Repercusión de la maniobra lift de vejiga sobre el punto gatillo miofascial del músculo tibial anterior y de la apófisis espinosa de lumbar 5

Carolina Marchuk, Laura Legal Do, PhD
{"title":"Repercusión de la maniobra lift de vejiga sobre el punto gatillo miofascial del músculo tibial anterior y de la apófisis espinosa de lumbar 5","authors":"Carolina Marchuk,&nbsp;Laura Legal Do, PhD","doi":"10.1016/S1886-9297(10)70010-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To provide an objective assessment of the immediate effect of bladder lift manipulation on the pain threshold of the tibialis anterior <em>trigger</em> point (TATP) and fifth lumbar spinous process (5LSP).</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>An experimental, controlled, simple randomized, single-blind study was conducted on a sample of 86 patients (two groups of 43 patients), male (44) and female (42), aged 20 to 60. The criteria for patient inclusion was the presence of a painful area located in a palpable taut band in the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle with ankle instability and pain in the 5LSP. Subjects in the experimental group (EG) were treated with a bladder lift maneuver, while patients in the control group (CG) were treated by pumping manipulation of the right thumb trapeziometacarpal joint (TMJ). Pain thresholds in the TATP and 5LSP were measured in both groups, both before and after manipulation.</p><p>The measurement recorded for both groups were subjected to statistical analysis with SPPS 17.0, performing Kolmogorov Smirnov test, Student <em>t</em> Test and correlation study (Pearson r correlation coefficient).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results of statistical analysis showed that pain threshold was significantly reduced in the EG (<em>P</em>&lt;.05) with respect to the CG, as determined by pre- and post- intervention measurements on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). No significant changes in pain threshold (<em>P</em>&gt;.05) were found. A Digital Pressure Algometry (DPA), performed both in the EG and the CG, showed a significant change in pain threshold (<em>P</em>&lt;.05), with a negative value for the CG. Statistics “p” values were similar for the TATP and 5LSP. A correlation study (Pearson r correlation coefficient) confirmed the results obtained.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of the statistical analysis confirmed our hypothesis: bladder lift manipulation causes pain threshold changes in the TATP and 5LSP immediately after the maneuver.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100997,"journal":{"name":"Osteopatía Científica","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 56-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1886-9297(10)70010-2","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteopatía Científica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1886929710700102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To provide an objective assessment of the immediate effect of bladder lift manipulation on the pain threshold of the tibialis anterior trigger point (TATP) and fifth lumbar spinous process (5LSP).

Material and methods

An experimental, controlled, simple randomized, single-blind study was conducted on a sample of 86 patients (two groups of 43 patients), male (44) and female (42), aged 20 to 60. The criteria for patient inclusion was the presence of a painful area located in a palpable taut band in the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle with ankle instability and pain in the 5LSP. Subjects in the experimental group (EG) were treated with a bladder lift maneuver, while patients in the control group (CG) were treated by pumping manipulation of the right thumb trapeziometacarpal joint (TMJ). Pain thresholds in the TATP and 5LSP were measured in both groups, both before and after manipulation.

The measurement recorded for both groups were subjected to statistical analysis with SPPS 17.0, performing Kolmogorov Smirnov test, Student t Test and correlation study (Pearson r correlation coefficient).

Results

The results of statistical analysis showed that pain threshold was significantly reduced in the EG (P<.05) with respect to the CG, as determined by pre- and post- intervention measurements on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). No significant changes in pain threshold (P>.05) were found. A Digital Pressure Algometry (DPA), performed both in the EG and the CG, showed a significant change in pain threshold (P<.05), with a negative value for the CG. Statistics “p” values were similar for the TATP and 5LSP. A correlation study (Pearson r correlation coefficient) confirmed the results obtained.

Conclusions

The results of the statistical analysis confirmed our hypothesis: bladder lift manipulation causes pain threshold changes in the TATP and 5LSP immediately after the maneuver.

膀胱提升操作对胫骨前肌肌筋膜触发点和腰椎棘突的影响5
目的客观评价提膀胱手法对胫骨前肌触发点(TATP)和第五腰椎棘突(5LSP)痛阈的即时影响。材料与方法对年龄在20 ~ 60岁的86例患者(两组43例)进行对照、简单随机、单盲实验研究,其中男44例,女42例。患者纳入的标准是在胫骨前肌(TA)可触及的紧绷带中存在疼痛区域,伴有踝关节不稳定和5LSP疼痛。实验组(EG)采用提膀胱手法治疗,对照组(CG)采用抽吸手法治疗右拇指斜跖关节(TMJ)。两组在操作前后分别测量ttp和5LSP的疼痛阈值。两组测量记录采用SPPS 17.0进行统计学分析,进行Kolmogorov Smirnov检验、Student t检验和相关性研究(Pearson r相关系数)。结果通过干预前和干预后的视觉模拟量表(Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)测量,统计分析结果显示,与CG相比,EG的痛阈值显著降低(P< 0.05)。疼痛阈值无明显变化(P> 0.05)。在EG和CG中进行的数字压力测量(DPA)显示疼痛阈值有显着变化(P< 0.05), CG为负值。ttp和5LSP的统计值“p”相似。相关研究(Pearson相关系数)证实了所得结果。结论统计分析的结果证实了我们的假设:举膀胱手法在操作后即刻引起TATP和5LSP疼痛阈值的改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信