Book Review: Content Strategy in Technical Communication by Giuseppe, G., Labriola, J.T., & Ruszkiewicz, S.

J. Tham
{"title":"Book Review: Content Strategy in Technical Communication by Giuseppe, G., Labriola, J.T., & Ruszkiewicz, S.","authors":"J. Tham","doi":"10.1177/00472816211069987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The scholarly field of technical communication became interested in the emerging areas of content development and content management nearly 20 years ago, when Albers and Mazur (2003) introduced “content” as an available term to describe information artifacts (or architecture) and express the complexity in the ways these artifacts are created and consumed. Yet, a quick keyword search within the top academic journals for technical and professional communication yields surprisingly minimal returns on researched discussions about content practices—Rebekka Andersen and Tatiana Batova (2015) published an integrative review that reported only 22 mentions of content management from scholarly sources. The lack of academic resources “to establish firm best practices and suitable pedagogies for this emerging discipline” (p. 1) is what Guiseppe Getto, Jack Labriola, and Sheryl Ruszkiewicz aimed to address in their edited collection, Content Strategy in Technical Communication. As Series Editor Tharon Howard revealed, this collection is the first edited volume about content strategy that included not only the term in its title but more importantly a collection of scholarly voices by those who research and teach content strategy. This collection promised to showcase innovative practices and pedagogies, and identify best practices to meet the current and future needs of technical communication. In their introduction, the editors defined the practice of content strategy as “[planning] for the creation, publication, and governance of useful, usable information in a repeatable manner by creating consistently structured content for reuse, managing that content in a definitive source, and assembling content on demand to meet audience needs” (p. 2). This lengthy description in Chapter 1 is used as the basis for the applications, research, and assessment of content strategy work throughout the book. Also included in the editors’ introduction is a preliminary set of best practices based on the pieces curated in this volume. These best practices were sorted into three categories: (1) “strategies for developing and deploying content,” (2) “use of emerging technologies and systems for managing and publishing content,” and (3) “usability and Book Reviews","PeriodicalId":93788,"journal":{"name":"Journal of technical writing and communication","volume":"19 1","pages":"236 - 239"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of technical writing and communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00472816211069987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The scholarly field of technical communication became interested in the emerging areas of content development and content management nearly 20 years ago, when Albers and Mazur (2003) introduced “content” as an available term to describe information artifacts (or architecture) and express the complexity in the ways these artifacts are created and consumed. Yet, a quick keyword search within the top academic journals for technical and professional communication yields surprisingly minimal returns on researched discussions about content practices—Rebekka Andersen and Tatiana Batova (2015) published an integrative review that reported only 22 mentions of content management from scholarly sources. The lack of academic resources “to establish firm best practices and suitable pedagogies for this emerging discipline” (p. 1) is what Guiseppe Getto, Jack Labriola, and Sheryl Ruszkiewicz aimed to address in their edited collection, Content Strategy in Technical Communication. As Series Editor Tharon Howard revealed, this collection is the first edited volume about content strategy that included not only the term in its title but more importantly a collection of scholarly voices by those who research and teach content strategy. This collection promised to showcase innovative practices and pedagogies, and identify best practices to meet the current and future needs of technical communication. In their introduction, the editors defined the practice of content strategy as “[planning] for the creation, publication, and governance of useful, usable information in a repeatable manner by creating consistently structured content for reuse, managing that content in a definitive source, and assembling content on demand to meet audience needs” (p. 2). This lengthy description in Chapter 1 is used as the basis for the applications, research, and assessment of content strategy work throughout the book. Also included in the editors’ introduction is a preliminary set of best practices based on the pieces curated in this volume. These best practices were sorted into three categories: (1) “strategies for developing and deploying content,” (2) “use of emerging technologies and systems for managing and publishing content,” and (3) “usability and Book Reviews
书评:技术传播中的内容策略(Giuseppe, G, Labriola, J.T和Ruszkiewicz, S)
大约20年前,当Albers和Mazur(2003)引入“内容”作为一个可用的术语来描述信息工件(或体系结构)并表达这些工件创建和消费方式的复杂性时,技术通信的学术领域开始对内容开发和内容管理的新兴领域感兴趣。然而,在顶级学术期刊中快速搜索技术和专业交流的关键字,关于内容实践的研究讨论的回报令人惊讶地微乎其微——rebekka Andersen和Tatiana Batova(2015)发表了一篇综合评论,报告只有22次提到学术来源的内容管理。Guiseppe Getto、Jack Labriola和Sheryl Ruszkiewicz在他们编辑的合集《技术传播中的内容策略》中指出,缺乏“为这一新兴学科建立可靠的最佳实践和合适的教学方法”的学术资源(第1页)。正如系列编辑Tharon Howard透露的那样,这本合集是第一本关于内容策略的编辑卷,它不仅在标题中包含了术语,更重要的是,它收集了那些研究和教授内容策略的学者的声音。该系列承诺展示创新的实践和教学方法,并确定最佳实践,以满足当前和未来的技术交流需求。在他们的介绍中,编辑将内容策略的实践定义为“以可重复的方式创建,发布和管理有用的,可用的信息的[计划],通过创建一致的结构化内容进行重用,在确定的来源中管理该内容,并根据需要组装内容以满足受众的需求”(第2页)。第1章中的这一冗长描述被用作应用程序,研究,内容策略的评估贯穿全书。在编辑的介绍中还包括一组基于本卷中策划的片段的初步最佳实践。这些最佳实践被分为三类:(1)“开发和部署内容的策略”,(2)“管理和发布内容的新兴技术和系统的使用”,以及(3)“可用性和书评”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信