The Herbicide Glyphosate and Its Apparently Controversial Effect on Human Health: An Updated Clinical Perspective.

Carlo Caiati, Paolo Pollice, Stefano Favale, Mario Erminio Lepera
{"title":"The Herbicide Glyphosate and Its Apparently Controversial Effect on Human Health: An Updated Clinical Perspective.","authors":"Carlo Caiati, Paolo Pollice, Stefano Favale, Mario Erminio Lepera","doi":"10.2174/1871530319666191015191614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glyphosate (G) is the most common weed-killer in the world. Every year tons and tons of G are applied on crop fields. G was first introduced in the mid 1970s and since then its usage has gradually increased to reach a peak since 2005. Now G usage is approximately 100 -fold what it was in 1970. Its impact on human health was considered benign at the beginning. But over the years, evidence of a pervasive negative effect of this pesticide on humans has been mounting. Nonetheless, G usage is allowed by government health control agencies (both in the United States and Europe), that rely upon the evidence produced by the G producer. However, the IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) in 2015 has stated that G is probable carcinogenic (class 2A), the second highest class in terms of risk.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this review, we explore the effect of G on human health, focusing in particular on more recent knowledge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We have attempted to untangle the controversy about the dangers of the product for human beings in view of a very recent development, when the so -called Monsanto Papers, consisting of Emails and memos from Monsanto came to light, revealing a coordinated strategy to manipulate the debate about the safety of glyphosate to the company's advantage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The story of G is a recurrent one (see the tobacco story), that seriously jeopardizes the credibility of the scientific study in the modern era.</p>","PeriodicalId":30288,"journal":{"name":"Estudos do CEPE","volume":"1 1","pages":"489-505"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudos do CEPE","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1871530319666191015191614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background: Glyphosate (G) is the most common weed-killer in the world. Every year tons and tons of G are applied on crop fields. G was first introduced in the mid 1970s and since then its usage has gradually increased to reach a peak since 2005. Now G usage is approximately 100 -fold what it was in 1970. Its impact on human health was considered benign at the beginning. But over the years, evidence of a pervasive negative effect of this pesticide on humans has been mounting. Nonetheless, G usage is allowed by government health control agencies (both in the United States and Europe), that rely upon the evidence produced by the G producer. However, the IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) in 2015 has stated that G is probable carcinogenic (class 2A), the second highest class in terms of risk.

Objective: In this review, we explore the effect of G on human health, focusing in particular on more recent knowledge.

Results: We have attempted to untangle the controversy about the dangers of the product for human beings in view of a very recent development, when the so -called Monsanto Papers, consisting of Emails and memos from Monsanto came to light, revealing a coordinated strategy to manipulate the debate about the safety of glyphosate to the company's advantage.

Conclusion: The story of G is a recurrent one (see the tobacco story), that seriously jeopardizes the credibility of the scientific study in the modern era.

除草剂草甘膦及其对人体健康的明显争议性影响:最新临床观点。
背景:草甘膦(Glyphosate,G)是世界上最常见的除草剂。每年都有成吨成吨的草甘膦被施用在农田里。草甘膦于 20 世纪 70 年代中期首次问世,此后其用量逐渐增加,并于 2005 年达到顶峰。现在,禾草灵的用量大约是 1970 年的 100 倍。开始时,人们认为它对人类健康的影响是无害的。但随着时间的推移,越来越多的证据表明,这种杀虫剂对人类普遍存在负面影响。尽管如此,美国和欧洲的政府卫生控制机构仍允许使用 G,并以 G 生产商提供的证据为依据。然而,国际癌症研究机构(IARC)在 2015 年指出,γ 可能致癌(2A 级),是风险第二高的等级:在这篇综述中,我们探讨了 G 对人类健康的影响,尤其侧重于最新的知识:孟山都公司的电子邮件和备忘录组成的所谓 "孟山都文件 "曝光,揭示了孟山都公司采取协调策略,操纵有关草甘膦安全性的辩论,以达到对公司有利的目的:G 的故事一再发生(参见烟草的故事),严重危害了现代科学研究的可信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信