Evaluation of two contrasting cassava canopy structures on weed flora composition in a rainforest zone of Nigeria.

O. Ola, F. Ekhator, J. Opabode, O. Akinyemiju, O. O. Ogedengbe
{"title":"Evaluation of two contrasting cassava canopy structures on weed flora composition in a rainforest zone of Nigeria.","authors":"O. Ola, F. Ekhator, J. Opabode, O. Akinyemiju, O. O. Ogedengbe","doi":"10.7176/jnsr/12-12-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The impact of weed competition on crop growth is a universal concern to farmers. This study was conducted in 2010 at the Teaching and Research Farm, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife to evaluate the impact of cassava canopy on weed diversity and identify shade-tolerant weed species in response to varying canopy structure at Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching and Research Farm, Ile-Ife ecological zone. The treatments consist of hand-weeded, herbicidal treatment, and unweeded checks in the main plot. The sub-plots constituted the cassava cultivars (TMS 30572 and TME 1) laid out in a randomized complete block with a split-plot arrangement in three replications. Fifteen weed species survived under the shade of TMS 30572 where two families were monocots while four families were dicots. However, twenty weed species were recorded where TME 1 was cultivated of which two families were monocots while five families were dicots. TMS 30572 suppressed weeds by 20% when compared to TME 1. In conclusion, TME 30572 is recommended for cultivation in this agroecology to obtain a maximum benefit on cassava production. The study designed was a randomized complete block with a split-plot arrangement laid in three replications. The weed control treatments (hand-weeded, herbicidal treatment, and unweeded check) constituted the main plot while cassava cultivars (TMS 30572 and TME 1) were the sub-plots. The cassava cultivars planted at 1m × 1m have 12 rows per sub-plot with 288 plant density and 576 per plot which amounted to 5,184 per location. The weed floras collected were from the fallow vegetation before land preparation and during the study. Quadrat of 1 m × 1 m was randomly thrown before land preparation, two times at 5 m intervals along transects that were 5 m apart, given a total of 40 samples for each location. Weed species found within each quadrat were harvested and identified using Akobundu and Agyakwa, (1987). Weed density was determined by counting the harvested weed stands at monthly intervals.","PeriodicalId":16368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Sciences Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Sciences Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7176/jnsr/12-12-05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impact of weed competition on crop growth is a universal concern to farmers. This study was conducted in 2010 at the Teaching and Research Farm, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife to evaluate the impact of cassava canopy on weed diversity and identify shade-tolerant weed species in response to varying canopy structure at Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching and Research Farm, Ile-Ife ecological zone. The treatments consist of hand-weeded, herbicidal treatment, and unweeded checks in the main plot. The sub-plots constituted the cassava cultivars (TMS 30572 and TME 1) laid out in a randomized complete block with a split-plot arrangement in three replications. Fifteen weed species survived under the shade of TMS 30572 where two families were monocots while four families were dicots. However, twenty weed species were recorded where TME 1 was cultivated of which two families were monocots while five families were dicots. TMS 30572 suppressed weeds by 20% when compared to TME 1. In conclusion, TME 30572 is recommended for cultivation in this agroecology to obtain a maximum benefit on cassava production. The study designed was a randomized complete block with a split-plot arrangement laid in three replications. The weed control treatments (hand-weeded, herbicidal treatment, and unweeded check) constituted the main plot while cassava cultivars (TMS 30572 and TME 1) were the sub-plots. The cassava cultivars planted at 1m × 1m have 12 rows per sub-plot with 288 plant density and 576 per plot which amounted to 5,184 per location. The weed floras collected were from the fallow vegetation before land preparation and during the study. Quadrat of 1 m × 1 m was randomly thrown before land preparation, two times at 5 m intervals along transects that were 5 m apart, given a total of 40 samples for each location. Weed species found within each quadrat were harvested and identified using Akobundu and Agyakwa, (1987). Weed density was determined by counting the harvested weed stands at monthly intervals.
尼日利亚热带雨林两种不同木薯冠层结构对杂草区系组成的影响。
杂草竞争对作物生长的影响是农民普遍关心的问题。本研究于2010年在Ile-Ife Obafemi Awolowo大学教学与研究农场进行,旨在评估木薯冠层对杂草多样性的影响,并在Ile-Ife生态区Obafemi Awolowo大学教学与研究农场确定不同冠层结构下的耐阴杂草物种。处理方法包括手工除草、除草和主田除草。小块由木薯品种tms30572和tme1组成,以3个重复的分块方式随机排列。TMS 30572遮荫下共存活15种杂草,其中单子房2科,双子房4科。在栽培TME 1时,共发现20种杂草,其中单子叶2科,双子叶5科。与TME 1相比,TMS 30572抑制杂草20%。综上所述,TME 30572推荐用于该农业生态系统的种植,以获得最大的木薯生产效益。该研究设计为随机完全块,分为三个重复。杂草控制处理(手除草、除草和除草)为主区,木薯品种(TMS 30572和TME 1)为副区。以1m × 1m种植的木薯品种,每分畦12行,株密度288株,每畦576株,每位5184株。在整地前和研究期间收集的杂草区系来自休耕植被。在整地前随机投掷1 m × 1 m的样方,沿间隔5 m的样条每隔5 m投掷2次,每个地点共40个样本。利用Akobundu和Agyakwa(1987)收集和鉴定每个样方内发现的杂草种类。杂草密度是通过每月对收获的杂草进行计数来确定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信