Effects of feeding high-moisture corn stover to gestating and lactating beef cows as an alternative to hay and corn silage on performance and reproduction

W.C. Meteer , L.M. Shoup , W.P. Chapple , W.T. Meteer PAS , D.W. Shike
{"title":"Effects of feeding high-moisture corn stover to gestating and lactating beef cows as an alternative to hay and corn silage on performance and reproduction","authors":"W.C. Meteer ,&nbsp;L.M. Shoup ,&nbsp;W.P. Chapple ,&nbsp;W.T. Meteer PAS ,&nbsp;D.W. Shike","doi":"10.15232/pas.2017-01675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>The objectives of this study were to evaluate ensiled high-moisture corn stover<span><span> as an alternative forage for beef cows<span>. In Exp. 1, multiparous, gestating Simmental and </span></span>Angus<span><span> × Simmental cows (n = 96) were limit fed 1 of 3 treatments: (1) 60% high-moisture corn stover, 25% ground cornstalks, and 15% corn gluten feed (HMCS); (2) 60% </span>corn silage<span>, 25% ground cornstalks, and 15% corn gluten feed (SIL); or (3) 60% hay, 25% ground cornstalks, and 15% corn gluten feed (HY) from 108 ± 14 to 38 ± 14 d prepartum. In Exp. 2, lactating Simmental and Simmental × Angus cows (n = 79) were limit fed 1 of 2 treatments at calving: (1) 75% high-moisture corn stover and 25% dried distillers grains (HMCS2) or (2) 70% corn silage and 30% dried distillers grains (SIL2). Diets were limit fed to achieve </span></span></span></span><span>NASEM (2016)</span> requirements for maintenance and lactation. In Exp. 1, BW gain was greater (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) for cows fed SIL than cows fed HY or HMCS. In Exp. 2, BW gain was greater (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) for cows fed SIL2 than cows fed HMCS2; however, no differences (<em>P</em> ≥ 0.17) were detected in milk production, subsequent AI conception, or overall pregnancy rates. The similar performance of gestating cows fed hay or high-moisture corn stover indicates high-moisture corn stover is a viable hay replacement. When fed to lactating cows, high-moisture corn stover could be fed as a replacement to corn silage with no effect on milk or reproduction. Overall, feeding high-moisture corn stover is a cost-saving strategy in both stages of production.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22841,"journal":{"name":"The Professional Animal Scientist","volume":"34 2","pages":"Pages 210-217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15232/pas.2017-01675","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Professional Animal Scientist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1080744618300342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to evaluate ensiled high-moisture corn stover as an alternative forage for beef cows. In Exp. 1, multiparous, gestating Simmental and Angus × Simmental cows (n = 96) were limit fed 1 of 3 treatments: (1) 60% high-moisture corn stover, 25% ground cornstalks, and 15% corn gluten feed (HMCS); (2) 60% corn silage, 25% ground cornstalks, and 15% corn gluten feed (SIL); or (3) 60% hay, 25% ground cornstalks, and 15% corn gluten feed (HY) from 108 ± 14 to 38 ± 14 d prepartum. In Exp. 2, lactating Simmental and Simmental × Angus cows (n = 79) were limit fed 1 of 2 treatments at calving: (1) 75% high-moisture corn stover and 25% dried distillers grains (HMCS2) or (2) 70% corn silage and 30% dried distillers grains (SIL2). Diets were limit fed to achieve NASEM (2016) requirements for maintenance and lactation. In Exp. 1, BW gain was greater (P < 0.01) for cows fed SIL than cows fed HY or HMCS. In Exp. 2, BW gain was greater (P < 0.01) for cows fed SIL2 than cows fed HMCS2; however, no differences (P ≥ 0.17) were detected in milk production, subsequent AI conception, or overall pregnancy rates. The similar performance of gestating cows fed hay or high-moisture corn stover indicates high-moisture corn stover is a viable hay replacement. When fed to lactating cows, high-moisture corn stover could be fed as a replacement to corn silage with no effect on milk or reproduction. Overall, feeding high-moisture corn stover is a cost-saving strategy in both stages of production.

饲喂高水分玉米秸秆替代干草和玉米青贮对妊娠期和哺乳期肉牛生产性能和繁殖的影响
本研究的目的是评价青贮高水分玉米秸秆作为肉牛饲料的替代选择。试验1:96头多产、妊娠期西门塔尔奶牛和安格斯×西门塔尔奶牛分别饲喂3种处理中的1种:(1)60%高湿玉米秸秆、25%玉米秸秆、15%玉米蛋白粉饲料(HMCS);(2) 60%玉米青贮,25%玉米秸秆,15%玉米蛋白粉饲料(SIL);(3)在108±14 ~ 38±14 d的准备阶段,60%干草,25%玉米秸秆,15%玉米蛋白饲料(HY)。在试验2中,泌乳期西门特和西门特×安格斯奶牛(n = 79)在产犊时限量饲喂2种处理中的1种:(1)75%高湿玉米秸秆加25%干酒糟(HMCS2)或(2)70%玉米青贮加30%干酒糟(SIL2)。限饲以达到NASEM(2016)的维持和哺乳要求。试验1中体重增加较大(P <饲喂SIL的奶牛比饲喂HY和HMCS的奶牛肥力高0.01)。试验2增重较大(P <饲喂SIL2的奶牛比饲喂HMCS2的奶牛表现出0.01);然而,在产奶量、随后的人工受孕或总妊娠率方面没有发现差异(P≥0.17)。饲喂干草和高水分玉米秸秆的妊娠奶牛生产性能相近,说明高水分玉米秸秆是一种可行的干草替代品。用高水分玉米秸秆代替玉米青贮饲喂泌乳奶牛,对泌乳和繁殖均无影响。总的来说,在生产的两个阶段,饲喂高水分玉米秸秆都是一种节省成本的策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信