The safeness of Ramadan intermittent fasting among patients who undergone primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

S. Amen, B. Rasool, A. Rashid, S. Shakir, Parez M. Qadr, Asia L. Shawkat, Rangen T. Abdulkarem, S. Yousif, D. Lucero-Prisno, Dina Shehata
{"title":"The safeness of Ramadan intermittent fasting among patients who undergone primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention","authors":"S. Amen, B. Rasool, A. Rashid, S. Shakir, Parez M. Qadr, Asia L. Shawkat, Rangen T. Abdulkarem, S. Yousif, D. Lucero-Prisno, Dina Shehata","doi":"10.22317/imj.v6i4.1186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aims to assess the ability and the safety of fasting among patients who underwent PPCI within two specified periods.\nMethods: This study was a Retrospective Cohort Study with a convenience sample size of 200 consecutive patients who were divided into two groups based on the duration of their last primary PCI for an attack of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and the start of the month of Ramadan. The patients were admitted to the Causality Department of the Surgical Specialty Hospital-Cardiac Center, Erbil/Iraq. Group I included patients undergone PPCI 6 weeks or less before the start of Ramadan while group II included patients undergone PPCI for more than 6 weeks before the start of the fasting month of Ramadan. Furthermore, each of these two groups was subdivided based on their ability to complete the Ramadan Intermittent Fasting (RIF) with no recurring or worsening of symptoms into those who fasted the whole Ramadan month, those who did not fast, those who could not continue fasting, and those who passed away. At the end of the RIF, patients’ symptoms were recorded along with their status according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA).\nResults: In a comparison of the proportion of fasting and non-fasting patients among the two groups, 14% in group I were able to complete the 30 days of intermittent fasting during the Ramadan month while this percentage in group II was 54% (P-value=0.001). Among our findings, there were significant associations between post-PCI symptoms (exertional shortness of breath and palpitations) and RIF (P-values=0.001and P-values=0.004, respectively). With regards to New York Heart Association (NYHA) classifications assessment, Group I had a higher proportion of patients classified as Class III and Class IV compared to Group II (P-value=0.001) meaning patients were more symptomatic during the lesser interval between the start of the fasting month and the primary PCI. \nConclusion: Patients with PPCI within the first 6 weeks after the procedure, as well as patients with NYHA class III, are at a higher risk for health deterioration and are advised not to observe RIF.","PeriodicalId":32555,"journal":{"name":"Iraq Medical Journal","volume":"56 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iraq Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22317/imj.v6i4.1186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to assess the ability and the safety of fasting among patients who underwent PPCI within two specified periods. Methods: This study was a Retrospective Cohort Study with a convenience sample size of 200 consecutive patients who were divided into two groups based on the duration of their last primary PCI for an attack of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and the start of the month of Ramadan. The patients were admitted to the Causality Department of the Surgical Specialty Hospital-Cardiac Center, Erbil/Iraq. Group I included patients undergone PPCI 6 weeks or less before the start of Ramadan while group II included patients undergone PPCI for more than 6 weeks before the start of the fasting month of Ramadan. Furthermore, each of these two groups was subdivided based on their ability to complete the Ramadan Intermittent Fasting (RIF) with no recurring or worsening of symptoms into those who fasted the whole Ramadan month, those who did not fast, those who could not continue fasting, and those who passed away. At the end of the RIF, patients’ symptoms were recorded along with their status according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA). Results: In a comparison of the proportion of fasting and non-fasting patients among the two groups, 14% in group I were able to complete the 30 days of intermittent fasting during the Ramadan month while this percentage in group II was 54% (P-value=0.001). Among our findings, there were significant associations between post-PCI symptoms (exertional shortness of breath and palpitations) and RIF (P-values=0.001and P-values=0.004, respectively). With regards to New York Heart Association (NYHA) classifications assessment, Group I had a higher proportion of patients classified as Class III and Class IV compared to Group II (P-value=0.001) meaning patients were more symptomatic during the lesser interval between the start of the fasting month and the primary PCI.  Conclusion: Patients with PPCI within the first 6 weeks after the procedure, as well as patients with NYHA class III, are at a higher risk for health deterioration and are advised not to observe RIF.
初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者斋月间歇性禁食的安全性
目的:本研究旨在评估PPCI患者在两个特定时期内禁食的能力和安全性。方法:本研究是一项回顾性队列研究,样本量为200例连续患者,根据急性心肌梗死(AMI)发作的最后一次PCI持续时间和斋月开始时间分为两组。患者被收住在伊拉克埃尔比勒外科专科医院-心脏中心的因果关系科。第一组包括在斋月开始前6周或更短时间内接受PPCI的患者,而第二组包括在斋月斋戒月开始前6周以上接受PPCI的患者。此外,根据他们完成斋月间歇性禁食(RIF)而没有复发或症状恶化的能力,这两组又被细分为整个斋月禁食的人、没有禁食的人、不能继续禁食的人以及去世的人。在RIF结束时,根据纽约心脏协会(NYHA)记录患者的症状和状态。结果:在两组禁食和非禁食患者的比例比较中,组I中14%的患者能够在斋月期间完成30天的间歇性禁食,而组II中的这一比例为54% (p值=0.001)。在我们的研究结果中,pci术后症状(用力性呼吸短促和心悸)与RIF之间存在显著关联(p值分别为0.001和0.004)。关于纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分类评估,与II组相比,I组有更高比例的患者被分类为III类和IV类(p值=0.001),这意味着患者在禁食月开始和首次PCI之间的较短间隔内症状更明显。结论:手术后6周内PPCI患者以及NYHA III级患者健康恶化的风险较高,建议不要观察RIF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信