A Comparison of Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine versus Ketamine-Propofolfor Sedation in Children during Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

M. Mogahed, E. Salama
{"title":"A Comparison of Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine versus Ketamine-Propofolfor Sedation in Children during Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","authors":"M. Mogahed, E. Salama","doi":"10.4172/2155-6148.1000785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in pediatric patients have increased and become more frequent. Selection of a sedative with hemodynamic stability, rapid onset, short action and few side effects is essential. \n Material and methods: 60 ASAI/II patients between the age of 2-12 yrs of both sexes undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy randomly allocated into two groups, 30 patients each, all patients received ketamine 1 mg/kg intravenous, then group KD received dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg bolus dose slowly IV and patients in Group KP received propofol 1 mg/kg as initial doses then top-up doses of 2-4 ml of the prepared solutions were given till RSS of ≥ 5. Hemodynamic parameters, total ketamine dose, time to RSS ≥ 5 and PADSS of 9-10, side effects and Parents’ and Endoscopists’ satisfaction were recorded. Results: HR was significantly lower in group KD at T1, T2 and T3, no significant difference as regard MAP, RR, SpO2 and time to achieve RSS and PADSS (p>0.05), significantly higher total ketamine dose in group KD than group KP (P=0.001), Parents’ and Endoscopists’ satisfaction was significantly higher in group KD than KP (p<0.05). Conclusion: Ketamine-dexmedetomidine for sedation in children during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is an effective, reliable and safe alternative to ketamine-propofol without hemodynamic or respiratory drawbacks with comparable onset and recovery time.","PeriodicalId":15000,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","volume":"64 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anesthesia and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6148.1000785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Background: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in pediatric patients have increased and become more frequent. Selection of a sedative with hemodynamic stability, rapid onset, short action and few side effects is essential. Material and methods: 60 ASAI/II patients between the age of 2-12 yrs of both sexes undergoing upper gastrointestinal endoscopy randomly allocated into two groups, 30 patients each, all patients received ketamine 1 mg/kg intravenous, then group KD received dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg bolus dose slowly IV and patients in Group KP received propofol 1 mg/kg as initial doses then top-up doses of 2-4 ml of the prepared solutions were given till RSS of ≥ 5. Hemodynamic parameters, total ketamine dose, time to RSS ≥ 5 and PADSS of 9-10, side effects and Parents’ and Endoscopists’ satisfaction were recorded. Results: HR was significantly lower in group KD at T1, T2 and T3, no significant difference as regard MAP, RR, SpO2 and time to achieve RSS and PADSS (p>0.05), significantly higher total ketamine dose in group KD than group KP (P=0.001), Parents’ and Endoscopists’ satisfaction was significantly higher in group KD than KP (p<0.05). Conclusion: Ketamine-dexmedetomidine for sedation in children during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is an effective, reliable and safe alternative to ketamine-propofol without hemodynamic or respiratory drawbacks with comparable onset and recovery time.
氯胺酮-右美托咪定与氯胺酮-异丙酚在儿童上消化道内镜下镇静作用的比较
背景:上消化道内镜在儿科患者中的应用越来越多且越来越频繁。选择血流动力学稳定、起效快、起效短、副作用少的镇静剂至关重要。材料与方法:60例年龄2-12岁的ASAI/II患者,男女均行上消化道内镜检查,随机分为两组,每组30例,所有患者均给予氯胺酮1 mg/kg静脉滴注,KD组给予右美托咪定1 μg/kg单次缓慢静脉滴注,KP组给予异丙酚1 mg/kg初始剂量,再将配制好的溶液补加2-4 ml,直至RSS≥5。记录血流动力学参数、氯胺酮总剂量、达到RSS≥5和PADSS为9-10的时间、不良反应以及家长和内镜医师的满意度。结果:KD组T1、T2、T3时HR显著低于KP组,MAP、RR、SpO2及达到RSS、PADSS时间差异无统计学意义(p>0.05), KD组氯胺酮总剂量显著高于KP组(p =0.001), KD组家长满意度和内镜医师满意度显著高于KP组(p<0.05)。结论:氯胺酮-右美托咪定用于儿童上消化道内镜下镇静是氯胺酮-异丙酚有效、可靠、安全的替代品,无血流动力学和呼吸缺陷,起效和恢复时间相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信