Teaching Chest Tube Insertion by Blended Learning: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Surgical Innovation Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-13 DOI:10.1177/15533506231211049
Junko Tokuno, Sofia Valanci-Aroesty, Hayaki Uchino, Gabriela Ghitulescu, Christian Sirois, Pepa Kaneva, Gerald M Fried, Tamara E Carver
{"title":"Teaching Chest Tube Insertion by Blended Learning: A Multi-Dimensional Analysis.","authors":"Junko Tokuno, Sofia Valanci-Aroesty, Hayaki Uchino, Gabriela Ghitulescu, Christian Sirois, Pepa Kaneva, Gerald M Fried, Tamara E Carver","doi":"10.1177/15533506231211049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emerging technologies are being incorporated in surgical education. The use of such technology should be supported by evidence that the technology neither distracts nor overloads the learner and is easy to use. To teach chest tube insertion, we developed an e-learning module, as part of a blended learning program delivered prior to in-person hands-on simulation. This pilot study was aimed to assess learning effectiveness of this blended learning, and cognitive load and the usability of e-learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The interactive e-learning module with multimedia content was created following learning design principles. In advance of the standard simulation, 13 first-year surgical residents were randomized into two groups: 7 received the e-learning module and online reading materials (e-learning group); 6 received only the online reading materials (controls). Knowledge was evaluated by pre-and post-tests; technical performance was assessed using a Global Rating Scale by blinded assessors. Cognitive load and usability were evaluated using rating scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The e-learning group showed significant improvement from baseline in knowledge (<i>P</i> = .047), while controls did not (<i>P</i> = .500). For technical skill, 100% of residents in the e-learning group reached a predetermined proficiency level vs 60% of controls (<i>P</i> = .06). The addition of e-learning was associated with lower extrinsic and greater germane cognitive load (<i>P</i> = .04, .03, respectively). Usability was evaluated highly by all participants in e-learning group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interactive e-learning added to hands-on simulation led to improved learning and desired cognitive load and usability. This approach should be evaluated in teaching of other procedural skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10773156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506231211049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emerging technologies are being incorporated in surgical education. The use of such technology should be supported by evidence that the technology neither distracts nor overloads the learner and is easy to use. To teach chest tube insertion, we developed an e-learning module, as part of a blended learning program delivered prior to in-person hands-on simulation. This pilot study was aimed to assess learning effectiveness of this blended learning, and cognitive load and the usability of e-learning.

Methods: The interactive e-learning module with multimedia content was created following learning design principles. In advance of the standard simulation, 13 first-year surgical residents were randomized into two groups: 7 received the e-learning module and online reading materials (e-learning group); 6 received only the online reading materials (controls). Knowledge was evaluated by pre-and post-tests; technical performance was assessed using a Global Rating Scale by blinded assessors. Cognitive load and usability were evaluated using rating scales.

Results: The e-learning group showed significant improvement from baseline in knowledge (P = .047), while controls did not (P = .500). For technical skill, 100% of residents in the e-learning group reached a predetermined proficiency level vs 60% of controls (P = .06). The addition of e-learning was associated with lower extrinsic and greater germane cognitive load (P = .04, .03, respectively). Usability was evaluated highly by all participants in e-learning group.

Conclusion: Interactive e-learning added to hands-on simulation led to improved learning and desired cognitive load and usability. This approach should be evaluated in teaching of other procedural skills.

运用混合式学习方法进行胸管插入教学:多维分析。
背景:新兴技术正在被纳入外科教育。这种技术的使用应该有证据支持,证明这种技术既不会分散学习者的注意力,也不会使学习者负担过重,而且易于使用。为了教授胸管插入,我们开发了一个电子学习模块,作为在亲自动手模拟之前交付的混合学习计划的一部分。本初步研究旨在评估这种混合学习的学习效果,以及电子学习的认知负荷和可用性。方法:遵循学习设计原则,构建具有多媒体内容的交互式电子学习模块。在标准模拟之前,13名一年级外科住院医师被随机分为两组:7人接受电子学习模块和在线阅读材料(电子学习组);6只收到在线阅读材料(对照组)。知识通过前后测试进行评估;技术性能由盲法评估者使用全球评级量表进行评估。认知负荷和可用性采用评分量表进行评估。结果:在线学习组在知识方面较基线有显著改善(P = 0.047),而对照组无显著改善(P = 0.500)。对于技术技能,电子学习组中100%的居民达到预定的熟练程度,而对照组为60% (P = .06)。增加电子学习与较低的外在认知负荷和较大的相关认知负荷相关(P分别= 0.04,0.03)。可用性得到了e-learning组所有参与者的高度评价。结论:在动手模拟中加入交互式电子学习可以改善学习效果,提高认知负荷和可用性。这种方法应在其他程序技能的教学中加以评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical Innovation
Surgical Innovation 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信