{"title":"Sobre la relación entre el conocimiento y el pensamiento simbólico: algunos aportes fundamentales para las ciencias sociales","authors":"Juan Erick Carrera","doi":"10.4067/S0717-554X2019000200167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"espanolResumen: En el presente articulo se propone una forma particular de problematizar lo que podemos comprender como conocimiento en ciencias sociales, que marginado de una perspectiva naturalista y mas proximo a una fenomenologico-hermeneutica, vislumbra posibles intersecciones entre lo simbolico, lo social y lo cognitivo, con la finalidad de establecer desde una dimension compleja y dialectica un enfoque analitico de la ciencia social del conocimiento. Para ello, comenzaremos por figurar una problematizacion sobre el conocimiento en ciencias sociales, abordando algunas premisas sociologicas y las funciones sociocognitivas para conceptualizar una perspectiva compleja del conocimiento. Posteriormente, un segundo apartado se sustenta sobre tres ejes principales: la objetividad, la subjetividad y la imaginacion, como una triada trascendental en esta perspectiva epistemologica. Para finalizar con la busqueda de la relacion entre el conocimiento y un pensamiento simbolico de acuerdo con los argumentos expuestos en los apartados anteriores, donde se entiende que las estructuras imaginario-arquetipicas circundantes en la realidad social, el proceso de comprension e intersubjetividad constituyen, entre otros, los cimientos de los que vamos a entender por conocimiento en ciencias sociales. EnglishAbstract: This paper proposes a particular form of problematize what we can understand as knowledge in social sciences, that marginalized from a naturalistic perspective and closer to a phenomenological-hermeneutics glimpses possible intersections between the symbolic, the social and the cognitive, with the purpose of establishing from a complex and dialectical dimension an analytical approach of the social science of knowledge. To do this, we will begin by figuring out a problematization about knowledge in social sciences, addressing some sociological premises and socio-cognitive functions to conceptualize a complex perspective of knowledge. Subsequently, a second section is based on three main axes: objectivity, subjectivity and imagination, as a transcendental triad in this epistemological perspective. To end with the search for the relationship between knowledge and the symbolic thought according to the arguments outlined in the preceding paragraphs, where we understood that the imaginary-archetypal structures surrounding the social reality, the process of understanding and intersubjectivity constitute, among others, the foundations of which we will understand by knowledge in social sciences","PeriodicalId":54112,"journal":{"name":"Cinta de Moebio","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cinta de Moebio","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-554X2019000200167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
espanolResumen: En el presente articulo se propone una forma particular de problematizar lo que podemos comprender como conocimiento en ciencias sociales, que marginado de una perspectiva naturalista y mas proximo a una fenomenologico-hermeneutica, vislumbra posibles intersecciones entre lo simbolico, lo social y lo cognitivo, con la finalidad de establecer desde una dimension compleja y dialectica un enfoque analitico de la ciencia social del conocimiento. Para ello, comenzaremos por figurar una problematizacion sobre el conocimiento en ciencias sociales, abordando algunas premisas sociologicas y las funciones sociocognitivas para conceptualizar una perspectiva compleja del conocimiento. Posteriormente, un segundo apartado se sustenta sobre tres ejes principales: la objetividad, la subjetividad y la imaginacion, como una triada trascendental en esta perspectiva epistemologica. Para finalizar con la busqueda de la relacion entre el conocimiento y un pensamiento simbolico de acuerdo con los argumentos expuestos en los apartados anteriores, donde se entiende que las estructuras imaginario-arquetipicas circundantes en la realidad social, el proceso de comprension e intersubjetividad constituyen, entre otros, los cimientos de los que vamos a entender por conocimiento en ciencias sociales. EnglishAbstract: This paper proposes a particular form of problematize what we can understand as knowledge in social sciences, that marginalized from a naturalistic perspective and closer to a phenomenological-hermeneutics glimpses possible intersections between the symbolic, the social and the cognitive, with the purpose of establishing from a complex and dialectical dimension an analytical approach of the social science of knowledge. To do this, we will begin by figuring out a problematization about knowledge in social sciences, addressing some sociological premises and socio-cognitive functions to conceptualize a complex perspective of knowledge. Subsequently, a second section is based on three main axes: objectivity, subjectivity and imagination, as a transcendental triad in this epistemological perspective. To end with the search for the relationship between knowledge and the symbolic thought according to the arguments outlined in the preceding paragraphs, where we understood that the imaginary-archetypal structures surrounding the social reality, the process of understanding and intersubjectivity constitute, among others, the foundations of which we will understand by knowledge in social sciences
espanolResumen:本文章拟以某种特定纠缠我能理解作为知识社会学观点,边缘化的博物学家和更多的期待下一个fenomenologico-hermeneutica,之间的潜在路口的一个象征,它和社会认知,目的是建立从一个复杂的维度和方法dialectica analitico社会科学知识。本文的主要目的是探讨知识在社会科学中的作用,并探讨知识在社会科学中的作用。第二部分以三个主要轴为基础:客观性、主观性和想象,作为这一认识论视角中的先验三联。最后搜索与知识和思想之间的关系根据论点的一个象征,以前据了解,分段周边imaginario-arquetipicas结构在现实社会、理解和intersubjetividad构成进程除其他外,我们要理解为什么地基的社会科学知识。EnglishAbstract: This paper政见特定form of problematize what we can作为社会科学知识去理解that marginalized from naturalistic观点和贴近phenomenological-hermeneutics glimpses可能hernandez between the symbolic, the social and the cognitive, with the目的建立from a complex and徙dimension an analytical approach of the social science of knowledge。为此,我们将首先对社会科学中的知识进行质疑,解决一些社会学前提和社会认知功能,以概念化知识的复杂视角。随后,第二部分基于三个主要轴:客观性、主观性和想象,作为这一认识论视角中的先验三位一体。To end with the search for the relationship between knowledge and the symbolic thought To the论点outlined in the preceding分保,where we不言而喻,that the imaginary-archetypal聘用社会的the reality, the process of understanding and intersubjectivity的案中,菲律宾which we will基础社会科学去理解by knowledge in
期刊介绍:
Cinta de Moebio publishes scientific articles and essays on epistemology of social science. The editorial experience of the magazine indicates that some academics send articles of philosophy, but of issues that are not related to the social sciences, as well as academics who sent the results of their research or projects in the social sciences, but its focus is not epistemology, which also are geared out to the purpose of the journal. The journal, put it in some way, it is in the dialogue of philosophy with social science and, therefore, both domains must be present in the articles.