Part II Means of Protection, Ch.VIII Inter-American Court of Human Rights, s.1 Organization, Article 57

Hennebel Ludovic, T. Hélène
{"title":"Part II Means of Protection, Ch.VIII Inter-American Court of Human Rights, s.1 Organization, Article 57","authors":"Hennebel Ludovic, T. Hélène","doi":"10.1093/law/9780190222345.003.0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter studies Article 57 of the American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR). Article 57 of the ACHR deals with the procedural status of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights before the Inter-American Court. It addresses the crucial question of the procedural role of the Commission in the judicial litigation procedure. Therefore, Article 57 is closely linked to Article 61 of the ACHR, which designates the entities—States Parties and the Commission—entitled to refer cases to the Court. One of the differences between the two articles is that Article 61 provides to the Commission an option to refer the matter to the Commission, while Article 57 imposes a procedural obligation to the Commission. The Commission cannot choose not to appear before the Court.","PeriodicalId":22363,"journal":{"name":"The American Convention on Human Rights","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Convention on Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780190222345.003.0057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter studies Article 57 of the American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR). Article 57 of the ACHR deals with the procedural status of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights before the Inter-American Court. It addresses the crucial question of the procedural role of the Commission in the judicial litigation procedure. Therefore, Article 57 is closely linked to Article 61 of the ACHR, which designates the entities—States Parties and the Commission—entitled to refer cases to the Court. One of the differences between the two articles is that Article 61 provides to the Commission an option to refer the matter to the Commission, while Article 57 imposes a procedural obligation to the Commission. The Commission cannot choose not to appear before the Court.
第二部分保护手段,第八章美洲人权法院,第1段组织,第五十七条
本章研究《美洲人权公约》第57条。《美洲人权公约》第57条规定了美洲人权委员会在美洲法院的程序地位。它讨论了委员会在司法诉讼程序中的程序性作用这一关键问题。因此,第57条与《人权公约》第61条密切相关,该条指定实体- -缔约国和委员会- -有权将案件提交法院。这两条之间的区别之一是,第61条规定委员会可以选择将该事项提交委员会,而第57条则规定了对委员会的程序性义务。委员会不能选择不出庭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信