The lack of ethnically sensitive data in Serbia's multiculturalism policy

Q3 Social Sciences
Goran Bašić, Zoran Lutovac
{"title":"The lack of ethnically sensitive data in Serbia's multiculturalism policy","authors":"Goran Bašić, Zoran Lutovac","doi":"10.2298/stnv200420004b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"International organisations whose bodies monitor the realisation and protection of the rights of national and ethnic minorities (Council of Europe, United Nations) have expressed their concern about the lack of data in the Republic of Serbia?s reports on the protection of the rights of national minorities, and they have provided some recommendations in order to amend the situation. Prompted by these remarks, this paper considers the flaws in Serbia?s policy of multiculturalism. The main finding ? that Serbia?s policy of multiculturalism is not founded on verified and measurable data ? has been examined further by indicating the principles and methodologies of collecting data based on ethnic and national identity. By using a range of examples, the paper points to the social issues that occur due to neglect in collecting data on citizens? ethnicity, while the necessity of an interdisciplinary approach to collecting such data is also considered. A holistic approach to researching ethnicity assumes using not only demographic methods, but also methods from and knowledge of other social sciences and humanities. The United Nations supports the idea that the approach to ethnically sensitive data should be holistically founded with its position that all data regarding people?s identity must be based on human rights ? a Human Rights-Based Approach to Data (HRBAD), in which case the relevance of statistical data is promoted.","PeriodicalId":35694,"journal":{"name":"Stanovnistvo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stanovnistvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/stnv200420004b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

International organisations whose bodies monitor the realisation and protection of the rights of national and ethnic minorities (Council of Europe, United Nations) have expressed their concern about the lack of data in the Republic of Serbia?s reports on the protection of the rights of national minorities, and they have provided some recommendations in order to amend the situation. Prompted by these remarks, this paper considers the flaws in Serbia?s policy of multiculturalism. The main finding ? that Serbia?s policy of multiculturalism is not founded on verified and measurable data ? has been examined further by indicating the principles and methodologies of collecting data based on ethnic and national identity. By using a range of examples, the paper points to the social issues that occur due to neglect in collecting data on citizens? ethnicity, while the necessity of an interdisciplinary approach to collecting such data is also considered. A holistic approach to researching ethnicity assumes using not only demographic methods, but also methods from and knowledge of other social sciences and humanities. The United Nations supports the idea that the approach to ethnically sensitive data should be holistically founded with its position that all data regarding people?s identity must be based on human rights ? a Human Rights-Based Approach to Data (HRBAD), in which case the relevance of statistical data is promoted.
塞尔维亚多元文化政策中缺乏种族敏感数据
负责监督少数民族和少数民族权利实现和保护的国际组织(欧洲委员会、联合国)对塞尔维亚共和国缺乏数据表示关切。委员会听取了美国关于保护少数民族权利的报告,并提出了一些建议,以便修正这种情况。在这些言论的推动下,本文对塞尔维亚的缺陷进行了思考。美国的多元文化政策。主要发现是什么?塞尔维亚?美国的多元文化政策不是建立在经过验证和可测量的数据之上的?进一步审查,指出了根据族裔和民族特性收集数据的原则和方法。通过使用一系列的例子,本文指出了由于忽视收集公民数据而发生的社会问题。种族问题,同时也考虑了采用跨学科方法收集这类数据的必要性。研究种族的整体方法不仅使用人口统计学方法,还使用其他社会科学和人文科学的方法和知识。联合国支持这样一种观点,即处理种族敏感数据的方法应该整体地建立在它的立场上,即所有关于人的数据?美国的身份必须以人权为基础?基于人权的数据处理方法(HRBAD),在这种情况下,促进统计数据的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stanovnistvo
Stanovnistvo Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信