,以及确定研究参与者的满意度。作者开发并实施了一项电子研究参与者满意度调查。它的创建是为了向作者所在的AMC的研究团队提供一个共同的工具,以获取研究参与者的经验,以提高研究业务的质量。该工具以标准化格式捕获参与者的回答。最终,结果将作为一种手段,用于改善单个研究参与者的研究体验,在AMC的一个部门或部门内进行的研究,或在机构的整个研究企业中进行的研究。为了便于使用,该调查是在一个名为REDCap的电子数据采集系统中创建的,该系统被一个由1800多家机构合作伙伴组成的联盟用作美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)临床和转化科学奖(CTSA)计划的工具。本文所述调查的参与者年龄均在18岁以上,并参与了机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的研究。结果显示,绝大多数被调查的参与者在作者的AMC进行研究时都有积极的经历。此外,人们发现该工具在作出这一决定方面是有效的。作者希望扩大调查的使用范围,作为提高大学研究满意度和质量的一种手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信