What Is a Woman? A Decolonial African Feminist Analysis of Womanhoods in Lesotho

IF 0.5 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
N. Mohlabane, M. Tshoaedi
{"title":"What Is a Woman? A Decolonial African Feminist Analysis of Womanhoods in Lesotho","authors":"N. Mohlabane, M. Tshoaedi","doi":"10.1080/21528586.2021.2015716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Feminists across a variety of contexts have written extensively about womanhood. Recently the question of difference—to account for the cultural, ethnic and racial diversity among women themselves—has become a highly contested issue in feminist theories. Tensions have ensued where “western feminisms” have been criticised for bias that is embedded in the objectification of “different” women regarded as “other” as “traditional” and therefore inferior. Several African feminists have also questioned “western” concepts such as gender and their relevance to the African context. Womanhood—a set of socially defined attributes appropriate for women—holds different meanings depending on the context in which it is defined. Drawing on decolonial African feminist approaches, this qualitative study aimed to understand the meaning of “womanhood” from the perspectives of never-married women (methepa) in Lesotho, where womanhood is defined in terms of marriage. In-depth interviews were conducted with 20 methepa from various contexts in Lesotho. As opposed to the “traditional” definition that accounts for a single attribute—woman as “wife”—methepa defined “womanhood” in different ways. By foregrounding respectability, sexual empowerment, mothering and personhood, these women deconstructed binarised gendered categories. This paper builds on the indigenous and also draws from the indigenous for knowledge production. In so doing, it deconstructs metanarratives and reconfigures knowledges around women’s sexualities, agency and “womanhoods” in Lesotho, as a contribution to pluriversal knowledge production.","PeriodicalId":44730,"journal":{"name":"South African Review of Sociology","volume":"16 1","pages":"40 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Review of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21528586.2021.2015716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Feminists across a variety of contexts have written extensively about womanhood. Recently the question of difference—to account for the cultural, ethnic and racial diversity among women themselves—has become a highly contested issue in feminist theories. Tensions have ensued where “western feminisms” have been criticised for bias that is embedded in the objectification of “different” women regarded as “other” as “traditional” and therefore inferior. Several African feminists have also questioned “western” concepts such as gender and their relevance to the African context. Womanhood—a set of socially defined attributes appropriate for women—holds different meanings depending on the context in which it is defined. Drawing on decolonial African feminist approaches, this qualitative study aimed to understand the meaning of “womanhood” from the perspectives of never-married women (methepa) in Lesotho, where womanhood is defined in terms of marriage. In-depth interviews were conducted with 20 methepa from various contexts in Lesotho. As opposed to the “traditional” definition that accounts for a single attribute—woman as “wife”—methepa defined “womanhood” in different ways. By foregrounding respectability, sexual empowerment, mothering and personhood, these women deconstructed binarised gendered categories. This paper builds on the indigenous and also draws from the indigenous for knowledge production. In so doing, it deconstructs metanarratives and reconfigures knowledges around women’s sexualities, agency and “womanhoods” in Lesotho, as a contribution to pluriversal knowledge production.
什么是女人?非殖民化的非洲女性主义对莱索托女性的分析
女权主义者在各种背景下都写了大量关于女性的文章。最近,差异问题——解释女性自身的文化、民族和种族多样性——已经成为女权主义理论中一个备受争议的问题。紧张局势随之而来,“西方女权主义者”被批评为偏见,这种偏见根植于将“不同”女性物化,将其视为“他者”、“传统”、因此低人一等。一些非洲女权主义者也质疑“西方”概念,如性别及其与非洲环境的相关性。女性身份——一组适合女性的社会定义的属性——根据其定义的上下文具有不同的含义。利用非殖民化的非洲女权主义方法,这项定性研究旨在从莱索托从未结婚的妇女(methepa)的角度理解“女性”的含义,在莱索托,女性是根据婚姻来定义的。对来自莱索托不同背景的20名吸毒者进行了深入访谈。与“传统”定义的单一属性——女人是“妻子”——相反,美西帕以不同的方式定义了“女性”。通过强调体面、性赋权、母性和人格,这些女性解构了二元性别分类。本文以本土为基础,借鉴本土知识生产。在这样做的过程中,它解构了元叙事,并重新配置了莱索托妇女性行为、能动性和“女性”的知识,作为对多元知识生产的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
25.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信