Meaning Representations of “Trans”, “Transgender”, “Transsexual” and “Tranny”: A Corpus-Based Analysis in Digital News and Magazines

IF 0.3 Q3 AREA STUDIES
Thayakorn Klomkaew, Monthon Knoakpermpoon
{"title":"Meaning Representations of “Trans”, “Transgender”, “Transsexual” and “Tranny”: A Corpus-Based Analysis in Digital News and Magazines","authors":"Thayakorn Klomkaew, Monthon Knoakpermpoon","doi":"10.48048/asi.2024.261016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this present study is to examine the English references in digital media that are commonly used to refer to the group of non-binary people and to explore the aspects of references used to portray their meanings towards LGBT people. The first-100 concordance lines of NOW Corpus were used as a main source of data. In order to analyze the data, two groups of the nodes: favorable terms (transgender and trans) and unfavorable terms (transsexual and tranny) were searched and analyzed by using descriptive percentage, thematic content analysis and corpus-driven discourse analysis. The findings revealed that the highest frequencies of references commonly used in digital news and magazines to refer to LGBT individuals are transgender and trans, respectively. Besides, two sub-themes were found in the concordance lines in terms of positive meanings: raising equality, showing advocacy and performance, and politics and policy and sarcastic or negative meanings: showing bias or discrimination, subgroup, abandonment and insecurity, difficulties and oppressions and derogatory and sexual desire. It can be concluded that some unfavorable terms are still underused in media, but they could reveal some positive meanings in terms of politics and policy. The implementations of study are that the meanings of some LGBT terms are dynamic, and that when used in media, content writers need to be aware of different meanings and contexts of the words. ","PeriodicalId":43547,"journal":{"name":"SOJOURN-Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOJOURN-Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48048/asi.2024.261016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this present study is to examine the English references in digital media that are commonly used to refer to the group of non-binary people and to explore the aspects of references used to portray their meanings towards LGBT people. The first-100 concordance lines of NOW Corpus were used as a main source of data. In order to analyze the data, two groups of the nodes: favorable terms (transgender and trans) and unfavorable terms (transsexual and tranny) were searched and analyzed by using descriptive percentage, thematic content analysis and corpus-driven discourse analysis. The findings revealed that the highest frequencies of references commonly used in digital news and magazines to refer to LGBT individuals are transgender and trans, respectively. Besides, two sub-themes were found in the concordance lines in terms of positive meanings: raising equality, showing advocacy and performance, and politics and policy and sarcastic or negative meanings: showing bias or discrimination, subgroup, abandonment and insecurity, difficulties and oppressions and derogatory and sexual desire. It can be concluded that some unfavorable terms are still underused in media, but they could reveal some positive meanings in terms of politics and policy. The implementations of study are that the meanings of some LGBT terms are dynamic, and that when used in media, content writers need to be aware of different meanings and contexts of the words. 
“Trans”、“Transgender”、“Transsexual”和“trananny”在数字新闻杂志中的意义表征:基于语料库的分析
本研究的目的是研究数字媒体中通常用于指代非二元性别人群的英语参考文献,并探索用于描述LGBT人群含义的参考文献的各个方面。以NOW语料库的前100条检索线为主要数据来源。为了对数据进行分析,通过描述性百分比、主题内容分析和语料库驱动话语分析,对两组节点:有利术语(transgender和trans)和不利术语(transsexual和trananny)进行搜索和分析。调查结果显示,在数字新闻和杂志中,提到LGBT群体的频率最高的分别是跨性别者和跨性别者。此外,从正面意义上看,在一致性行中发现了两个子主题:提高平等,表现倡导和表现;从政治和政策意义上发现了两个子主题;从讽喻或消极意义上发现了两个子主题:表现偏见或歧视,表现亚群体,表现抛弃和不安全感,表现困难和压迫,表现贬义和性欲。可以得出结论,一些不利的术语在媒体中仍然使用不足,但它们可以在政治和政策方面揭示一些积极的意义。研究的实现是,一些LGBT术语的含义是动态的,当在媒体中使用时,内容作者需要意识到这些词的不同含义和上下文。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信