Managing Supply Risk for Vertically Differentiated Co-Products

IF 0.1 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
S. Bansal, S. Transchel
{"title":"Managing Supply Risk for Vertically Differentiated Co-Products","authors":"S. Bansal, S. Transchel","doi":"10.1111/POMS.12173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The manufacturing complexity of many high-tech products results in a substantial variation in the quality of the units produced. Post manufacturing, the units are classified into vertically differentiated products. These products are typically obtained in uncontrollable fractions, leading to mismatches between their demand and supply. We focus on product stock-outs due to the supply-demand mismatches. Existing literature suggests that when faced with product stock-outs, firms should satisfy all unmet demand of a low-end product by downgrading excess units of a high-end product (downward substitution). However, this policy may be sub-optimal if it is likely that low-end customers will substitute with a higher quality product and pay the higher price (upward substitution). In this paper, we investigate whether and how much downward substitution firms should perform. We also investigate whether and how much low-end inventory firms should withhold to strategically divert some low-end demand to the high-end product. We first establish the existence of regions of co-production technology and willingness of customers to substitute upwards where firms adopt different substitution/withholding strategies. Then, we develop a managerial framework to determine the optimal selling strategy during the life cycle of technology products as profit margins shrink, manufacturing technology improves, and more capacity becomes available. Consistent trends exist for exogenous and endogenous prices.","PeriodicalId":49886,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing Engineering","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/POMS.12173","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

The manufacturing complexity of many high-tech products results in a substantial variation in the quality of the units produced. Post manufacturing, the units are classified into vertically differentiated products. These products are typically obtained in uncontrollable fractions, leading to mismatches between their demand and supply. We focus on product stock-outs due to the supply-demand mismatches. Existing literature suggests that when faced with product stock-outs, firms should satisfy all unmet demand of a low-end product by downgrading excess units of a high-end product (downward substitution). However, this policy may be sub-optimal if it is likely that low-end customers will substitute with a higher quality product and pay the higher price (upward substitution). In this paper, we investigate whether and how much downward substitution firms should perform. We also investigate whether and how much low-end inventory firms should withhold to strategically divert some low-end demand to the high-end product. We first establish the existence of regions of co-production technology and willingness of customers to substitute upwards where firms adopt different substitution/withholding strategies. Then, we develop a managerial framework to determine the optimal selling strategy during the life cycle of technology products as profit margins shrink, manufacturing technology improves, and more capacity becomes available. Consistent trends exist for exogenous and endogenous prices.
垂直差异化产品的供应风险管理
许多高科技产品制造的复杂性导致生产出来的产品质量有很大差异。制造后,将单元划分为垂直差异化产品。这些产品通常以不可控的馏分获得,导致它们的需求和供应不匹配。我们关注由于供需不匹配导致的产品缺货。现有文献表明,当面临产品缺货时,企业应该通过降低高端产品的过剩单位(向下替代)来满足所有低端产品的未满足需求。然而,如果低端客户可能会用更高质量的产品替代,并支付更高的价格(向上替代),则该策略可能是次优的。本文主要研究企业是否应该进行向下替代,以及向下替代的程度。我们还研究了低端库存企业是否应该保留以及保留多少库存以战略性地将一些低端需求转移到高端产品。首先,在企业采用不同替代/代扣策略的情况下,我们建立了合作生产技术区域和消费者向上替代意愿的存在性。然后,我们开发了一个管理框架,以确定在技术产品的生命周期内,随着利润率的缩小,制造技术的改进,更多的产能变得可用的最优销售策略。外生和内生价格的趋势是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Manufacturing Engineering
Manufacturing Engineering 工程技术-工程:制造
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信