The Microbial Neck: A Biological Review of the Various Implant–Abutment Connections

IF 0.6 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Pronoy Mukhopadhyay, A. Khalikar, S. Wankhade, Suryakant Deogade
{"title":"The Microbial Neck: A Biological Review of the Various Implant–Abutment Connections","authors":"Pronoy Mukhopadhyay, A. Khalikar, S. Wankhade, Suryakant Deogade","doi":"10.1177/23202068211041785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study reviews the importance of selecting implant systems with connection designs that ensure better long-term prognosis of the prosthesis, thus placed. Materials and Methods: An electronic search on the PubMed database was done using MeSH keywords (“dental implant OR abutment OR connection AND microleakage OR bone loss”) to review English language articles published since the year 2011, which compared the crestal bone levels and microleakage around various implant–abutment connection designs (external hex, internal hex, and Morse taper). The search screened for articles on human trials and in vitro studies to be included within the review. Results: Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria applied to the preliminary search, a total of four articles were included in the review for evaluating the influence of connection type on peri-implant bone loss, while nine articles were included to study the influence on bacterial leakage across the implant–abutment interface. Conclusion: Based on the studies reviewed, the conical connection design proved to be the most biologically stable junctional geometry because of the better microbial seal and the lesser micromovement observed in these types of implants during functional loading. Moreover, this review even emphasizes the need for more longitudinal clinical trials to assess the microbial seal of these connection designs within the actual oral environment to evaluate long-term changes in the peri-implant tissues, and subsequently even factor the prognosis of the planned prosthetic intervention.","PeriodicalId":43017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","volume":"13 1","pages":"22 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Oral Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23202068211041785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study reviews the importance of selecting implant systems with connection designs that ensure better long-term prognosis of the prosthesis, thus placed. Materials and Methods: An electronic search on the PubMed database was done using MeSH keywords (“dental implant OR abutment OR connection AND microleakage OR bone loss”) to review English language articles published since the year 2011, which compared the crestal bone levels and microleakage around various implant–abutment connection designs (external hex, internal hex, and Morse taper). The search screened for articles on human trials and in vitro studies to be included within the review. Results: Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria applied to the preliminary search, a total of four articles were included in the review for evaluating the influence of connection type on peri-implant bone loss, while nine articles were included to study the influence on bacterial leakage across the implant–abutment interface. Conclusion: Based on the studies reviewed, the conical connection design proved to be the most biologically stable junctional geometry because of the better microbial seal and the lesser micromovement observed in these types of implants during functional loading. Moreover, this review even emphasizes the need for more longitudinal clinical trials to assess the microbial seal of these connection designs within the actual oral environment to evaluate long-term changes in the peri-implant tissues, and subsequently even factor the prognosis of the planned prosthetic intervention.
微生物颈部:各种种植体-基台连接的生物学综述
目的:本研究回顾了选择具有连接设计的种植体系统的重要性,以确保假体更好的长期预后,从而放置。材料和方法:使用MeSH关键词(“牙种植体或基台或连接和微渗漏或骨质流失”)对PubMed数据库进行电子检索,回顾2011年以来发表的英文文章,比较各种种植体-基台连接设计(外六角、内六角和莫尔斯锥度)的牙冠骨水平和微渗漏。搜索筛选了关于人体试验和体外研究的文章,以纳入审查。结果:根据初步检索的纳入和排除标准,评估连接类型对种植体周围骨丢失影响的文献共纳入4篇,研究对种植体-基牙界面细菌渗漏影响的文献共纳入9篇。结论:根据所回顾的研究,锥形连接设计被证明是生物学上最稳定的连接几何形状,因为在这些类型的植入物中,在功能负荷期间观察到更好的微生物密封和较少的微运动。此外,这篇综述甚至强调需要更多的纵向临床试验来评估这些连接设计在实际口腔环境中的微生物密封,以评估种植体周围组织的长期变化,随后甚至考虑到计划的假体干预的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Oral Research
Journal of Advanced Oral Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信