Look before you reach: Fixation-reach latencies predict reaching kinematics in toddlers

IF 2 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Infancy Pub Date : 2023-11-11 DOI:10.1111/infa.12567
Drew H. Abney, Christian M. Jerry, Linda B. Smith, Chen Yu
{"title":"Look before you reach: Fixation-reach latencies predict reaching kinematics in toddlers","authors":"Drew H. Abney,&nbsp;Christian M. Jerry,&nbsp;Linda B. Smith,&nbsp;Chen Yu","doi":"10.1111/infa.12567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Research on infant and toddler reaching has shown evidence for motor planning after the initiation of the reaching action. However, the reach action sequence does not begin after the initiation of a reach but rather includes the initial visual fixations onto the target object occurring before the reach. We developed a paradigm that synchronizes head-mounted eye-tracking and motion capture to determine whether the latency between the first visual fixation on a target object and the first reaching movement toward the object predicts subsequent reaching behavior in toddlers. In a corpus of over one hundred reach sequences produced by 17 toddlers, we found that longer fixation-reach latencies during the pre-reach phase predicted slower reaches. If the slowness of an executed reach indicates reach difficulty, then the duration of pre-reach planning would be correlated with reach difficulty. However, no relation was found with pre-reach planning duration when reach difficulty was measured by usual factors and independent of reach duration. The findings raise important questions about the measurement of reach difficulty, models of motor control, and possible developmental changes in the relations between pre-planning and continuously unfolding motor plans throughout an action sequence.</p>","PeriodicalId":47895,"journal":{"name":"Infancy","volume":"29 1","pages":"6-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/infa.12567","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infancy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/infa.12567","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on infant and toddler reaching has shown evidence for motor planning after the initiation of the reaching action. However, the reach action sequence does not begin after the initiation of a reach but rather includes the initial visual fixations onto the target object occurring before the reach. We developed a paradigm that synchronizes head-mounted eye-tracking and motion capture to determine whether the latency between the first visual fixation on a target object and the first reaching movement toward the object predicts subsequent reaching behavior in toddlers. In a corpus of over one hundred reach sequences produced by 17 toddlers, we found that longer fixation-reach latencies during the pre-reach phase predicted slower reaches. If the slowness of an executed reach indicates reach difficulty, then the duration of pre-reach planning would be correlated with reach difficulty. However, no relation was found with pre-reach planning duration when reach difficulty was measured by usual factors and independent of reach duration. The findings raise important questions about the measurement of reach difficulty, models of motor control, and possible developmental changes in the relations between pre-planning and continuously unfolding motor plans throughout an action sequence.

Abstract Image

伸手前先看:注视-伸手潜伏期预测幼儿的伸手运动。
对婴幼儿伸手动作的研究显示了伸手动作开始后运动规划的证据。然而,到达动作序列不是在到达开始之后开始的,而是包括在到达之前发生的对目标物体的初始视觉注视。我们开发了一个同步头戴式眼球追踪和动作捕捉的范式,以确定第一次注视目标物体和第一次向目标物体移动之间的延迟是否预测了幼儿随后的伸手行为。在17名幼儿的100多个到达序列的语料库中,我们发现在到达前阶段较长的注视到达潜伏期预示着较慢的到达。如果执行到达的缓慢表示到达的难度,那么到达前计划的持续时间将与到达的难度相关。然而,当采用常规因素测量到达难度且与到达时间无关时,到达难度与到达前计划时间没有关系。这一发现提出了一些重要的问题,包括到达难度的测量、运动控制模型,以及在整个动作序列中,预先计划和不断展开的运动计划之间的关系可能发生的发展变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infancy
Infancy PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Infancy, the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies, emphasizes the highest quality original research on normal and aberrant infant development during the first two years. Both human and animal research are included. In addition to regular length research articles and brief reports (3000-word maximum), the journal includes solicited target articles along with a series of commentaries; debates, in which different theoretical positions are presented along with a series of commentaries; and thematic collections, a group of three to five reports or summaries of research on the same issue, conducted independently at different laboratories, with invited commentaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信