Psychometric properties of the Harmony in Life Scale in South African and Ghanaian samples.

African Journal of Psychological Assessment Pub Date : 2023-02-28 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4102/ajopa.v5i0.122
Amanda Cromhout, Lusilda Schutte, Marié P Wissing, Angelina Wilson Fadiji, Tharina Guse, Sonia Mbowa
{"title":"Psychometric properties of the Harmony in Life Scale in South African and Ghanaian samples.","authors":"Amanda Cromhout, Lusilda Schutte, Marié P Wissing, Angelina Wilson Fadiji, Tharina Guse, Sonia Mbowa","doi":"10.4102/ajopa.v5i0.122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Harmony is regarded as important for well-being in many cultures. However, (cultural) differences in the meanings and manifestations of harmony may impact the equivalence of measures of harmony in life, as well as the associations between harmony and other well-being constructs. This study aimed to investigate the factorial, convergent and divergent validity, and measurement invariance of the Harmony in Life Scale (HILS) in South African and Ghanaian samples. Confirmatory factor analysis was applied to data from three South African samples (two multicultural samples completed the HILS in English; and a Setswana-speaking sample completed the HILS in Setswana) and one Ghanaian sample (completed the HILS in English). Sample sizes ranged between <i>n</i> = 400 and <i>n</i> = 427. Good fit indices were obtained for all samples, except for the Setswana-speaking sample from South Africa. In all instances the HILS showed good internal consistency reliability and convergent and divergent validity. Full scalar invariance was supported for the two multicultural South African samples, but only partial scalar invariance when data from the Ghanaian sample were added to the analysis. The HILS shows potential for future use in all samples, except the Setswana-speaking sample. Findings emphasise the importance of considering cultural and/or contextual and linguistic differences and how these may influence the measurement of psychological constructs. Future research should qualitatively explore the meanings and manifestations of harmony in various African and other global contexts in local languages.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>This study is the first to investigate the psychometric properties of the original English version of the HILS in South African and Ghanaian samples, as well as a Setswana translation of the scale. The study contributes to the understanding of harmony in life and the measurement thereof in diverse contexts, in this case specifically focused on African samples, and may, in turn, inform interventions and evaluation of interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":34043,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Psychological Assessment","volume":"108 5 1","pages":"122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12082207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/ajopa.v5i0.122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Harmony is regarded as important for well-being in many cultures. However, (cultural) differences in the meanings and manifestations of harmony may impact the equivalence of measures of harmony in life, as well as the associations between harmony and other well-being constructs. This study aimed to investigate the factorial, convergent and divergent validity, and measurement invariance of the Harmony in Life Scale (HILS) in South African and Ghanaian samples. Confirmatory factor analysis was applied to data from three South African samples (two multicultural samples completed the HILS in English; and a Setswana-speaking sample completed the HILS in Setswana) and one Ghanaian sample (completed the HILS in English). Sample sizes ranged between n = 400 and n = 427. Good fit indices were obtained for all samples, except for the Setswana-speaking sample from South Africa. In all instances the HILS showed good internal consistency reliability and convergent and divergent validity. Full scalar invariance was supported for the two multicultural South African samples, but only partial scalar invariance when data from the Ghanaian sample were added to the analysis. The HILS shows potential for future use in all samples, except the Setswana-speaking sample. Findings emphasise the importance of considering cultural and/or contextual and linguistic differences and how these may influence the measurement of psychological constructs. Future research should qualitatively explore the meanings and manifestations of harmony in various African and other global contexts in local languages.

Contribution: This study is the first to investigate the psychometric properties of the original English version of the HILS in South African and Ghanaian samples, as well as a Setswana translation of the scale. The study contributes to the understanding of harmony in life and the measurement thereof in diverse contexts, in this case specifically focused on African samples, and may, in turn, inform interventions and evaluation of interventions.

生活和谐量表在南非和加纳样本中的心理测量特征。
在许多文化中,和谐被认为是幸福的重要因素。然而,和谐的意义和表现形式的(文化)差异可能会影响生活中和谐衡量标准的等效性,以及和谐与其他幸福结构之间的联系。本研究旨在探讨和谐生活量表(HILS)在南非和加纳样本中的析因效度、收敛效度和发散效度以及测量不变性。验证性因子分析应用于三个南非样本的数据(两个多元文化样本用英语完成HILS;一个说塞茨瓦纳语的样本用塞茨瓦纳语完成HILS),一个说加纳语的样本(用英语完成HILS)。样本量在n = 400到n = 427之间。除了来自南非的赛特瓦纳语样本外,所有样本的拟合指数都很好。结果表明,HILS具有良好的内部一致性、信度、收敛度和发散度。对于两个多元文化的南非样本,支持完全标量不变性,但当将来自加纳样本的数据添加到分析中时,仅支持部分标量不变性。HILS显示出未来在所有样本中使用的潜力,除了说setswana语的样本。研究结果强调了考虑文化和/或语境和语言差异的重要性,以及这些差异如何影响心理构式的测量。未来的研究应定性地探讨“和谐”一词在非洲和其他全球语境中的意义和表现形式。贡献:本研究首次调查了南非和加纳样本中原始英语版HILS的心理测量特性,以及量表的茨瓦纳语翻译。这项研究有助于理解生活中的和谐及其在不同背景下的衡量,在这种情况下,特别关注非洲样本,并可能反过来为干预措施和干预措施的评估提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书