Quality and inventory decisions in loss-averse distribution channels considering consumer heterogeneity

Q4 Engineering
Z. Jinxi, Haonan He, Shanyong Wang, Qipeng Sun, Ma Fei, Tianshan Ma
{"title":"Quality and inventory decisions in loss-averse distribution channels considering consumer heterogeneity","authors":"Z. Jinxi, Haonan He, Shanyong Wang, Qipeng Sun, Ma Fei, Tianshan Ma","doi":"10.52396/just-2021-0056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we examine firms’ quality and inventory decisions with consumers who behave heterogeneously not only on the product’s valuation (horizontal) but also on the reference price setting (vertical) . Through a three-stage Stackelberg leader-follower model, we derive cost-effective solutions for channel members in two distribution scenarios. Counter-intuitively, the analytical result illustrates that profit-maximizing inventory and quality decisions can be higher when the uncertainty of the market increases because the two-dimensional impacts of market uncertainty on demand are diametrically opposite to each other. Specifically, the vertical uncertainty ( difference in reference effects) has a buffering effect on the aggregate market demand, which is further amplified by loss-aversion behaviors. However, the horizontal uncertainty (heterogeneity of consumer valuation) has a promoting effect on the market demand and induces firms to order more. The numerical result further shows that market demand may not inherit the behavioral bias of individual consumers, leading to an inconsistent relationship between the sensitivity of market demand to gain / loss and consumers’ loss-aversion behaviors. Our findings have implications not only for understanding the stochastic market demand with behaviorally biased consumers but also for determining the channel members’ optimal inventory and quality decisions.","PeriodicalId":17548,"journal":{"name":"中国科学技术大学学报","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国科学技术大学学报","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52396/just-2021-0056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we examine firms’ quality and inventory decisions with consumers who behave heterogeneously not only on the product’s valuation (horizontal) but also on the reference price setting (vertical) . Through a three-stage Stackelberg leader-follower model, we derive cost-effective solutions for channel members in two distribution scenarios. Counter-intuitively, the analytical result illustrates that profit-maximizing inventory and quality decisions can be higher when the uncertainty of the market increases because the two-dimensional impacts of market uncertainty on demand are diametrically opposite to each other. Specifically, the vertical uncertainty ( difference in reference effects) has a buffering effect on the aggregate market demand, which is further amplified by loss-aversion behaviors. However, the horizontal uncertainty (heterogeneity of consumer valuation) has a promoting effect on the market demand and induces firms to order more. The numerical result further shows that market demand may not inherit the behavioral bias of individual consumers, leading to an inconsistent relationship between the sensitivity of market demand to gain / loss and consumers’ loss-aversion behaviors. Our findings have implications not only for understanding the stochastic market demand with behaviorally biased consumers but also for determining the channel members’ optimal inventory and quality decisions.
考虑消费者异质性的规避损失分销渠道中的质量和库存决策
在本文中,我们研究了企业的质量和库存决策,消费者不仅在产品的估值(水平)上表现不同,而且在参考价格设定(垂直)上表现不同。通过三阶段Stackelberg领导-追随者模型,我们在两种分销方案中为渠道成员提供了具有成本效益的解决方案。与直觉相反,分析结果表明,当市场的不确定性增加时,利润最大化的库存和质量决策可以更高,因为市场不确定性对需求的二维影响是截然相反的。具体而言,纵向不确定性(参考效应差异)对市场总需求具有缓冲作用,这种缓冲作用被规避损失的行为进一步放大。然而,横向不确定性(消费者价值的异质性)对市场需求有促进作用,促使企业订购更多。数值结果进一步表明,市场需求可能不会继承消费者个体的行为偏差,导致市场需求对收益/损失的敏感性与消费者的损失厌恶行为之间的关系不一致。我们的研究结果不仅对理解具有行为偏见的消费者的随机市场需求有意义,而且对确定渠道成员的最佳库存和质量决策也有意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国科学技术大学学报
中国科学技术大学学报 Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5692
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信