A Pathway to Counterproductive Knowledge Behaviour: Integrating Knowledge Hoarding, Knowledge Withholding, and Knowledge Hiding

Pub Date : 2023-04-17 DOI:10.5530/jscires.12.1.019
Z. Zamrudi
{"title":"A Pathway to Counterproductive Knowledge Behaviour: Integrating Knowledge Hoarding, Knowledge Withholding, and Knowledge Hiding","authors":"Z. Zamrudi","doi":"10.5530/jscires.12.1.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Counterproductive knowledge behaviour is considered to negatively impact all organizations, either in business or public institutions. Objectives: This study aims to provide a comprehensive picture of knowledge management, integrating three counterproductive knowledge behaviours: knowledge hoarding, knowledge withholding, and knowledge hiding. Materials and Methods: This study uses a bibliometric approach using 337 documents from the Scopus database to understand the field development behind counterproductive knowledge behaviours. The data analysis involves the evaluation of performance analysis and thematic mapping. The performance analysis is aimed to understand the pioneering authors and manuscripts within the field, while the scientific maps aim to depict the thematic development of current fields. The performance analysis results discover pioneering authors, trending topics, prominent sources and articles, and country-wise performance. Results: The performance analysis indicates growing interest since 2011 mainly published in “knowledge” theme journal, mainly authored by Chinese researcher. However, from the authorship results, this research also pin-point pioneering author within the field. The results from scientific map analysis indicate different concepts between knowledge hoarding, knowledge withholding, and knowledge hiding while at the same time discovering the position of knowledge sharing within these three concepts. This study also discovers several basic theories on counterproductive knowledge behaviour. Conclusion: This research contributes to the scientific community by comprehensively combining the performance and scientific map analysis to measure the research development in counterproductive knowledge behaviour. Additionally, this paper provide future research agenda within the fields inviting future researcher to explore any potential theoretical integration, model integration such as involving technological aspect.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.12.1.019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Counterproductive knowledge behaviour is considered to negatively impact all organizations, either in business or public institutions. Objectives: This study aims to provide a comprehensive picture of knowledge management, integrating three counterproductive knowledge behaviours: knowledge hoarding, knowledge withholding, and knowledge hiding. Materials and Methods: This study uses a bibliometric approach using 337 documents from the Scopus database to understand the field development behind counterproductive knowledge behaviours. The data analysis involves the evaluation of performance analysis and thematic mapping. The performance analysis is aimed to understand the pioneering authors and manuscripts within the field, while the scientific maps aim to depict the thematic development of current fields. The performance analysis results discover pioneering authors, trending topics, prominent sources and articles, and country-wise performance. Results: The performance analysis indicates growing interest since 2011 mainly published in “knowledge” theme journal, mainly authored by Chinese researcher. However, from the authorship results, this research also pin-point pioneering author within the field. The results from scientific map analysis indicate different concepts between knowledge hoarding, knowledge withholding, and knowledge hiding while at the same time discovering the position of knowledge sharing within these three concepts. This study also discovers several basic theories on counterproductive knowledge behaviour. Conclusion: This research contributes to the scientific community by comprehensively combining the performance and scientific map analysis to measure the research development in counterproductive knowledge behaviour. Additionally, this paper provide future research agenda within the fields inviting future researcher to explore any potential theoretical integration, model integration such as involving technological aspect.
分享
查看原文
反生产知识行为的途径:整合知识囤积、知识隐瞒和知识隐藏
引言:反生产知识行为被认为对所有组织产生负面影响,无论是在商业还是公共机构。目的:本研究旨在提供知识管理的全貌,整合三种反生产知识行为:知识囤积、知识隐瞒和知识隐藏。材料和方法:本研究采用文献计量学方法,使用Scopus数据库中的337篇文献来了解反生产知识行为背后的领域发展。数据分析涉及绩效评价分析和专题制图。绩效分析的目的是了解该领域的先驱作者和手稿,而科学地图的目的是描绘当前领域的专题发展。性能分析结果发现先锋作者,热门话题,突出的来源和文章,和国家明智的表现。结果:绩效分析表明,自2011年以来,主要发表在“知识”主题期刊上,主要由中国研究者撰写。不过,从作者成果来看,本研究也在该领域内锁定了先锋作者。科学图谱分析的结果揭示了知识囤积、知识隐瞒和知识隐藏的不同概念,同时发现了知识共享在这三个概念中的位置。本研究还发现了反生产知识行为的几个基本理论。结论:本研究将绩效分析与科学图谱分析相结合,以衡量反生产知识行为的研究进展,为科学界做出了贡献。此外,本文还提出了未来领域内的研究议程,邀请未来的研究者探索任何潜在的理论整合、模型整合,如涉及技术方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信