{"title":"Idempotent ideals and unions of nets of Prüfer domains","authors":"J. T. Arnold, R. Gilmer","doi":"10.32917/HMJ/1206138965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, all rings considered are assumed to be commutative rings with an identity element. It is known that an integral domain D may contain an idempotent proper ideal A. But when this occurs, A is not finitely generated [21, p. 215], so that D is not Noetherian. Also, it is easy to show that for any positive integer k there exists a ring R which is not a domain and such that R contains an ideal A with the property that A^)A^) •-•^)A = A=. .. Whether an integral domain R with this property exists is a heretofore open question which we answer affirmatively in §2. Nakano in [16] has considered the problem of determining when an ideal of D is idempotent, where D is the integral closure of Z, the domain of ordinary integers, in an infinite algebraic number field. In fact, the paper [16] is one of a series of papers which Nakano has written concerning the ideal structure of D. In [18], Ohm has generalized and simplified many of Nakano's results from [16] and [17], showing that as far as the structure of the set of primary ideals of D is concerned, the assumption that D is the integral closure of Z in an algebraic number field is superfluous the essential requirement on D being that it is a Prύfer domain according to the following definition: The integral domain / is a Prϋfer domain if for each proper prime ideal P of /, JP is a valuation ring; equivalently, / is a Prϋfer domain if each nonzero finitely generated ideal of / is invertible [10, p. 554]. Following Ohm's example, we show in §3 that most of Nakano's results in [16] carry over to the case when D is the integral closure of a fixed Prϋfer domain Do in an algebraic extension of the quotient field of Do. If / is an integral domain with quotient field K, a domain /0 between / and K will be called an overrίng of /. In case /0 is a valuation ring, we call /o a valuation overring of /. We say that / is an almost Dedekind domain if for each maximal ideal M of /, JM is a rank one discrete valuation ring [5], in","PeriodicalId":17080,"journal":{"name":"Journal of science of the Hiroshima University Ser. A Mathematics, physics, chemistry","volume":"55 1","pages":"131-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1967-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of science of the Hiroshima University Ser. A Mathematics, physics, chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32917/HMJ/1206138965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
Abstract
In this paper, all rings considered are assumed to be commutative rings with an identity element. It is known that an integral domain D may contain an idempotent proper ideal A. But when this occurs, A is not finitely generated [21, p. 215], so that D is not Noetherian. Also, it is easy to show that for any positive integer k there exists a ring R which is not a domain and such that R contains an ideal A with the property that A^)A^) •-•^)A = A=. .. Whether an integral domain R with this property exists is a heretofore open question which we answer affirmatively in §2. Nakano in [16] has considered the problem of determining when an ideal of D is idempotent, where D is the integral closure of Z, the domain of ordinary integers, in an infinite algebraic number field. In fact, the paper [16] is one of a series of papers which Nakano has written concerning the ideal structure of D. In [18], Ohm has generalized and simplified many of Nakano's results from [16] and [17], showing that as far as the structure of the set of primary ideals of D is concerned, the assumption that D is the integral closure of Z in an algebraic number field is superfluous the essential requirement on D being that it is a Prύfer domain according to the following definition: The integral domain / is a Prϋfer domain if for each proper prime ideal P of /, JP is a valuation ring; equivalently, / is a Prϋfer domain if each nonzero finitely generated ideal of / is invertible [10, p. 554]. Following Ohm's example, we show in §3 that most of Nakano's results in [16] carry over to the case when D is the integral closure of a fixed Prϋfer domain Do in an algebraic extension of the quotient field of Do. If / is an integral domain with quotient field K, a domain /0 between / and K will be called an overrίng of /. In case /0 is a valuation ring, we call /o a valuation overring of /. We say that / is an almost Dedekind domain if for each maximal ideal M of /, JM is a rank one discrete valuation ring [5], in