Reflections of the psychological impact of coronavirus in clinical practice: Emergency psychiatry during the COVID-19 pandemic

Y. Yıldırım
{"title":"Reflections of the psychological impact of coronavirus in clinical practice: Emergency psychiatry during the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Y. Yıldırım","doi":"10.14744/dajpns.2023.00208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The pandemic of coronavirus has caused various psychological impacts. Psychiatric emergency departments (PED) are important to detect the clinical reflections of this unforeseeable and extraordinary period, as these departments served uninterruptedly during the pandemic. We aim to study the possible reflections by comparing the medical data obtained during pandemic period with the same dates of the previous year. Method: A total of 7209 patients admitted to PED between March–May 2019 and March–May 2020 were included in this retrospective and cohort study. Comparisons were made between the two periods based on the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the patients. Results: PED visits, which were 4330 in 2019, decreased by 33.5% to 2879 in 2020. The number of female patients decreased be-tween 2019 and 2020 (p=0.001), but there was no difference in terms of age (p=0.085). It was observed that all diagnosis groups decreased in 2020, except for “Neurocognitive Disorders.” The decrease in the frequency was most evident in “Obsessive-Compul-sive and Related Disorders” group (66.1%). On the other hand, the least decrease was found in “Anxiety Disorders” group (11.8%). Conclusion: Despite the fact that this pandemic is considered as a multifaceted psychological stressor, emergency psychiatry applications have decreased compared to the previous year during the pandemic. As the physical burden of the COVID-19 gradually diminishes, we may face a mental health pandemic due to tremendous psychological effects of this time period. It is obvious that some new and alternative ways to spread psychiatric practices are needed in the pandemic period and beyond.","PeriodicalId":11480,"journal":{"name":"Dusunen Adam: The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dusunen Adam: The Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/dajpns.2023.00208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The pandemic of coronavirus has caused various psychological impacts. Psychiatric emergency departments (PED) are important to detect the clinical reflections of this unforeseeable and extraordinary period, as these departments served uninterruptedly during the pandemic. We aim to study the possible reflections by comparing the medical data obtained during pandemic period with the same dates of the previous year. Method: A total of 7209 patients admitted to PED between March–May 2019 and March–May 2020 were included in this retrospective and cohort study. Comparisons were made between the two periods based on the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the patients. Results: PED visits, which were 4330 in 2019, decreased by 33.5% to 2879 in 2020. The number of female patients decreased be-tween 2019 and 2020 (p=0.001), but there was no difference in terms of age (p=0.085). It was observed that all diagnosis groups decreased in 2020, except for “Neurocognitive Disorders.” The decrease in the frequency was most evident in “Obsessive-Compul-sive and Related Disorders” group (66.1%). On the other hand, the least decrease was found in “Anxiety Disorders” group (11.8%). Conclusion: Despite the fact that this pandemic is considered as a multifaceted psychological stressor, emergency psychiatry applications have decreased compared to the previous year during the pandemic. As the physical burden of the COVID-19 gradually diminishes, we may face a mental health pandemic due to tremendous psychological effects of this time period. It is obvious that some new and alternative ways to spread psychiatric practices are needed in the pandemic period and beyond.
临床实践中冠状病毒对心理影响的反思:COVID-19大流行期间的急诊精神病学
目的:新型冠状病毒大流行造成了多方面的心理影响。精神科急诊科(PED)对于发现这一不可预见和特殊时期的临床反应非常重要,因为这些科在大流行期间不间断地提供服务。我们的目的是通过将大流行期间获得的医疗数据与前一年的同一日期进行比较,研究可能的反映。方法:在2019年3月至5月至2020年3月至5月期间,共有7209例PED患者被纳入这项回顾性和队列研究。根据患者的社会人口学和临床特征对两个时期进行比较。结果:PED就诊次数从2019年的4330次下降到2020年的2879次,下降了33.5%。2019年至2020年,女性患者数量减少(p=0.001),但年龄没有差异(p=0.085)。据观察,除“神经认知障碍”外,所有诊断组在2020年都有所下降。以“强迫及相关障碍”组下降最为明显(66.1%)。另一方面,“焦虑障碍”组下降最少(11.8%)。结论:尽管这次大流行被认为是一个多方面的心理压力源,但与前一年大流行期间相比,急诊精神病学应用有所减少。随着COVID-19的身体负担逐渐减轻,由于这一时期的巨大心理影响,我们可能面临精神健康大流行。显然,在大流行期间和以后,需要一些新的和替代的方法来传播精神病学实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信