Review of the Public Financial Management Reform Strategy for Pacific Island Countries, 2010-2020

Richard I Allen, M. E. Rayess, L. Doherty, Priyanka Goel
{"title":"Review of the Public Financial Management Reform Strategy for Pacific Island Countries, 2010-2020","authors":"Richard I Allen, M. E. Rayess, L. Doherty, Priyanka Goel","doi":"10.5089/9781513556130.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper reviews the Public Financial Management (PFM) reform stategy for 16 Pacific Island Countries (PICs) during the period 2010-2020. The strategy was endorsed by the finance and economic ministers of the region (FEMM) in 2010. The paper analyzes more than 30 PEFA assessments carried out across the region. The region shares the generally slow pace of PFM reform that is also a feature of most developing countries. Some PICs have improved their PFM performance significantly, while others have done less well. PFM reforms have suffered from the small size and low capacity of many PICs, poorly designed PFM roadmaps, variable political suppport for reform, and vulnerability to natural disasters. The paper recommends that in the next five years, there should be a more granular and targeted approch to PEFAs. PICs should focus on basic PFM reforms and (where capacities allow) more transparent public finances, as well as better management of climate change considerations, public infrastructure, gender inequalities, and state-owned enterprises. Perseverance by countries in implementing reforms and leadership by finance ministries are critical. PFTAC’s advice is highly regarded across the region, and it could consider alternative modalities of CD delivery and stronger coordination with other development partners.","PeriodicalId":14326,"journal":{"name":"International Monetary Fund (IMF) Research Paper Series","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Monetary Fund (IMF) Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513556130.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper reviews the Public Financial Management (PFM) reform stategy for 16 Pacific Island Countries (PICs) during the period 2010-2020. The strategy was endorsed by the finance and economic ministers of the region (FEMM) in 2010. The paper analyzes more than 30 PEFA assessments carried out across the region. The region shares the generally slow pace of PFM reform that is also a feature of most developing countries. Some PICs have improved their PFM performance significantly, while others have done less well. PFM reforms have suffered from the small size and low capacity of many PICs, poorly designed PFM roadmaps, variable political suppport for reform, and vulnerability to natural disasters. The paper recommends that in the next five years, there should be a more granular and targeted approch to PEFAs. PICs should focus on basic PFM reforms and (where capacities allow) more transparent public finances, as well as better management of climate change considerations, public infrastructure, gender inequalities, and state-owned enterprises. Perseverance by countries in implementing reforms and leadership by finance ministries are critical. PFTAC’s advice is highly regarded across the region, and it could consider alternative modalities of CD delivery and stronger coordination with other development partners.
2010-2020年太平洋岛国公共财政管理改革战略审查
本文回顾了2010-2020年16个太平洋岛国的公共财政管理改革战略。该战略于2010年由该地区的财政和经济部长(FEMM)批准。本文分析了在该地区进行的30多项PEFA评估。该区域的方案管理改革步伐普遍缓慢,这也是大多数发展中国家的一个特点。一些PICs的PFM性能显著提高,而其他PICs的表现则不那么好。PFM改革受到以下因素的影响:许多国家的规模小、能力低、PFM路线图设计不佳、改革的政治支持多变以及易受自然灾害的影响。这篇论文建议,在未来五年内,应该对pefa采取更细致和更有针对性的方法。政策制定者应该把重点放在基本的PFM改革和(在能力允许的情况下)更透明的公共财政,以及更好地管理气候变化因素、公共基础设施、性别不平等和国有企业。各国坚持实施改革,以及各国财政部发挥领导作用至关重要。PFTAC的建议在整个区域受到高度重视,它可以考虑提供CD的其他方式,并加强与其他发展伙伴的协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信