Exposing the mess in the online kitchen: Bon Appetit and digital continuities in legacy media’s workplace exploitations

IF 2.4 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Emmelle Israel
{"title":"Exposing the mess in the online kitchen: Bon Appetit and digital continuities in legacy media’s workplace exploitations","authors":"Emmelle Israel","doi":"10.1177/13548565231193121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditional media’s convergence with online media platforms intensifies the already unpaid and unrecognized affective, immaterial and emotional labor expected of women of color and other historically marginalized media workers. This article uses the example of Bon Appetit (BA) and the downfall of their popular YouTube channel to argue that understanding this intensification is critical to envisioning possibilities for media workers to address exploitative working conditions. In the wake of Black Lives Matter uprisings in the summer of 2020, Black and Brown women food writers took to social media to point out that while BA profited from portraying a diverse workforce on their YouTube channel, the reality was very different. At the time, popular press and social media discourse largely attributed these issues to entrenched histories of racialized and gendered discrimination in legacy media. However, recent research on online platforms has engaged feminist studies, Black studies, and critical STS epistemologies to demonstrate that intersectional oppressions based on race, gender, class, and sexuality are reinscribed in the labor and technical infrastructures of platforms. Together, theorizations of the racialized and gendered aspects of unpaid and unrecognized labor alongside research on the biases reinscribed into algorithmic and internet platform infrastructures inform my analysis of a variety of texts related to the BA YouTube channel: BA YouTube channel metadata and videos, advertising trades coverage of Conde Nast’s digital media efforts, popular press coverage of the racial reckoning at Conde Nast and BA, and disclosures about BA and Conde Nast workplace cultures shared in public interviews by BA workers. By analyzing these texts together, I argue that the downfall of the BA YouTube channel demonstrates how media convergence and the platformization of legacy media intensifies racialized and gendered inequalities for media workers, but opportunities to publicly disclose these discriminatory workplace dynamics also galvanize worker organizing.","PeriodicalId":47242,"journal":{"name":"Convergence-The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Convergence-The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565231193121","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Traditional media’s convergence with online media platforms intensifies the already unpaid and unrecognized affective, immaterial and emotional labor expected of women of color and other historically marginalized media workers. This article uses the example of Bon Appetit (BA) and the downfall of their popular YouTube channel to argue that understanding this intensification is critical to envisioning possibilities for media workers to address exploitative working conditions. In the wake of Black Lives Matter uprisings in the summer of 2020, Black and Brown women food writers took to social media to point out that while BA profited from portraying a diverse workforce on their YouTube channel, the reality was very different. At the time, popular press and social media discourse largely attributed these issues to entrenched histories of racialized and gendered discrimination in legacy media. However, recent research on online platforms has engaged feminist studies, Black studies, and critical STS epistemologies to demonstrate that intersectional oppressions based on race, gender, class, and sexuality are reinscribed in the labor and technical infrastructures of platforms. Together, theorizations of the racialized and gendered aspects of unpaid and unrecognized labor alongside research on the biases reinscribed into algorithmic and internet platform infrastructures inform my analysis of a variety of texts related to the BA YouTube channel: BA YouTube channel metadata and videos, advertising trades coverage of Conde Nast’s digital media efforts, popular press coverage of the racial reckoning at Conde Nast and BA, and disclosures about BA and Conde Nast workplace cultures shared in public interviews by BA workers. By analyzing these texts together, I argue that the downfall of the BA YouTube channel demonstrates how media convergence and the platformization of legacy media intensifies racialized and gendered inequalities for media workers, but opportunities to publicly disclose these discriminatory workplace dynamics also galvanize worker organizing.
揭露网络厨房的混乱:祝你胃口好和传统媒体对工作场所的利用中的数字连续性
传统媒体与网络媒体平台的融合加剧了有色人种女性和其他历史上被边缘化的媒体工作者所期望的无报酬和未被认可的情感、非物质和情感劳动。本文以“好胃口”(Bon Appetit, BA)的例子,以及他们在YouTube上广受欢迎的频道的垮台,来说明理解这种加剧,对于媒体工作者解决剥削性工作条件的可能性是至关重要的。在2020年夏天“黑人的命也重要”(Black Lives Matter)运动爆发后,黑人和棕色人种的女性美食作家在社交媒体上指出,尽管英国航空公司通过在其YouTube频道上描绘一个多元化的员工群体而获利,但现实情况却大不相同。当时,大众媒体和社交媒体话语在很大程度上将这些问题归因于传统媒体中根深蒂固的种族化和性别歧视历史。然而,最近对在线平台的研究涉及了女权主义研究、黑人研究和批判性STS认识论,以证明基于种族、性别、阶级和性的交叉压迫被重新定义为平台的劳动和技术基础设施。综上所述,关于无偿和未被承认的劳动的种族化和性别化方面的理论,以及对重新编入算法和互联网平台基础设施的偏见的研究,为我对与BA YouTube频道相关的各种文本的分析提供了信息:英航YouTube频道的元数据和视频、广告交易对康泰纳仕数字媒体努力的报道、大众媒体对康泰纳仕和英航种族清算的报道,以及英航员工在公开采访中披露的英航和康泰纳仕的职场文化。通过对这些文本的综合分析,我认为英联YouTube频道的衰落表明,媒体融合和传统媒体的平台化如何加剧了媒体工作者的种族化和性别不平等,但公开披露这些歧视性工作场所动态的机会也激励了工人组织起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
98
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信