Exercise interventions to prevent hamstring injuries in athletes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
R. Vatovec, Ž. Kozinc, N. Šarabon
{"title":"Exercise interventions to prevent hamstring injuries in athletes: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"R. Vatovec, Ž. Kozinc, N. Šarabon","doi":"10.1080/17461391.2019.1689300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of exercise-based interventions for prevention of hamstring injuries in sport. PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, ResearchGate, CINAHL, PEDro, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar databases were searched for randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies exploring the effects of exercise interventions on hamstring injury incidence. Subgroup analyses were performed to determine effects of several independent variables related to the interventions. Altogether, 17 studies were included. Exercise interventions decreased hamstring injury risk (RR = 0.49; 95%CI = 0.40–0.59; p < 0.001). There were similar effects found for interventions performed ≤2 times per week (RR = 0.35; 95%CI = 0.15–0.82) and the interventions performed >2 times per week (RR = 0.44; 95%CI = 0.31–0.61). Similarly, there were similar effects found for the interventions with progressive increase in load (RR = 0.53; 95%CI = 0.37–0.74) and the interventions with constant loads (RR = 0.46; 95%CI = 0.36–0.58). Other subgroup analyses (intervention supervision, sport type, inclusion of Nordic hamstring exercise and type of the trial) also showed no indications on specific characteristics of the interventions, that increase the preventive effects. Our findings showed that hamstring injury incidence can be decreased with exercise-based interventions, and that weekly frequency and load progression are not among the most important variables to consider in prevention programmes design.","PeriodicalId":12061,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Sport Science","volume":"1 1","pages":"992 - 1004"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Sport Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2019.1689300","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of exercise-based interventions for prevention of hamstring injuries in sport. PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, ResearchGate, CINAHL, PEDro, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar databases were searched for randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies exploring the effects of exercise interventions on hamstring injury incidence. Subgroup analyses were performed to determine effects of several independent variables related to the interventions. Altogether, 17 studies were included. Exercise interventions decreased hamstring injury risk (RR = 0.49; 95%CI = 0.40–0.59; p < 0.001). There were similar effects found for interventions performed ≤2 times per week (RR = 0.35; 95%CI = 0.15–0.82) and the interventions performed >2 times per week (RR = 0.44; 95%CI = 0.31–0.61). Similarly, there were similar effects found for the interventions with progressive increase in load (RR = 0.53; 95%CI = 0.37–0.74) and the interventions with constant loads (RR = 0.46; 95%CI = 0.36–0.58). Other subgroup analyses (intervention supervision, sport type, inclusion of Nordic hamstring exercise and type of the trial) also showed no indications on specific characteristics of the interventions, that increase the preventive effects. Our findings showed that hamstring injury incidence can be decreased with exercise-based interventions, and that weekly frequency and load progression are not among the most important variables to consider in prevention programmes design.
运动干预预防运动员腿筋损伤:系统回顾和荟萃分析
本荟萃分析的目的是评估以运动为基础的干预措施对预防运动中腘绳肌损伤的有效性。我们检索了PubMed、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、Web of Science、ResearchGate、CINAHL、PEDro、ScienceDirect和Google Scholar数据库,以寻找探索运动干预对腿筋损伤发生率影响的随机对照试验和前瞻性队列研究。进行亚组分析以确定与干预措施相关的几个独立变量的影响。总共纳入了17项研究。运动干预降低腘绳肌损伤风险(RR = 0.49;95%ci = 0.40-0.59;p 2次/周(RR = 0.44;95%ci = 0.31-0.61)。同样,负荷渐进式增加的干预也有类似的效果(RR = 0.53;95%CI = 0.37-0.74)和恒定负荷干预(RR = 0.46;95%ci = 0.36-0.58)。其他亚组分析(干预监督、运动类型、北欧腘绳肌运动和试验类型)也没有显示出干预措施的特定特征增加预防效果的迹象。我们的研究结果表明,以运动为基础的干预措施可以降低腿筋损伤的发生率,并且每周的频率和负荷进展并不是预防方案设计中要考虑的最重要的变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Sport Science
European Journal of Sport Science 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Sport Science (EJSS) is the official Medline- and Thomson Reuters-listed journal of the European College of Sport Science. The editorial policy of the Journal pursues the multi-disciplinary aims of the College: to promote the highest standards of scientific study and scholarship in respect of the following fields: (a) Applied Sport Sciences; (b) Biomechanics and Motor Control; c) Physiology and Nutrition; (d) Psychology, Social Sciences and Humanities and (e) Sports and Exercise Medicine and Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信