Measuring the Input Rank in Global Supply Networks

Armando Rungi, Loredana Fattorini, Kenan Huremović
{"title":"Measuring the Input Rank in Global Supply Networks","authors":"Armando Rungi, Loredana Fattorini, Kenan Huremović","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3488349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we introduce the Input Rank as a measure to study the organization of global supply networks at the firm level. We model the case of a firm that needs assessing the technological relevance of each direct and indirect supplier on a network-like production function with labor and intermediate inputs. In our framework, an input is technologically more relevant if a shock on that upstream market can hit harder the marginal costs of a downstream buyer, considering the topology of the supply structure. A higher labor intensity at each stage buffers the transmission of upstream shocks in the network. In addition, we provide for the possibility that producers have limited knowledge of inputs in the supply network, hence they can underestimate the relevance of more distant inputs. After applications, the Input Rank returns a matrix of technological centralities that order any direct or indirect input for a representative firm in any output industry. We compute the Input Rank on U.S. and world input-output tables. Finally, we test how it correlates with choices of vertical integration made by 20,489 U.S. parent companies controlling 154,836 affiliates worldwide. We find that a higher Input Rank is positively associated with higher odds that that input is vertically integrated, relatively more when final demand is elastic. A supplier's Input Rank remains a significant predictor of a firm's decision to integrate even after controlling for the relative positions on upstreamness(downstreamness) segments.","PeriodicalId":11062,"journal":{"name":"Development of Innovation eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development of Innovation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3488349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce the Input Rank as a measure to study the organization of global supply networks at the firm level. We model the case of a firm that needs assessing the technological relevance of each direct and indirect supplier on a network-like production function with labor and intermediate inputs. In our framework, an input is technologically more relevant if a shock on that upstream market can hit harder the marginal costs of a downstream buyer, considering the topology of the supply structure. A higher labor intensity at each stage buffers the transmission of upstream shocks in the network. In addition, we provide for the possibility that producers have limited knowledge of inputs in the supply network, hence they can underestimate the relevance of more distant inputs. After applications, the Input Rank returns a matrix of technological centralities that order any direct or indirect input for a representative firm in any output industry. We compute the Input Rank on U.S. and world input-output tables. Finally, we test how it correlates with choices of vertical integration made by 20,489 U.S. parent companies controlling 154,836 affiliates worldwide. We find that a higher Input Rank is positively associated with higher odds that that input is vertically integrated, relatively more when final demand is elastic. A supplier's Input Rank remains a significant predictor of a firm's decision to integrate even after controlling for the relative positions on upstreamness(downstreamness) segments.
衡量全球供应网络中的投入等级
本文在企业层面上引入投入等级这一度量来研究全球供应网络的组织。我们建立了一个公司的模型,该公司需要评估每个直接和间接供应商在具有劳动力和中间投入的网络生产函数上的技术相关性。在我们的框架中,考虑到供应结构的拓扑结构,如果上游市场的冲击能更严重地打击下游买家的边际成本,那么投入在技术上就更相关。每个阶段较高的劳动强度缓冲了网络中上游冲击的传输。此外,我们考虑到生产者对供应网络中投入的知识有限的可能性,因此他们可能低估了更远投入的相关性。在应用程序之后,输入排名返回一个技术中心矩阵,该矩阵对任何输出行业中具有代表性的企业的任何直接或间接输入进行排序。我们根据美国和世界的投入产出表计算投入排名。最后,我们测试了它与控制全球154,836家子公司的20,489家美国母公司所做的垂直整合选择的相关性。我们发现,更高的投入等级与更高的投入垂直整合的可能性呈正相关,当最终需求是弹性的时,相对更大。即使在控制了上游(下游)部分的相对位置之后,供应商的输入等级仍然是公司整合决策的重要预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信