Obraz v velikem planu in pripovedna transparentnost

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, SLAVIC
Barbara Zorman
{"title":"Obraz v velikem planu in pripovedna transparentnost","authors":"Barbara Zorman","doi":"10.3986/PKN.V43.I1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In its first part, the article compares various theoretical insights into the topic, beginning with Balazs’s claim that the magnification and proximity of the face in close-up replace narrative movement, i.e. action, with micromovement that represents subjectivity. For Deleuze, the face in close-up is deterritorialized into the “feeling-thing,” the entity as the set-up of the affect. For Deleuze, the close-up abstracts the face from its bearer. Furthermore, the film face as a mask is presented (Barthes). Besides the metaphor of the cinema as a mirror within psychoanalytical film theory, the insights of the cognitive film theory are analyzed, particularly the function of the face in the “scenes of empathy” (Plantinga). The second part examines the role of the face in Rok Bicek’s first feature film Razredni sovražnik (Class Enemy, 2013), which presents the revolt of a class against an authoritative teacher following the suicide of their classmate Sabina. This film exposes the opaqueness of the face most notably in the representation of Sabina’s face, particularly as it is presented within the context of her friend’s mental images, memories. But the mysteriousness of her face is most prominent in the masks created from the photography of Sabina’s face that her classmates put on in an act of rebellion against their teacher. Sabina’s face is the film’s blind spot: although completely exposed to our gaze, its meaning remains ambiguous, even unattainable. Such representation seems to reject the face as “an instrument of signification” (Eleftheriotis).","PeriodicalId":52032,"journal":{"name":"Primerjalna Knjizevnost","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primerjalna Knjizevnost","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3986/PKN.V43.I1.04","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, SLAVIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In its first part, the article compares various theoretical insights into the topic, beginning with Balazs’s claim that the magnification and proximity of the face in close-up replace narrative movement, i.e. action, with micromovement that represents subjectivity. For Deleuze, the face in close-up is deterritorialized into the “feeling-thing,” the entity as the set-up of the affect. For Deleuze, the close-up abstracts the face from its bearer. Furthermore, the film face as a mask is presented (Barthes). Besides the metaphor of the cinema as a mirror within psychoanalytical film theory, the insights of the cognitive film theory are analyzed, particularly the function of the face in the “scenes of empathy” (Plantinga). The second part examines the role of the face in Rok Bicek’s first feature film Razredni sovražnik (Class Enemy, 2013), which presents the revolt of a class against an authoritative teacher following the suicide of their classmate Sabina. This film exposes the opaqueness of the face most notably in the representation of Sabina’s face, particularly as it is presented within the context of her friend’s mental images, memories. But the mysteriousness of her face is most prominent in the masks created from the photography of Sabina’s face that her classmates put on in an act of rebellion against their teacher. Sabina’s face is the film’s blind spot: although completely exposed to our gaze, its meaning remains ambiguous, even unattainable. Such representation seems to reject the face as “an instrument of signification” (Eleftheriotis).
在第一部分中,文章比较了关于这一主题的各种理论见解,首先是巴拉兹的观点,即特写中脸部的放大和接近用代表主体性的微运动取代了叙事运动,即行动。对于德勒兹来说,特写中的脸被去地域化为“感觉事物”,即作为情感设置的实体。对于德勒兹来说,特写将脸部从它的承载者中抽象出来。此外,作为面具的电影脸被呈现出来(巴特)。除了精神分析电影理论中将电影比喻为一面镜子之外,本文还分析了认知电影理论的见解,特别是脸在“共情场景”中的作用(Plantinga)。第二部分考察了脸在Rok Bicek的第一部长片Razredni sovražnik(阶级敌人,2013)中的作用,它呈现了一个班级在他们的同学Sabina自杀后对权威老师的反抗。这部电影揭示了脸的不透明性,尤其是在萨宾娜的脸的表现中,尤其是在她朋友的心理图像和记忆的背景下。但她脸上的神秘感在萨比娜的同学们为反抗老师而戴上的面具中最为突出。这些面具是根据萨比娜的脸的照片制作的。萨宾娜的脸是影片的盲点:虽然完全暴露在我们的视线中,但它的意义仍然模糊不清,甚至无法理解。这样的表现似乎拒绝了脸作为“意义的工具”(Eleftheriotis)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Primerjalna Knjizevnost
Primerjalna Knjizevnost LITERATURE, SLAVIC-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信