Improving Learning in Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries

IF 2 4区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS
N. Angrist, E. Aurino, H. Patrinos, George Psacharopoulos, Emiliana Vegas, R. Nordjo, Brad Wong
{"title":"Improving Learning in Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries","authors":"N. Angrist, E. Aurino, H. Patrinos, George Psacharopoulos, Emiliana Vegas, R. Nordjo, Brad Wong","doi":"10.1017/bca.2023.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The current challenge of education systems is learning. Across low-income countries (LICs) and lower-middle-income countries (LMCs), 62 % of 10-year-olds could not read at a minimally sufficient level in 2015. This study provides an overview of recent spending on education and its correlation with learning outcomes. We show that the relationship between education spending and learning is historically weak. From 2000 to 2015, LICs and LMCs increased spending on education in primary schools by ~$137 per student, an 80 % inflation-adjusted increase, with no corresponding change on the average learning outcomes. We then conduct a benefit-cost analysis of candidate interventions that could increase learning at low cost. Two interventions – structured pedagogy and, teaching at the right level, with and without a technology component generate large benefit-cost ratios. If deployed uniformly to reach 90 % of the 467 million students in LICs and LMCs, these interventions would cost on average $18 per student per year or $7.6 billion annually, generating $65 in benefits for every $1 spent. The economic logic behind this finding is that the hard and costly work of getting children into primary schools has mostly been accomplished, leaving open the possibility of learning interventions that improve the efficiency of the existing education system at low cost. Our results show that increasing education expenditure by just 6 % could increase learning by 120 % if directed toward these highly cost-effective interventions.","PeriodicalId":45587,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/bca.2023.26","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The current challenge of education systems is learning. Across low-income countries (LICs) and lower-middle-income countries (LMCs), 62 % of 10-year-olds could not read at a minimally sufficient level in 2015. This study provides an overview of recent spending on education and its correlation with learning outcomes. We show that the relationship between education spending and learning is historically weak. From 2000 to 2015, LICs and LMCs increased spending on education in primary schools by ~$137 per student, an 80 % inflation-adjusted increase, with no corresponding change on the average learning outcomes. We then conduct a benefit-cost analysis of candidate interventions that could increase learning at low cost. Two interventions – structured pedagogy and, teaching at the right level, with and without a technology component generate large benefit-cost ratios. If deployed uniformly to reach 90 % of the 467 million students in LICs and LMCs, these interventions would cost on average $18 per student per year or $7.6 billion annually, generating $65 in benefits for every $1 spent. The economic logic behind this finding is that the hard and costly work of getting children into primary schools has mostly been accomplished, leaving open the possibility of learning interventions that improve the efficiency of the existing education system at low cost. Our results show that increasing education expenditure by just 6 % could increase learning by 120 % if directed toward these highly cost-effective interventions.
改善低收入和中低收入国家的学习
当前教育系统面临的挑战是学习。2015年,在低收入国家和中低收入国家,62%的10岁儿童的阅读能力达不到最低水平。本研究概述了最近的教育支出及其与学习成果的关系。我们表明,教育支出和学习之间的关系在历史上是微弱的。从2000年到2015年,低收入国家和低收入国家的小学教育支出每名学生增加了约137美元,经通货膨胀调整后增长了80%,平均学习成果没有相应的变化。然后,我们对可能以低成本增加学习的候选干预措施进行了效益-成本分析。两项干预措施——结构化教学法和适当水平的教学,无论是否包含技术成分——产生了巨大的效益-成本比。如果统一部署,惠及低收入国家和低收入国家4.67亿学生中的90%,这些干预措施将平均每年花费每位学生18美元,或每年76亿美元,每花费1美元产生65美元的收益。这一发现背后的经济逻辑是,让孩子进入小学的艰苦而昂贵的工作大部分已经完成,这就为以低成本提高现有教育系统效率的学习干预留下了可能性。我们的研究结果表明,如果采用这些高成本效益的干预措施,仅增加6%的教育支出就可以使学习增加120%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信