Vidensorganisation: Skal bibliotekarer organisere al information på Internettet?

Q4 Computer Science
Birger Hjørland
{"title":"Vidensorganisation: Skal bibliotekarer organisere al information på Internettet?","authors":"Birger Hjørland","doi":"10.7146/bibarb.v0i65.97823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A first year library school student suggested that in the future librarians should index \"all information\" on the Internet. This article takes this statement as its point of departure for a discussion about what knowledge organization means, what librarians do today, and what their education should prepare them for in the future. It also analyses what library and information science implies and how it should be further developed. The article presents two basic issues: Bibliographical control and Document representation and shows how these issues are related through the concept of relevance. \n \nTwo different ways of approaching these problems are presented. On the one hand there is a rationalist approach based on centralized bibliographical control and indexing in mutually exclusive and exhaustive classes. On the other hand there is a more organic approach based on selecting and indexing for different user groups and needs. The article presents historical and theoretical approaches. It shows how different kinds of organizing information is carried out by many different professions, at several parallel levels (including mechanical indexing). The article concludes that there are no fixed limits to the scope of library education, but that it is important to respect the expertise of other professions and to consider what the specific basis is for the LIS profession.","PeriodicalId":35232,"journal":{"name":"Human IT","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human IT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/bibarb.v0i65.97823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A first year library school student suggested that in the future librarians should index "all information" on the Internet. This article takes this statement as its point of departure for a discussion about what knowledge organization means, what librarians do today, and what their education should prepare them for in the future. It also analyses what library and information science implies and how it should be further developed. The article presents two basic issues: Bibliographical control and Document representation and shows how these issues are related through the concept of relevance. Two different ways of approaching these problems are presented. On the one hand there is a rationalist approach based on centralized bibliographical control and indexing in mutually exclusive and exhaustive classes. On the other hand there is a more organic approach based on selecting and indexing for different user groups and needs. The article presents historical and theoretical approaches. It shows how different kinds of organizing information is carried out by many different professions, at several parallel levels (including mechanical indexing). The article concludes that there are no fixed limits to the scope of library education, but that it is important to respect the expertise of other professions and to consider what the specific basis is for the LIS profession.
一位图书馆学院的一年级学生建议,未来图书馆员应该索引互联网上的“所有信息”。本文以这句话为出发点,讨论知识组织意味着什么,图书馆员今天做什么,以及他们的教育应该为他们未来做什么准备。本文还分析了图书馆情报学的含义以及如何进一步发展图书馆情报学。本文提出了两个基本问题:书目控制和文献表示,并通过相关性的概念说明了这两个问题是如何联系起来的。提出了处理这些问题的两种不同方法。一方面,有一种基于集中书目控制和索引的理性主义方法,这种方法是在互斥和详尽的类别中进行的。另一方面,有一种基于选择和索引不同用户群体和需求的更有机的方法。本文提出了历史和理论的方法。它显示了不同种类的组织信息是如何由许多不同的专业在几个平行的层次上进行的(包括机械索引)。本文认为,图书馆教育的范围没有固定的界限,但重要的是要尊重其他专业的专业知识,并考虑图书馆专业的具体基础是什么。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human IT
Human IT Computer Science-Information Systems
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信