CRITICAL REVIEW OF A META-ANALYSIS FOR THE EFFECT OF SINGLE AND MULTIPLE SETS OF RESISTANCE TRAINING ON STRENGTH GAINS

R. N. Carpinelli
{"title":"CRITICAL REVIEW OF A META-ANALYSIS FOR THE EFFECT OF SINGLE AND MULTIPLE SETS OF RESISTANCE TRAINING ON STRENGTH GAINS","authors":"R. N. Carpinelli","doi":"10.5604/17342260.1011393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A meta-analysis is a controversial statistical procedure that combines the data from several independent studies in an attempt to produce an estimate for the effectiveness of a specific intervention. The validity of a meta-analysis, also known by its critics as numerological abracadabra, is dependent on the arbitrarily defined criteria and discrimination of the analyst, and more importantly, on the quality of the inclusive studies. The focus of this commentary is a meta-analysis by Krieger, who claimed that multiple sets of each exercise are superior to a single set of each exercise for increasing muscular strength. Some examples of the inclusive studies that he awarded the highest quality scores are shown in this Critical Review to be very poor quality studies and not acceptable for inclusion in a meta-analysis.","PeriodicalId":93474,"journal":{"name":"Medicina sportiva (Krakow, Poland : English ed.)","volume":"12 1","pages":"122-130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina sportiva (Krakow, Poland : English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/17342260.1011393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

A meta-analysis is a controversial statistical procedure that combines the data from several independent studies in an attempt to produce an estimate for the effectiveness of a specific intervention. The validity of a meta-analysis, also known by its critics as numerological abracadabra, is dependent on the arbitrarily defined criteria and discrimination of the analyst, and more importantly, on the quality of the inclusive studies. The focus of this commentary is a meta-analysis by Krieger, who claimed that multiple sets of each exercise are superior to a single set of each exercise for increasing muscular strength. Some examples of the inclusive studies that he awarded the highest quality scores are shown in this Critical Review to be very poor quality studies and not acceptable for inclusion in a meta-analysis.
对单组和多组阻力训练对力量增益影响的荟萃分析的批判性回顾
荟萃分析是一种有争议的统计程序,它将来自几个独立研究的数据结合起来,试图对特定干预措施的有效性进行估计。元分析的有效性,也被其批评者称为数字学的abracadabra,取决于任意定义的标准和分析师的歧视,更重要的是,取决于包容性研究的质量。这篇评论的重点是克里格的荟萃分析,他声称在增加肌肉力量方面,每种运动的多组比每种运动的单组要好。他给予最高质量分数的一些包容性研究的例子在这篇批判性评论中显示是非常低质量的研究,不能被纳入元分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信