S. Widdicombe, K. Isensee, Y. Artioli, J. Gaitán‐Espitia, C. Hauri, J. Newton, M. Wells, S. Dupont
{"title":"Unifying biological field observations to detect and compare ocean acidification impacts across marine species and ecosystems: what to monitor and why","authors":"S. Widdicombe, K. Isensee, Y. Artioli, J. Gaitán‐Espitia, C. Hauri, J. Newton, M. Wells, S. Dupont","doi":"10.5194/os-19-101-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Approximately one-quarter of the CO2 emitted to the\natmosphere annually from human activities is absorbed by the ocean,\nresulting in a reduction of seawater pH and shifts in seawater carbonate\nchemistry. This multi-decadal process, termed “anthropogenic ocean\nacidification” (OA), has been shown to have detrimental impacts on marine\necosystems. Recent years have seen a globally coordinated effort to measure\nthe changes in seawater chemistry caused by OA, with best practices now\navailable for these measurements. In contrast to these substantial advances\nin observing physicochemical changes due to OA, quantifying their\nbiological consequences remains challenging, especially from in situ\nobservations under real-world conditions. Results from 2 decades of\ncontrolled laboratory experiments on OA have given insight into the likely\nprocesses and mechanisms by which elevated CO2 levels affect biological\nprocess, but the manifestation of these process across a plethora of natural\nsituations has yet to be fully explored. This challenge requires us to\nidentify a set of fundamental biological and ecological indicators that are\n(i) relevant across all marine ecosystems, (ii) have a strongly demonstrated\nlink to OA, and (iii) have implications for ocean health and the provision of\necosystem services with impacts on local marine management strategies and\neconomies. This paper draws on the understanding of biological impacts\nprovided by the wealth of previous experiments, as well as the findings of\nrecent meta-analyses, to propose five broad classes of biological indicators\nthat, when coupled with environmental observations including carbonate\nchemistry, would allow the rate and severity of biological change in\nresponse to OA to be observed and compared. These broad indicators are\napplicable to different ecological systems, and the methods for data\nanalysis suggested here would allow researchers to combine biological\nresponse data across regional and global scales by correlating rates of\nbiological change with the rate of change in carbonate chemistry parameters.\nMoreover, a method using laboratory observation to design an optimal\nobserving strategy (frequency and duration) and observe meaningful\nbiological rates of change highlights the factors that need to be considered\nwhen applying our proposed observation strategy. This innovative observing\nmethodology allows inclusion of a wide diversity of marine ecosystems in\nregional and global assessments and has the potential to increase the\ncontribution of OA observations from countries with developing OA science\ncapacity.\n","PeriodicalId":19535,"journal":{"name":"Ocean Science","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/os-19-101-2023","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract. Approximately one-quarter of the CO2 emitted to the
atmosphere annually from human activities is absorbed by the ocean,
resulting in a reduction of seawater pH and shifts in seawater carbonate
chemistry. This multi-decadal process, termed “anthropogenic ocean
acidification” (OA), has been shown to have detrimental impacts on marine
ecosystems. Recent years have seen a globally coordinated effort to measure
the changes in seawater chemistry caused by OA, with best practices now
available for these measurements. In contrast to these substantial advances
in observing physicochemical changes due to OA, quantifying their
biological consequences remains challenging, especially from in situ
observations under real-world conditions. Results from 2 decades of
controlled laboratory experiments on OA have given insight into the likely
processes and mechanisms by which elevated CO2 levels affect biological
process, but the manifestation of these process across a plethora of natural
situations has yet to be fully explored. This challenge requires us to
identify a set of fundamental biological and ecological indicators that are
(i) relevant across all marine ecosystems, (ii) have a strongly demonstrated
link to OA, and (iii) have implications for ocean health and the provision of
ecosystem services with impacts on local marine management strategies and
economies. This paper draws on the understanding of biological impacts
provided by the wealth of previous experiments, as well as the findings of
recent meta-analyses, to propose five broad classes of biological indicators
that, when coupled with environmental observations including carbonate
chemistry, would allow the rate and severity of biological change in
response to OA to be observed and compared. These broad indicators are
applicable to different ecological systems, and the methods for data
analysis suggested here would allow researchers to combine biological
response data across regional and global scales by correlating rates of
biological change with the rate of change in carbonate chemistry parameters.
Moreover, a method using laboratory observation to design an optimal
observing strategy (frequency and duration) and observe meaningful
biological rates of change highlights the factors that need to be considered
when applying our proposed observation strategy. This innovative observing
methodology allows inclusion of a wide diversity of marine ecosystems in
regional and global assessments and has the potential to increase the
contribution of OA observations from countries with developing OA science
capacity.
期刊介绍:
Ocean Science (OS) is a not-for-profit international open-access scientific journal dedicated to the publication and discussion of research articles, short communications, and review papers on all aspects of ocean science: experimental, theoretical, and laboratory. The primary objective is to publish a very high-quality scientific journal with free Internet-based access for researchers and other interested people throughout the world.
Electronic submission of articles is used to keep publication costs to a minimum. The costs will be covered by a moderate per-page charge paid by the authors. The peer-review process also makes use of the Internet. It includes an 8-week online discussion period with the original submitted manuscript and all comments. If accepted, the final revised paper will be published online.
Ocean Science covers the following fields: ocean physics (i.e. ocean structure, circulation, tides, and internal waves); ocean chemistry; biological oceanography; air–sea interactions; ocean models – physical, chemical, biological, and biochemical; coastal and shelf edge processes; paleooceanography.