{"title":"Shear bond strength of composite to demineralized enamel conditioned with resin infiltration","authors":"Sebahat Melike Durukan, Burak Gümüştaş, Soner Şişmanoğlu","doi":"10.5577/intdentres.441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of resin infiltration on bond-strength of composite resin to demineralized enamel.\nMethodology: Thirty bovine incisors were used in this study. Buccal enamel surfaces of bovine incisors were wet polished and then were divided into three groups: sound enamel; demineralized enamel; demineralized enamel infiltrated with a low-viscosity resin (ICON, DMG, Hamburg, Germany). After acid-etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 20 seconds, a two-step, total-etch adhesive (Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) was applied using a microbrush for 20 seconds, followed by gentle air-drying for 5 seconds. The adhesive was light-cured for 10 seconds. Following the adhesive application, flowable composite resin (Filtek Supreme Flowable, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) was gently placed into a microtubule and was photopolymerized using an LED curing unit (Elipar Deep Cure; 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA). The microshear bond strength (µSBS) tests were performed using a microshear testing machine at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min. One-way ANOVA and Bonferroni tests were used to analyze the data (5%).\nResults: Significant differences were found according to the ANOVA (p < 0.05). Pair-wise comparison results of µSBS (mean ± SD) were: sound enamel (25.16 ± 2.3); demineralized enamel (17.93 ± 2.1); demineralized enamel infiltrated with a low-viscosity resin (28.51 ± 3.76).\nConclusion: Resin infiltration applied to demineralized enamel before composite application increased the bond strength. No difference was found in the bond strength values obtained for sound enamel and resin infiltrated enamel.\n \nHow to cite this article: \nDurukan SM, Gümüştaş B, Şişmanoğlu S. Shear bond strength of composite to demineralized enamel conditioned with resin infiltration. Int Dent Res 2022;12(Suppl.1):114-19. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.441\n \nLinguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.","PeriodicalId":31322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Clinical Dental Research Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of resin infiltration on bond-strength of composite resin to demineralized enamel.
Methodology: Thirty bovine incisors were used in this study. Buccal enamel surfaces of bovine incisors were wet polished and then were divided into three groups: sound enamel; demineralized enamel; demineralized enamel infiltrated with a low-viscosity resin (ICON, DMG, Hamburg, Germany). After acid-etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 20 seconds, a two-step, total-etch adhesive (Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) was applied using a microbrush for 20 seconds, followed by gentle air-drying for 5 seconds. The adhesive was light-cured for 10 seconds. Following the adhesive application, flowable composite resin (Filtek Supreme Flowable, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) was gently placed into a microtubule and was photopolymerized using an LED curing unit (Elipar Deep Cure; 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA). The microshear bond strength (µSBS) tests were performed using a microshear testing machine at a cross-head speed of 0.5 mm/min. One-way ANOVA and Bonferroni tests were used to analyze the data (5%).
Results: Significant differences were found according to the ANOVA (p < 0.05). Pair-wise comparison results of µSBS (mean ± SD) were: sound enamel (25.16 ± 2.3); demineralized enamel (17.93 ± 2.1); demineralized enamel infiltrated with a low-viscosity resin (28.51 ± 3.76).
Conclusion: Resin infiltration applied to demineralized enamel before composite application increased the bond strength. No difference was found in the bond strength values obtained for sound enamel and resin infiltrated enamel.
How to cite this article:
Durukan SM, Gümüştaş B, Şişmanoğlu S. Shear bond strength of composite to demineralized enamel conditioned with resin infiltration. Int Dent Res 2022;12(Suppl.1):114-19. https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.441
Linguistic Revision: The English in this manuscript has been checked by at least two professional editors, both native speakers of English.
目的:研究树脂浸润对复合树脂与脱矿牙釉质结合强度的影响。方法:本研究采用30只牛门牙。对牛切牙颊面牙釉质进行湿抛光,分为三组:音牙釉质;软化搪瓷;用低粘度树脂浸渍脱矿牙釉质(ICON, DMG, Hamburg, Germany)。用37%磷酸酸蚀刻20秒后,用微刷涂上两步全蚀刻粘合剂(Single Bond 2, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) 20秒,然后温和风干5秒。粘合剂光固化10秒。在粘合剂应用之后,可流动的复合树脂(Filtek Supreme flowable, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA)被轻轻放入微管中,并使用LED固化装置(Elipar Deep Cure;3M ESPE,圣保罗,明尼苏达州,美国)。微剪切粘接强度(µSBS)测试采用微剪切试验机,十字速度为0.5 mm/min。采用单因素方差分析和Bonferroni检验对数据进行分析(5%)。结果:方差分析差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。µSBS两两比较结果(mean±SD)为:声牙釉质(25.16±2.3);脱矿牙釉质(17.93±2.1);低粘度树脂浸润脱矿牙釉质(28.51±3.76)。结论:复合材料应用前树脂浸润可提高脱矿牙釉质的结合强度。完好牙釉质与树脂浸润牙釉质的结合强度值无差异。Durukan SM, g m taak B, Şişmanoğlu S.树脂渗透条件下复合材料与脱矿牙釉质的剪切结合强度。国际医学杂志,2022;12(增刊1):114-19。https://doi.org/10.5577/intdentres.441语言修改:本手稿中的英语已由至少两名专业编辑检查,他们都是英语母语者。