Potential Adverse Outcomes of Shared Decision Making about Palliative Cancer Treatment: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Medical Decision Making Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-12 DOI:10.1177/0272989X231208448
Loïs F van de Water, Danique W Bos-van den Hoek, Steven C Kuijper, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, Geert-Jan Creemers, Serge E Dohmen, Helle-Brit Fiebrich, Petronella B Ottevanger, Dirkje W Sommeijer, Filip Y F de Vos, Ellen M A Smets, Inge Henselmans
{"title":"Potential Adverse Outcomes of Shared Decision Making about Palliative Cancer Treatment: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial.","authors":"Loïs F van de Water, Danique W Bos-van den Hoek, Steven C Kuijper, Hanneke W M van Laarhoven, Geert-Jan Creemers, Serge E Dohmen, Helle-Brit Fiebrich, Petronella B Ottevanger, Dirkje W Sommeijer, Filip Y F de Vos, Ellen M A Smets, Inge Henselmans","doi":"10.1177/0272989X231208448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While shared decision making (SDM) is advocated for ethical reasons and beneficial outcomes, SDM might also negatively affect patients with incurable cancer. The current study explored whether SDM, and an oncologist training in SDM, are associated with adverse outcomes (i.e., patient anxiety, tension, helplessness/hopelessness, decisional uncertainty, and reduced fighting spirit).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial investigating the effects of SDM interventions in the context of advanced cancer. The relations between observed SDM (OPTION12), specific SDM elements (4SDM), oncologist SDM training, and adverse outcomes were analyzed. We modeled adverse outcomes as a multivariate phenomenon, followed by univariate regressions if significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 194 patients consulted by 31 oncologists were included. In a multivariate analysis, observed SDM and adverse outcomes were significantly related. More specifically, more observed SDM in the consultation was related to patients reporting more tension (<i>P</i> = 0.002) and more decisional uncertainty (<i>P</i> = 0.004) at 1 wk after the consultation. The SDM element \"informing about the options\" was especially found to be related to adverse outcomes, specifically to more helplessness/hopelessness (<i>P</i> = 0.002) and more tension (<i>P</i> = 0.016) at 1 wk after the consultation. Whether the patient consulted an oncologist who had received SDM training or not was not significantly related to adverse outcomes. No relations with long-term adverse outcomes were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is important for oncologists to realize that for some patients, SDM may temporarily be associated with negative emotions. Further research is needed to untangle which, when, and how adverse outcomes might occur and whether and how burden may be minimized for patients.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>Observed shared decision making was related to more tension and uncertainty postconsultation in advanced cancer patientsHowever, training oncologists in SDM did not affect adverse outcomes.Further research is needed to untangle which, when, and how adverse outcomes might occur and how burden may be minimized.</p>","PeriodicalId":49839,"journal":{"name":"Medical Decision Making","volume":" ","pages":"89-101"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10712204/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X231208448","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While shared decision making (SDM) is advocated for ethical reasons and beneficial outcomes, SDM might also negatively affect patients with incurable cancer. The current study explored whether SDM, and an oncologist training in SDM, are associated with adverse outcomes (i.e., patient anxiety, tension, helplessness/hopelessness, decisional uncertainty, and reduced fighting spirit).

Design: A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial investigating the effects of SDM interventions in the context of advanced cancer. The relations between observed SDM (OPTION12), specific SDM elements (4SDM), oncologist SDM training, and adverse outcomes were analyzed. We modeled adverse outcomes as a multivariate phenomenon, followed by univariate regressions if significant.

Results: In total, 194 patients consulted by 31 oncologists were included. In a multivariate analysis, observed SDM and adverse outcomes were significantly related. More specifically, more observed SDM in the consultation was related to patients reporting more tension (P = 0.002) and more decisional uncertainty (P = 0.004) at 1 wk after the consultation. The SDM element "informing about the options" was especially found to be related to adverse outcomes, specifically to more helplessness/hopelessness (P = 0.002) and more tension (P = 0.016) at 1 wk after the consultation. Whether the patient consulted an oncologist who had received SDM training or not was not significantly related to adverse outcomes. No relations with long-term adverse outcomes were found.

Conclusions: It is important for oncologists to realize that for some patients, SDM may temporarily be associated with negative emotions. Further research is needed to untangle which, when, and how adverse outcomes might occur and whether and how burden may be minimized for patients.

Highlights: Observed shared decision making was related to more tension and uncertainty postconsultation in advanced cancer patientsHowever, training oncologists in SDM did not affect adverse outcomes.Further research is needed to untangle which, when, and how adverse outcomes might occur and how burden may be minimized.

关于姑息性癌症治疗的共同决策的潜在不良后果:一项随机试验的二次分析。
背景:虽然出于伦理原因和有益的结果,共同决策(SDM)被提倡,但SDM也可能对无法治愈的癌症患者产生负面影响。本研究探讨SDM和接受SDM培训的肿瘤学家是否与不良结果(即患者焦虑、紧张、无助/绝望、决策不确定性和斗志下降)有关。设计:对一项随机临床试验进行二次分析,研究SDM干预对晚期癌症的影响。分析观察到的SDM (OPTION12)、特定SDM元素(4SDM)、肿瘤学家SDM培训与不良结局之间的关系。我们将不良结果建模为多变量现象,如果显著,则进行单变量回归。结果:共纳入31位肿瘤学家咨询的194例患者。在多变量分析中,观察到的SDM与不良结局显著相关。更具体地说,在会诊中观察到更多的SDM与患者在会诊后1周报告更多的紧张(P = 0.002)和更多的决策不确定性(P = 0.004)有关。SDM元素“告知选择”被特别发现与不良结果有关,特别是在咨询后1周,更多的无助/绝望(P = 0.002)和更多的紧张(P = 0.016)。患者是否咨询了接受过SDM培训的肿瘤学家与不良结果无显著相关。没有发现与长期不良结果的关系。结论:肿瘤学家必须认识到,对于一些患者来说,SDM可能暂时与负面情绪相关。需要进一步的研究来弄清哪些、何时以及如何发生不良后果,以及是否以及如何将患者的负担降至最低。重点:观察到的共同决策与晚期癌症患者会诊后更多的紧张和不确定性有关。然而,对肿瘤学家进行SDM培训并没有影响不良结果。需要进一步的研究来弄清哪些、何时以及如何发生不良后果,以及如何将负担降至最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Decision Making
Medical Decision Making 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Decision Making offers rigorous and systematic approaches to decision making that are designed to improve the health and clinical care of individuals and to assist with health care policy development. Using the fundamentals of decision analysis and theory, economic evaluation, and evidence based quality assessment, Medical Decision Making presents both theoretical and practical statistical and modeling techniques and methods from a variety of disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信