No more “Us’’ Versus “Others”: Critique of Cultural Trauma in the Movie Partition by Vic Sarin

Pub Date : 2021-09-02 DOI:10.3126/litstud.v34i01.39541
Yog Raj Lamichhane
{"title":"No more “Us’’ Versus “Others”: Critique of Cultural Trauma in the Movie Partition by Vic Sarin","authors":"Yog Raj Lamichhane","doi":"10.3126/litstud.v34i01.39541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 15 August 1947, the glory of Indian Independence has introduced with a political hubris, dividing British India into two separate independent nations: secular India and Islamic Pakistan. The partition brings trauma in the life of millions; nevertheless, this trauma itself becomes the victim of nationhood and community both in official history and literary writing. In this background, the study examines how a Hollywood movie Partition directed by Vic Sarin in 2007, exceptionally surpasses that tendency of dividing the community into ‘‘as’’ and ‘‘others’’ imparting Indian partition trauma politically. While analyzing the behavior and action of major characters along with the overall imparted theme of the movie, it rethinks the customary archives of community and nationhood depicting partition memory objectively. The protagonist never pronounces a single word of communal intolerance even when he has been mocked and tortured in the name of religion. Conversely, some characters in the movie always attempt to massacre the truth of trauma spreading communal bile; however, the overall essence and message of the movie keep that alive. Rethinking cultural trauma and using the approach of memory, the study concludes that this in-between movie appears as “West Running Brook” that exceeds the common communalization and perpetual politicization in the history of depicting Indian partition. Eventually, the study establishes that sharing pain seems to work as a healer among victims to overcome their trauma on one side and uniquely it adjoins the British as a party in Indian partition trauma in the next, which has been blurred considering insignificant in the one-to-one conflict between two giants.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/litstud.v34i01.39541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On 15 August 1947, the glory of Indian Independence has introduced with a political hubris, dividing British India into two separate independent nations: secular India and Islamic Pakistan. The partition brings trauma in the life of millions; nevertheless, this trauma itself becomes the victim of nationhood and community both in official history and literary writing. In this background, the study examines how a Hollywood movie Partition directed by Vic Sarin in 2007, exceptionally surpasses that tendency of dividing the community into ‘‘as’’ and ‘‘others’’ imparting Indian partition trauma politically. While analyzing the behavior and action of major characters along with the overall imparted theme of the movie, it rethinks the customary archives of community and nationhood depicting partition memory objectively. The protagonist never pronounces a single word of communal intolerance even when he has been mocked and tortured in the name of religion. Conversely, some characters in the movie always attempt to massacre the truth of trauma spreading communal bile; however, the overall essence and message of the movie keep that alive. Rethinking cultural trauma and using the approach of memory, the study concludes that this in-between movie appears as “West Running Brook” that exceeds the common communalization and perpetual politicization in the history of depicting Indian partition. Eventually, the study establishes that sharing pain seems to work as a healer among victims to overcome their trauma on one side and uniquely it adjoins the British as a party in Indian partition trauma in the next, which has been blurred considering insignificant in the one-to-one conflict between two giants.
分享
查看原文
不再有“我们”对“他者”:维克·沙林对电影分割中的文化创伤的批判
1947年8月15日,印度独立的荣耀带来了政治上的傲慢,将英属印度分裂为两个独立的国家:世俗的印度和伊斯兰教的巴基斯坦。分割给数百万人的生活带来创伤;然而,这种创伤本身在官方历史和文学写作中都成为国家和社会的受害者。在此背景下,本研究考察了维克·沙林(Vic Sarin)于2007年执导的好莱坞电影《分区》(Partition)如何异常地超越了将社区划分为“作为”和“他者”的倾向,从而在政治上给印度人带来了分区创伤。在分析主要人物的行为和行动的同时,结合电影所传达的整体主题,对社区和国家的习惯档案进行了反思,客观地描绘了分区记忆。主人公即使在以宗教的名义受到嘲笑和折磨的时候,也从来没有说过一个关于集体不容忍的词。相反,电影中的一些人物总是试图屠杀创伤的真相,传播公共胆汁;然而,电影的整体本质和信息保持了这种活力。通过对文化创伤的重新思考,运用记忆的方法,研究得出结论:这部中间电影超越了印度分治历史上常见的公社化和永久政治化,呈现为《西流溪》。最终,研究表明,一方面,分担痛苦似乎可以治愈受害者的创伤,另一方面,它独特地与英国作为印度分治创伤的一方相关联,这在两个大国之间的一对一冲突中被认为是微不足道的,因此被模糊了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信