THE POTENTIAL PROSPECT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) IN ARBITRATION FROM THE INTERNATIONAL, NATIONAL AND ISLAMIC PERSPECTIVES

IF 1.4 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Mohammad Azam Hussain, Mohamad Fateh Labanieh, Nazli Mahdzir, Nooraini Sulaiman, Omar Saleh Abdullah Bawazir
{"title":"THE POTENTIAL PROSPECT OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) IN ARBITRATION FROM THE INTERNATIONAL, NATIONAL AND ISLAMIC PERSPECTIVES","authors":"Mohammad Azam Hussain, Mohamad Fateh Labanieh, Nazli Mahdzir, Nooraini Sulaiman, Omar Saleh Abdullah Bawazir","doi":"10.32890/jis2023.19.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Arbitration is the most widespread mechanism for resolving disputes in the modern and Islamic eras. The current global tendency calls for an increase in the integration of disruptive technology, such as artificial intelligence (AI), into arbitration. Using doctrinal legal research methodology, this article examines the potential prospect of artificial intelligence (AI) in arbitration from international, national, and Islamic perspectives. To achieve that, several international arbitration laws, such as the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958 and UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985, national arbitration laws, such as Arbitration Act 2005 (Act 646), UK Arbitration Act 1996, and Singaporean Arbitration Act 2011, and the Islamic law were analysed. The collected data was analytically and critically analysed using the content analysis method. It is found that AI technologies would bring added value to arbitration if they are appropriately employed. However, from a legal perspective, arbitration laws are not mature enough to absorb AI technologies. Besides, it has been discovered that Islam does not prohibit AI technologies as long as they can serve humanity. According to the Islamic point of view, an artificial intelligence arbitrator (AIA) cannot replace human arbitrators. Finally, this article provides several recommendations to enhance the use of AI technologies and AIA in arbitration. This, in turn, would help in creating a modern, prosperous, and just world and improving the international relations between nations, international organisations, and individuals from different countries as any of them could resolve their disputes effectively.","PeriodicalId":18593,"journal":{"name":"Millennium - Journal of International Studies","volume":"82 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Millennium - Journal of International Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32890/jis2023.19.1.4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Arbitration is the most widespread mechanism for resolving disputes in the modern and Islamic eras. The current global tendency calls for an increase in the integration of disruptive technology, such as artificial intelligence (AI), into arbitration. Using doctrinal legal research methodology, this article examines the potential prospect of artificial intelligence (AI) in arbitration from international, national, and Islamic perspectives. To achieve that, several international arbitration laws, such as the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958 and UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration 1985, national arbitration laws, such as Arbitration Act 2005 (Act 646), UK Arbitration Act 1996, and Singaporean Arbitration Act 2011, and the Islamic law were analysed. The collected data was analytically and critically analysed using the content analysis method. It is found that AI technologies would bring added value to arbitration if they are appropriately employed. However, from a legal perspective, arbitration laws are not mature enough to absorb AI technologies. Besides, it has been discovered that Islam does not prohibit AI technologies as long as they can serve humanity. According to the Islamic point of view, an artificial intelligence arbitrator (AIA) cannot replace human arbitrators. Finally, this article provides several recommendations to enhance the use of AI technologies and AIA in arbitration. This, in turn, would help in creating a modern, prosperous, and just world and improving the international relations between nations, international organisations, and individuals from different countries as any of them could resolve their disputes effectively.
从国际、国家和伊斯兰的角度看人工智能(ai)在仲裁中的潜在前景
仲裁是现代和伊斯兰时代解决争端最广泛的机制。当前的全球趋势要求将人工智能(AI)等颠覆性技术更多地融入仲裁。本文采用理论法律研究方法,从国际、国家和伊斯兰的角度考察了人工智能(AI)在仲裁中的潜在前景。为此,我们分析了若干国际仲裁法,如《1958年承认及执行外国仲裁裁决公约》和《1985年贸易法委员会国际商事仲裁示范法》、国家仲裁法,如《2005年仲裁法》(第646号法案)、《1996年英国仲裁法》和《2011年新加坡仲裁法》,以及伊斯兰法。采用内容分析法对收集到的数据进行分析和批判性分析。研究发现,如果人工智能技术得到适当应用,将为仲裁带来附加价值。然而,从法律的角度来看,仲裁法律还不够成熟,无法吸收人工智能技术。此外,人们发现,只要人工智能技术能够为人类服务,伊斯兰教并不禁止人工智能技术。根据伊斯兰教的观点,人工智能仲裁员(AIA)不能取代人类仲裁员。最后,本文提出了一些建议,以加强人工智能技术和AIA在仲裁中的应用。反过来,这将有助于建立一个现代、繁荣和公正的世界,并改善国家、国际组织和不同国家的个人之间的国际关系,因为他们中的任何一个都可以有效地解决他们的争端。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信